Round Limits

Archival storage for Announcements. Peruse old Announcements here!

Moderators: Media Team, Community Team, Global Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Round Limits

Postby denominator on Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:14 pm

ljex wrote:
denominator wrote:
ljex wrote:Do people not realize that this changes the entire strategy of the game. Clearly everyone knows who is going to win as it starts coming down to the end and they are going to make the moves they think are best but if anything i think this addition encourages people to attack more throughout the game and not stack as much. Either way this is a good update, people can complain all they want and say it should have been done differently but i dont see how. Clearly if we are in round 19 people are going to know that the end is near and attacking will ensue so that everyone can try to put themselves in the best position. It does give a bit of an advantage to the last player to play...but seeing as that is random and being last is a disadvantage, i dont see how that is a problem.

Good update lack


While I agree mostly with your analysis, I think it's going to cause players to stack more early instead of attacking. Most notably in the short games (20 rounds), I suspect players are going to conserve troops as much as possible in the first 15 or so rounds, then it will be 5 rounds of all out suiciding to determine the winner.

It reminds me a bit of NASCAR - the first 490 laps are just driving in circles trying to stay in a position where you have the possibility of winning, and the last 10 are actually for racing.


haha problem is if you are just stacking people are going to view you as the main threat and attack you, when being attacked you have lower odds so good players will know to keep themselves not at the top but near it while still attacking around to gain strength by having a higher deploy and such.


Agreed - except in the fog games. BOB obviously helps there, but if you manage to gain a territory or two that others can't see, you could simply stack all your troops there and no-one would be the wiser.

Chariot of Fire wrote:
When playing a round limited game with teams, the winning team will be based on highest individual troop count, not teamwide troup count.


Interesting. So at the end of, say, Round 20 the quad team with one player left with 10 armies would beat the team with 9,9,9,9 (36 armies). Seems a bit unfair somehow.

What happens in the event the teams each have a player with an equal highest number of troops and territories?


It seems to me that the best thing to do in a stalemated game 3 rounds before the end would be to have 3 of the players miss turns. If 3/4 of the team deadbeat, all the troops will be passed to the remaining teammate. Individual troop count is a very poor indication of overall team position.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class denominator
Beta Team Member
Beta Team Member
 
Posts: 1536
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:41 am
Location: Calgary
Medals: 73
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (11) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (4) Challenge Achievement (2)

Re: Round Limits

Postby Victor Sullivan on Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:16 pm

I don't see why you can't work with it. A team that's 9, 9, 9, 9 versus a player with 10 and the 10 wins, well that's the first team's fault! They should have forted up a teammate as the Round Limit approached.

-Sully
User avatar
Corporal Victor Sullivan
 
Posts: 7175
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Location: Columbus, OH
Medals: 45
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1)
General Achievement (9) Map Contribution (4) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (6)

Re: Round Limits

Postby patrickaa317 on Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:18 pm

denominator wrote:
ljex wrote:
denominator wrote:
ljex wrote:Do people not realize that this changes the entire strategy of the game. Clearly everyone knows who is going to win as it starts coming down to the end and they are going to make the moves they think are best but if anything i think this addition encourages people to attack more throughout the game and not stack as much. Either way this is a good update, people can complain all they want and say it should have been done differently but i dont see how. Clearly if we are in round 19 people are going to know that the end is near and attacking will ensue so that everyone can try to put themselves in the best position. It does give a bit of an advantage to the last player to play...but seeing as that is random and being last is a disadvantage, i dont see how that is a problem.

Good update lack


While I agree mostly with your analysis, I think it's going to cause players to stack more early instead of attacking. Most notably in the short games (20 rounds), I suspect players are going to conserve troops as much as possible in the first 15 or so rounds, then it will be 5 rounds of all out suiciding to determine the winner.

It reminds me a bit of NASCAR - the first 490 laps are just driving in circles trying to stay in a position where you have the possibility of winning, and the last 10 are actually for racing.


haha problem is if you are just stacking people are going to view you as the main threat and attack you, when being attacked you have lower odds so good players will know to keep themselves not at the top but near it while still attacking around to gain strength by having a higher deploy and such.


Agreed - except in the fog games. BOB obviously helps there, but if you manage to gain a territory or two that others can't see, you could simply stack all your troops there and no-one would be the wiser.

Chariot of Fire wrote:
When playing a round limited game with teams, the winning team will be based on highest individual troop count, not teamwide troup count.


Interesting. So at the end of, say, Round 20 the quad team with one player left with 10 armies would beat the team with 9,9,9,9 (36 armies). Seems a bit unfair somehow.

What happens in the event the teams each have a player with an equal highest number of troops and territories?


It seems to me that the best thing to do in a stalemated game 3 rounds before the end would be to have 3 of the players miss turns. If 3/4 of the team deadbeat, all the troops will be passed to the remaining teammate. Individual troop count is a very poor indication of overall team position.


You'd miss those 9 deployments.

And how many Quads games are stalemated after 17 rounds?

I do agree that highest individual troop count is a piss poor way to do it for team games. Then again, I doubt I'll ever play a team game with round limits except 2v2v2 or 2v2v2v2
taking a break from cc, will be back sometime in the future.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class patrickaa317
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:10 pm
Medals: 116
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (4)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (18) General Achievement (7) Clan Achievement (21)
Tournament Contribution (27) General Contribution (1)

Re: Round Limits

Postby nvrijn on Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:27 pm

"It seems to me that the best thing to do in a stalemated game 3 rounds before the end would be to have 3 of the players miss turns. If 3/4 of the team deadbeat, all the troops will be passed to the remaining teammate."

Brilliant! The variant just got implemented, and you've ALREADY beaten the system. I don't see why it isn't the team with the most men. That's generally who's ahead. Otherwise it's like suddenly stopping a relay race and giving it to whichever team had the guy who ran the fastest individual lap. That just seems wrong.

They don't call them TEAM games for nothing.
User avatar
Major nvrijn
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:06 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1)
Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Round Limits

Postby Mr_Adams on Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:20 pm

ManBungalow wrote:Sexy time.



It's always sexy time in the bungalow.
I am voting Republican now. The Democrats left a bad taste in my mouth -Monica Lewinski
User avatar
Lieutenant Mr_Adams
 
Posts: 1932
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:33 pm
Medals: 49
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (8) Tournament Contribution (5)

Re: Round Limits

Postby BYUwonder11 on Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:10 pm

Victor Sullivan wrote:I don't see why you can't work with it. A team that's 9, 9, 9, 9 versus a player with 10 and the 10 wins, well that's the first team's fault! They should have forted up a teammate as the Round Limit approached.

-Sully


Agreed here, how funny would that be if the one person did win...lol I think we all get the principle here of this one, doubt that this situation would happen very often if at all, but troop count just like in singles should be the determining factor
User avatar
Major BYUwonder11
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:22 pm
Location: Berk. It's twelve days north of Hopeless and a few degrees south of Freezing to Death.
Medals: 39
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1)
General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (5)

Re: Round Limits

Postby ender516 on Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:46 pm

Victor Sullivan wrote:I don't see why you can't work with it. A team that's 9, 9, 9, 9 versus a player with 10 and the 10 wins, well that's the first team's fault! They should have forted up a teammate as the Round Limit approached.

-Sully

People can work with it, but the question is: how much should the introduction of the round limit affect the play? I always felt that the calculation of the winner should favour the player or team that would likely win in the long run if there were no limit. I agree with Chariot of Fire that the intact team should prevail over the lone player. With this "single best player represents the team" method, we will now need to adjust strategy to keep the limit in mind, and pile everything onto one player. Doing this makes the other players more vulnerable to elimination, which might lead to the singleton taking the game before the limit expires. So there you have an obviously stronger team being forced to weaken its position in order to win. :-s :?: :?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ender516
 
Posts: 4452
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Medals: 37
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (9)
Map Contribution (5) General Contribution (11)

Re: Round Limits

Postby elGrande on Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:57 pm

nvrijn wrote:At first blush, I loved the idea. Imposing a turn limit is a great way to avoid those endless "reinforce and hold" games with no RISK (or even Fixed value Risk). CC is very responsive to players needs.

But there were several ways to do it. Determine the winner by number of territories held, by the bonus received or by number of men. Someone chose number of men, but I really think one of the alternatives (or a combination) might have been better.

Now as the clock approaches midnight in a multi-player game, everyone is trying to avoid attacking anyone else. It's pretty clear who's NOT gonna win, and any player who recognizes that fact can determine the winner by attacking the leading rival. So the temptation to suicide is going to be very strong, and the ultimate reward goes to the player who didn't piss anyone off. That tends to minimize strategy over diplomacy, and players who know each other will be far more likely to cooperate "in the end game" then they are now.

But if the primary factor was territories or bonuses, it's different (and I think better). The player who is strategic enough to barricade themselves off from multiple attackers, while racing around and ensuring no one else has a higher territory count, or bonus count, probably deserves to win. The downside is that it offers a real disadvantage to the guy that goes first.

I suspect the optimum way would be to choose the winner based upon several factors.

Total number of bonuses
Total number of territories (factors different if different number of territories in the variant)
The remaining number of men


It might be more complex to figure out, but that is GOOD because it gives a player several ways to win, the point weighing reflects the actual strategy considerations, the special suicide end game strategy is minimized, and it would provide several strategies for winning as the turn clock ticked down, instead of only one.

Is the current "end value" computation of this new variant written in stone?

Regards,

NVRijn


This guy sees the very same issues I stated earlier and points them out very clearly! Well done sir.

Only using the most troops as the math to decide the winner is very problematic and just makes zero sense.
User avatar
Cook elGrande
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:36 pm
Medals: 16
Standard Achievement (4) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Round Limits

Postby elGrande on Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:03 am

Guys.. the real issue is not the round limit... its the math that decides the winner. If more math/thought is put into how a winner is decided in the case of the limits being met.. we would find much less opportunity for abuse. I suggest we fix the big problem first.. then look at it all again and find where there could be abuse. I will bet.. once we decide on a more fair algorithm for deciding the winner we will have less to discuss.
User avatar
Cook elGrande
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:36 pm
Medals: 16
Standard Achievement (4) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Round Limits

Postby eddie2 on Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:23 am

now really cc has wasted there time coding a real stupid item on site when there are really valid things needing addressed. i mean come on this update is just going to encorage more farming etc. building games are 9 out of ten times on maps like feudal that avearge game runs more than 20 rounds. so the player who sits and does nothing wins you are taking the game away players will just sit and stack bombard and hope they win.

also what about assassin games. 1 player goes for his target his target has 1 troup left he has 19 and the other has 22 are you reaslly telling me you are gonna class the guy with 22 troups the leader.

same as in terminator games say 4 player game

player a 1 region 1 troup left because player b attacked him.

player b 15 troups stacked beside player a cornered 30 regions.

player c 30 troups 5 regions

player d 28 troups.

are you really saying player b although he has a kill his next turn wont get any points. because player c or d wont attack if it is close to end of round limit.

come on cc i thought you would look at what complications would come into effect with a option like this. all this is gonna do is piss a lot of players off.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant eddie2
 
Posts: 3831
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: jersey channel islands
Medals: 73
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (10)
Tournament Contribution (5) General Contribution (3)

Re: Round Limits

Postby swimmerdude99 on Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:55 am

Can we just get a formal announcement of how it works in each game? Although personally, if you have an issue with assassin, team or terminator (which I would) just don't play them with limits!
Image

High Score: 2992
User avatar
Captain swimmerdude99
 
Posts: 1096
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
Location: North Carolina
Medals: 87
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (2) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (14)
General Achievement (9) Clan Achievement (8) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Round Limits

Postby eddie2 on Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:30 am

swimmerdude99 wrote:Can we just get a formal announcement of how it works in each game? Although personally, if you have an issue with assassin, team or terminator (which I would) just don't play them with limits!


my point exactly what have we got just now.

1) clan war database (waiting for coding)
2) adjacent attacks (waiting for coding)
3) babysitting feature (waiting for coding.

plus more i cant remember. and what do we get a program coded that all it will cause is loads of arguements. cc really does need to start getting decent updates of things that are needed not things that are not.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant eddie2
 
Posts: 3831
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: jersey channel islands
Medals: 73
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (10)
Tournament Contribution (5) General Contribution (3)

Re: Round Limits

Postby Leehar on Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:07 pm

Round limits is necessary for the next update in the works, before we get onto the new developer and the clan interests
Image
show
User avatar
General Leehar
Head Clan Director
Head Clan Director
 
Posts: 6063
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Location: Graduation Ceremony
Medals: 129
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (31)
General Achievement (21) Clan Achievement (13) Training Achievement (9) Challenge Achievement (2) General Contribution (9)

Re: Round Limits

Postby swimmerdude99 on Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:19 pm

I agree with all points but the sitting feature. Do you realize how lame that would be? I'm not playing but the cpu will take my turn for me by a programmed attack? We don't need that. Anywho, I like this update, just give me some specifics and a real epxlanation of how it works please
Image

High Score: 2992
User avatar
Captain swimmerdude99
 
Posts: 1096
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
Location: North Carolina
Medals: 87
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (2) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (14)
General Achievement (9) Clan Achievement (8) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Round Limits

Postby ender516 on Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:10 pm

The sitting feature is intended to give better control of account sitting, where one player covers turns for another. Right now, this is done by giving away passwords, a risky business. The built-in feature would control the authorization by one player of another to take turns, without permitting access to profiles, inboxes, and so on.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ender516
 
Posts: 4452
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Medals: 37
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (9)
Map Contribution (5) General Contribution (11)

Re: Round Limits

Postby Chariot of Fire on Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:34 pm

Just playing Devil's Advocate here ender, but if the new sitting feature doesn't allow access to the Inbox (which I actually believe is a good thing - I hate having my mail read) it could result in that player being kicked out of tourney games if the invite has gone via PM. I think we've all been in the scenario whereby an absent player has asked for PMs to be checked and tourney games to be joined.

Is it possible therefore to change the structure of the mail system, whereby new PMs arrive in an Inbox and any read messages (i.e. the old ones that the user wishes to keep) get moved to a 'Read Items' folder? A sitter would only have access to the Inbox, thus ensuring confidentiality of saved messages whilst still allowing new PMs to be read and tourney games, if invited, joined.
Image
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
User avatar
General Chariot of Fire
 
Posts: 3116
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Hong Kong
Medals: 89
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (21) General Achievement (9) Clan Achievement (25)

Re: Round Limits

Postby ender516 on Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:50 pm

I guess I have to be more careful about my pronouncements. I don't know for certain what the sitter feature would entail exactly, and I believe that there is a topic in the Suggestions forum to discuss it in detail. I was mostly trying to point out that the sitter feaure would not involve an AI taking your turns for you.

Anyway, when you create a game, can't you invite players and have that show up on their My Games page, without using a PM?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ender516
 
Posts: 4452
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Medals: 37
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (9)
Map Contribution (5) General Contribution (11)

Re: Round Limits

Postby swimmerdude99 on Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:10 pm

ender516 wrote:The sitting feature is intended to give better control of account sitting, where one player covers turns for another. Right now, this is done by giving away passwords, a risky business. The built-in feature would control the authorization by one player of another to take turns, without permitting access to profiles, inboxes, and so on.


Ohhhh. Cool, I'm sorry for my statement and being out of the loop on that one, I agree that would be nice. This would mean that it would automatically post who took the turn as well correct?
Image

High Score: 2992
User avatar
Captain swimmerdude99
 
Posts: 1096
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
Location: North Carolina
Medals: 87
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (2) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (14)
General Achievement (9) Clan Achievement (8) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Round Limits

Postby denominator on Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:59 am

ender516 wrote:I guess I have to be more careful about my pronouncements. I don't know for certain what the sitter feature would entail exactly, and I believe that there is a topic in the Suggestions forum to discuss it in detail. I was mostly trying to point out that the sitter feaure would not involve an AI taking your turns for you.

Anyway, when you create a game, can't you invite players and have that show up on their My Games page, without using a PM?


Very true. Although from what some tournament organizers have told me, it is sometimes simpler to send out a PM with a bunch of game links for players to join than inviting each individual player to each game. Think Map Blaster - where each player plays over 170 games, that would require over 1000 invites for one group alone. Or HA's 200th tourney - where players are PMed instructions on how to join the next round, but no invites could be sent.

Perhaps something else in the coding that the PM sender can tick off for "sitter can read".
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class denominator
Beta Team Member
Beta Team Member
 
Posts: 1536
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:41 am
Location: Calgary
Medals: 73
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (11) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (4) Challenge Achievement (2)

Re: Round Limits

Postby ender516 on Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:39 pm

Coordinating the PMs (part of the forum database) with the sitter feature (part of the game database) strikes me as tricky, but I don't honestly know. It might be better to have the sitter PM the TO for special dispensation in these cases. I would hope that the absent player would let a sitter know that there was a tournament with games that the sitter would need to join.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ender516
 
Posts: 4452
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Medals: 37
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (9)
Map Contribution (5) General Contribution (11)

Re: Round Limits

Postby eddie2 on Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:32 am

why are we talking about pms for tourneys. if someone is being sat for they are meant to tell the organiser anyway.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant eddie2
 
Posts: 3831
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: jersey channel islands
Medals: 73
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (10)
Tournament Contribution (5) General Contribution (3)

Re: Round Limits

Postby firstholliday on Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:27 am

:roll:
Image
7 firstholliday 3589 (58%) General 128-2 Netherlands
User avatar
Brigadier firstholliday
 
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)
Medals: 37
Monthly Leader Silver (1) Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (2)
Terminator Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (7)

Re: Round Limits

Postby QoH on Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:10 pm

eddie2 wrote:why are we talking about pms for tourneys. if someone is being sat for they are meant to tell the organiser anyway.

Do you EVER read the thread?
Image
Please don't invite me to any pickup games. I will decline the invite.
Major QoH
 
Posts: 1835
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:37 pm
Medals: 78
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (9) General Achievement (7) Clan Achievement (10)
Training Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (7)

Re: Round Limits

Postby ender516 on Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:21 pm

We do seem to have drifted away from the discussion of Round Limits.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ender516
 
Posts: 4452
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Medals: 37
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (9)
Map Contribution (5) General Contribution (11)

Re: Round Limits

Postby Teflon Kris on Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:31 pm

Round Limits

Great idea - professionally introduced.

Hats off to the Great Turtle and our Ancient Ancestor for getting feedback quickly from several places.

Nice job CC!

=D> =D> =D>

(P.S. 1'd still love a 15 round option for speed ;) )
User avatar
Captain Teflon Kris
 
Posts: 3737
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom
Medals: 174
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (4) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (4)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (2) Bot Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (30)
General Achievement (14) Clan Achievement (20) Challenge Achievement (2) Tournament Contribution (32) General Contribution (8)

PreviousNext

Return to Announcement Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Login