Three Kingdoms of Korea [Quenched]

[natty dread]

Ok, I hope they're better now.

New XML is also done.

Click image to enlarge.

Click image to enlarge.

korea5.xml

new xml

(48.1 KiB) Downloaded 13 times

[pamoa]

I hate to repeat myself but it seems you don't want to answer this
I was hoping better from you

you need to reorder both of your legends to help players to find bonus area
please follow the left-right top-bottom order

goguryeo
tang
baekje
silla
gaya
wa

[natty dread]

I answered it last page.

Anyway, yeah, I forgot to do the right legend. So much shit to do. I'll do it in the next update.

[thenobodies80]

Can you get this uploaded, please.

Large - http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/9531/korea25.png
Small - http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/6880/korea25s.png
XML - download/file.php?id=191

Sent to lackattack.

[HighlanderAttack]

Game 9515412

so I come to this game and see that in a 1v1 game my opponent took one territ and now has 13 armies due--is this right--first time on the map but damn really?

[Coleman]

Ok, I hope they're better now.

Awesome thanks. I was surprised to see a territory name change so late but I hadn't been following this one that closely.

Game 9515412

so I come to this game and see that in a 1v1 game my opponent took one territ and now has 13 armies due--is this right--first time on the map but damn really?

seems to still be the old image so I had to change to large to read these

daegaya, aragaya, geumgwangaya, and sakju all become worth +2 with the ownership of gyaongju, which itself seems to be worth +2 under the same rule.
3 + (5 x 2) = 13

So the map is working as intended. Your situation isn't as bad as it first appears though, daegaya has to advance through jinhan to take it back if you break it, and teng-chou can attack there as well.

Additionally, if all those other neutrals were a 3rd player green's position would be nowhere near as powerful. 1v1 has always been flawed in my opinion (not that I'm not happy we have it).

[natty dread]

Game 9515412

so I come to this game and see that in a 1v1 game my opponent took one territ and now has 13 armies due--is this right--first time on the map but damn really?

I suggest you wait until this update goes live before starting any more games. The old version is very unbalanced.

[HighlanderAttack]

Game 9515412

so I come to this game and see that in a 1v1 game my opponent took one territ and now has 13 armies due--is this right--first time on the map but damn really?

I suggest you wait until this update goes live before starting any more games. The old version is very unbalanced.

I do not control tourney games and when they are sent out but that is good to hear

[HighlanderAttack]

Ok, I hope they're better now.

Awesome thanks. I was surprised to see a territory name change so late but I hadn't been following this one that closely.

Game 9515412

so I come to this game and see that in a 1v1 game my opponent took one territ and now has 13 armies due--is this right--first time on the map but damn really?

seems to still be the old image so I had to change to large to read these

daegaya, aragaya, geumgwangaya, and sakju all become worth +2 with the ownership of gyaongju, which itself seems to be worth +2 under the same rule.
3 + (5 x 2) = 13

So the map is working as intended. Your situation isn't as bad as it first appears though, daegaya has to advance through jinhan to take it back if you break it, and teng-chou can attack there as well.

Additionally, if all those other neutrals were a 3rd player green's position would be nowhere near as powerful. 1v1 has always been flawed in my opinion (not that I'm not happy we have it).

Thanks--hope I get good dice

[PLAYER57832]

OK, looks like you might already be addressing this. From a 1 vs 1 perspective only (and understanding that not every map needs to play well 1 vs 1 ), I think you need to reduce the bonuses across the board.

Also, you have 2 basic "buildings" that I can see. However, the bonuses vary widely. If you want to vary the bonuses, then try varying the structures somehow. That is, all castles "should" more have the same basic bonus, if you want one more, maybe make it a "palace" or some such. OR, just skip the "castle" label and give each individual names.

[natty dread]

All castles give +1. Capitals give no bonus, they only activate the bonus of their corresponding Kingdom.

[osujacket]

much better on the graphics....ty

[thenobodies80]

Game 9515412

so I come to this game and see that in a 1v1 game my opponent took one territ and now has 13 armies due--is this right--first time on the map but damn really?

I suggest you wait until this update goes live before starting any more games. The old version is very unbalanced.

The updated version is now available.

[natty dread]

Great! On to testing...

If Silla is still overly powerful, we can tweak it to give +2 for 3 like Tang. Although I have a feeling it won't be necessary - Silla's capital has 8 neutrals now, which might even run the risk of it being left ignored... but we'll see about that.

[PLAYER57832]

looks like you are already fixing the issue, but one thought.. if you want to keep certain capitals, etc as main targets, what about making this an objective map? That makes it more "up front" .. that those are the goal, instead of just a lack of balance.

Not sure its what you want or that it would work, just and idea. (reject or accept at whim)