TheSaxlad wrote:In that case:
KoRT: CCup win is nullified due to sitting abuse. (josko)
THOTA:cup win is nullified due to sitting abuse. (blitzaholic)
TOFU: Ccup win is nullified due to sitting abuse (CoF)
So by right the cup should default to the next highest clan which happens to be nemesis. If you all gonna try and take the cup on technicalities, then don't even both. KoRT won the Cup. Either move on or give it to nemesis.
These three examples are not the same type of circumstance. Your comparisons are more like should a team that won the World Series forfeit the Series win because one of their players was arrested and convicted of a crime that had nothing to do with the Series?
If the crime in question skewed the results (or had the potential to skew the results) of the Series, like throwing a game, ie. Shoeless Joe Jackson, then should the team forfeit the Series?
The abuse in question here occurred during the TOFU v KoRT and THOTA v KoRT clan wars. Therefore, since that abuse could have skewed the results of the clan wars, should the CC1 cup be forfeited?
Lets stick to comparing apples to apples.



