Forum

by **jefjef** on Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:50 am

There really should be a Conquerors award. Something really cool. Though I would stipulate that in order for it to be awarded the recipient has to have never been found guilty of farming and would need to have a rating of 4.4 or higher.

by **chapcrap** on Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:55 am

jefjef wrote:There really should be a Conquerors award. Something really cool. Though I would stipulate that in order for it to be awarded the recipient has to have never been found guilty of farming and would need to have a rating of 4.4 or higher.

Agree that it's awesome. And that people who have been farming shouldn't get it.

However, the rating is subjective. Although 4.4 is pretty low relatively speaking, I think that's a bad idea. And what if someone is above and drops below or vise versa?

by **blakebowling** on Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:21 am

chapcrap wrote:
jefjef wrote:There really should be a Conquerors award. Something really cool. Though I would stipulate that in order for it to be awarded the recipient has to have never been found guilty of farming and would need to have a rating of 4.4 or higher.

Agree that it's awesome. And that people who have been farming shouldn't get it.

However, the rating is subjective. Although 4.4 is pretty low relatively speaking, I think that's a bad idea. And what if someone is above and drops below or vise versa?

Well, by CC policy medals aren't revoked after they are awarded (unless they were mistakenly or improperly awarded).

by **sdh** on Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:14 am

jefjef wrote:There really should be a Conquerors award. Something really cool. Though I would stipulate that in order for it to be awarded the recipient has to have never been found guilty of farming and would need to have a rating of 4.4 or higher.

ratings mean nothing. you really think demonfork should not be entitled to a conqueror medal because he has a rating lower than 4.4? :-s