Forum

by **paulpoyser** on Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:02 am

As a player in an adjacent attacks tournament, i would like the rules hard-coded to stop players (such as me) from inadvertently breaking the rules.
And one thing really irritates me is the game finder - I put in my request and more often than not, the first few games shown are the same map, number of players, format etc. because one player likes a particular map and sets up several at the same time - couldn't the list be randomised, so that at least the first few maps are different (when selecting several maps at a time) and could it be possible to show a list of games that only need one player before starting?

Paul

by **Catarah** on Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:30 am

oh i would love to finaly have Adjacent Attacks implented!

by **gimli1990** on Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:09 pm

Catarah wrote:oh i would love to finaly have Adjacent Attacks implented!

I 100% agree with this post.

it would be about ime to see adjacent attacks implemented.

by **rdsrds2120** on Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:39 am

Wow! I never actually knew there was so much support for adjacent attacks! Thanks for your thoughts, I will be closing this Sunday, so if you have any more things to add, do so quickly!

-rd

by **Ace Rimmer** on Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:18 pm

The most posts and second most views (behind Infected neutrals) of anything in submitted suggestions, so I think there's a bit of support

by **OliverFA** on Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:35 pm

rdsrds2120 wrote:Wow! I never actually knew there was so much support for adjacent attacks! Thanks for your thoughts, I will be closing this Sunday, so if you have any more things to add, do so quickly!

-rd

I don't know about the rest of the supporters, but what I have to say is that my support for Adjacent Attacks goes so far that I am willing to help with any beta games or any other stuff where I could give a hand regarding this subject.

by **Ace Rimmer** on Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:58 pm

Oliver has also said in the past that he's willing to pay for the AA implementation

I'm willing to help psuedo-code as well

by **Didacus** on Thu Jun 23, 2011 5:21 pm

Adjacent attacks X 10

I have said all I have to say.

oh, and; Thank you for the great job CC-staff!

by **OliverFA** on Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:40 pm

jakewilliams wrote:Oliver has also said in the past that he's willing to pay for the AA implementation

I'm willing to help psuedo-code as well

In fact when I said "give a hand" it was literal. I would still have one hand left

by **rdsrds2120** on Fri Jun 24, 2011 5:20 pm

Thanks for all of the input! Be sure to read a writeup of it in the next edition of the CC Dispatch!

-rd

by **PLAYER57832** on Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:54 am

I can think of a lot of suggestions I would like to see happen, but it is hard to go back over the entire list. I imagine some things were more important in the past. And, a couple of new things have not made the list that I think ought to have.

Right now, I would like to see some tweaks to the rating system, the ability to sort by wins/losses in the game finder (that is, have "won" and " lost" as an option along with number of players, map, etc);

by **fumandomuerte** on Sat Jun 25, 2011 2:19 am

OliverFA wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:Wow! I never actually knew there was so much support for adjacent attacks! Thanks for your thoughts, I will be closing this Sunday, so if you have any more things to add, do so quickly!

-rd

I don't know about the rest of the supporters, but what I have to say is that my support for Adjacent Attacks goes so far that I am willing to help with any beta games or any other stuff where I could give a hand regarding this subject.

Seriously, I'm willing to pay for a premium account just to be a beta tester of this option. This additional option to plot strategies is more than awesome, it combines the best of risk, diplomacy and stratego altogether. CC really has to consider it as a priority on its to-do list.