that's what you get for joining public games.
stick to games with people you know and you will have a lot of fun as well as a friendly chat.
Moderators: Global Moderators, Discussions Team

Metsfanmax wrote:
It appears that one of your "monkeys" won that game.
danryan wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:
It appears that one of your "monkeys" won that game.
It doesn't mean that their play won them the game. When 4 out of 6 players use suboptimal strategy the best player usually will not win. Hence good players stay out of these type of games.
Elmo9199 wrote:take it if you can hold it.

DiM wrote:
that's what you get for joining public games.
stick to games with people you know and you will have a lot of fun as well as a friendly chat.

owenshooter wrote:i disagree with you and i'm right!
BYUwonder11 wrote:danryan wrote:....
It doesn't mean that their play won them the game. When 4 out of 6 players use suboptimal strategy the best player usually will not win. Hence good players stay out of these type of games.
Well by definition if they're using a suboptimal strategy, then they're not GOOD players even, much less the best right? ....
Gillipig wrote:Coming from someone who's good at 4 player esc games but bad at 6 player esc games, I can tell you that being a bonus monkey is the name of the game in most 4 player esc games.
laughingcavalier wrote:I grew up playing escalating adjacent, usually 3-4 players & we always played for bonuses. I often wonder if I would beat my younger self.
Bonuses can help on big maps like ww2 europe or biggish unusual maps like aom even in 6-8 player games.

neanderpaul14 wrote:laughingcavalier wrote:I grew up playing escalating adjacent, usually 3-4 players & we always played for bonuses. I often wonder if I would beat my younger self.
Bonuses can help on big maps like ww2 europe or biggish unusual maps like aom even in 6-8 player games.
But would you beat yourself now?![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests