Re: RAIL ASIA [1.11.12] QUENCHED

[cairnswk]

Looks good, though I'd reduce Beijing's bonus to +5.
-Sully

Chopping and changing Sully.
Beiing is now a 4 region terminal, so have adjusted that to +3, same as Tbilisi.

[cairnswk]

Version 12

Click image to enlarge.

[Victor Sullivan]

D to +5, F to +6... As far as BJN is concerned, I'm a little confused as to why there are two D stations.

-Sully

[cairnswk]

D to +5, F to +6... As far as BJN is concerned, I'm a little confused as to why there are two D stations.

-Sully

Sully, i thought that creating a triangle for that wouldn't look right.
So i created the same as Tbilisi.
so two of the sides had to be D platforms.

[Victor Sullivan]

D to +5, F to +6... As far as BJN is concerned, I'm a little confused as to why there are two D stations.

-Sully

Sully, i thought that creating a triangle for that wouldn't look right.
So i created the same as Tbilisi.
so two of the sides had to be D platforms.

Fair enough, I suppose.

-Sully

[cairnswk]

D to +5, F to +6... As far as BJN is concerned, I'm a little confused as to why there are two D stations.

-Sully

Sully, i thought that creating a triangle for that wouldn't look right.
So i created the same as Tbilisi.
so two of the sides had to be D platforms.

Fair enough, I suppose.

-Sully

I just tried it again with triangles, and the outer triangle has to be quite large (because of the acute angles) in order to fit the lilne designator in that outside space.
Do you have an alternative, and is there any real problem with having it that way.

[cairnswk]

...
Fair enough, I suppose.
-Sully

Sully, i found a configuration that kinda works for me, i'm not totally happy with it, but it cuts the lines down to three in Bejing.
Does this work for you also?

[ender516]

I thought it quite reasonable for a city the size of Beijing to have two stations on one line, but the naming convention would need some tweaking. The new configuration has some appeal, as it resembles a brilliant cut diamond seen in profile. With one less station in D, is it still worth 5?

[cairnswk]

I thought it quite reasonable for a city the size of Beijing to have two stations on one line, but the naming convention would need some tweaking. The new configuration has some appeal, as it resembles a brilliant cut diamond seen in profile. With one less station in D, is it still worth 5?

Thanks ender516.
my calculator says it's only worth +4.

[cairnswk]

If everyone is happy with this graphic for BJN, then i'll run with that, i think apart from that bonus for N Chinese ?, everything is set for gameplay.

[TaCktiX]

Now that I'm looking at it, the font for the bonus names does the letter "N" no favors that small. Any chance of a slightly different one?

[cairnswk]

Now that I'm looking at it, the font for the bonus names does the letter "N" no favors that small. Any chance of a slightly different one?

No worries TaCktiX, i'll attend to that. Thanks.

[cairnswk]

If everyone is happy with this graphic for BJN, then i'll run with that, i think apart from that bonus for N Chinese ?, everything is set for gameplay.

Bugger, now that i've reduced BJN to 1 nothern terminus, there are only 79 stations....solution...to come shortly

[cairnswk]

If everyone is happy with this graphic for BJN, then i'll run with that, i think apart from that bonus for N Chinese ?, everything is set for gameplay.

Bugger, now that i've reduced BJN to 1 nothern terminus, there are only 79 stations....solution...to come shortly

Inserted between NVK and IRK is Taishet TAI - it won't affect the bonus for Siberian.

Version 14

[cairnswk]

Now that I'm looking at it, the font for the bonus names does the letter "N" no favors that small. Any chance of a slightly different one?

No worries TaCktiX, i'll attend to that. Thanks.

Should appear in V14.