Moderator: Clan Directors
Masli wrote:Clan Medals
War Thread Behaviour
In order to curb some poor behaviour in the war threads, players will be denied medals if their behaviour is deemed to be disruptive or inappropriate, even if it does not meet the site wide policy for a forum infraction. In the past, we’ve locked war threads due to the behaviour of a single individual, thus inherently punishing both clans. In order to be consistent, this will only be applied by the Clan Dept Head (most often these issues are raised by the CD team).
Leehar wrote:[Official] Clan MedalsMasli wrote:Clan Medals
War Thread Behaviour
In order to curb some poor behaviour in the war threads, players will be denied medals if their behaviour is deemed to be disruptive or inappropriate, even if it does not meet the site wide policy for a forum infraction. In the past, we’ve locked war threads due to the behaviour of a single individual, thus inherently punishing both clans. In order to be consistent, this will only be applied by the Clan Dept Head (most often these issues are raised by the CD team).
At least the decision was consistent with the outlined policies?
I could understand if it was more arbitrary, but there has been a line drawn in the sand and if this is whats necessary to curb inappropriate behaviour, then it has to start somewhere?
Great-Ollie wrote:If you ever want a change pf scenery we are looking for a great player to join or ranks in a leadership role. We could use you for your playing skills and you leadership skills. You would fit right in as myself and John Deere are both 32. Think about it but i understand if you have loyalties to Legion.
chemefreak wrote:I hate the Pack...
Random is a bitch. This one is truly old vs new. I'm going with new...but I expect Myth to put up a hell of a fight.
Good luck to both clans....although, when privs are requested I will need someone from Myth to actually acknowledge that this thread exists!
Great-Ollie wrote:I disagree chemefreak, and that pm was a long time ago.
chemefreak wrote:Great-Ollie wrote:I disagree chemefreak, and that pm was a long time ago.
Sorry, forgot the time stamp. October 3, 2011.
hmsps wrote:So Chemefreak has stated publically that he hates your clan and he is a clan director with responsibilities I just see this as totally wrong, he should in his position be impartial. Doesnt fill me with much confidence
chemefreak wrote:Your baiting has gotten under my skin So a war is inevitable.
chemefreak wrote:No, Pack no play, Pack no sign up. There are clans in the Top 25 playing, Pack scared
chemefreak wrote:Nice. I predict that the Pack has 0% chance of winning any matches...I would probably predict that even if they were in one too
The Voice wrote:Exactly who is "the old guard"? Is a new player joining an older clan part of it? Is an old player creating a new clan a part of it? I think it's best to clarify that all clans have been screwed over at one point (or at many points) since their inceptions. Often, it's to try and get the point across that something will not be considered acceptable. This idea that there's an older-clan bias just doesn't hold water. Of course, we all have biases. And this whole notion of democracy on this site isn't reasonable or feasible. I hate the idea of mods as much as the next person. But they're a necessary evil. 99% of us just want to play the game, not bring attention onto ourselves by stirring up trouble.
I like you guys. I do. But Ollie, you're not going to make many friends making sweeping generalizations about mods. Now, Betiko's post asking for clarification is very reasonable. It's important to know that nothing about the decision says any one of you is a bad person. Tec, for example, is a great and friendly player. This decision doesn't change that.
codeblue1018 wrote:Sound decision MODS; Well done!
so we follow all the rules
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
codeblue1018 wrote:Sound decision MODS; Well done!
jefjef wrote:so we follow all the rules
The problem was you weren't and had an established history of violating CC's rules. (Yes - CC's rules - They are not chemefreaks rules).
Good decision by the clan directors.
Hopefully that type of behavior will not be seen anymore.
betiko wrote:ok, I just read from page 37, where chemefreak adressed a warning.
Yes, JD replies "sunshine and lollipops" to king achilles. Other than that?
general risk for posting japaneese surrending when we won? Ollie for defending himself? tec for.....? griff for.......?
I just don t get it. why adress a warning, it was already decided then.
Why did smegal get a medal after posting a titcake? lol
chemefreak wrote:I just want to let everyone know that the CDs are watching this thread closely. I also want to remind you all of the following:
Subject: Clan Medals [Revamp 2011]War Thread Behaviour
In order to curb some poor behaviour in the war threads, players will be denied medals if their behaviour is deemed to be disruptive or inappropriate, even if it does not meet the site wide policy for a forum infraction. In the past, we’ve locked war threads due to the behaviour of a single individual, thus inherently punishing both clans. In order to be consistent, this will only be applied by the Clan Dept Head (most often these issues are raised by the CD team).
In other words, let's keep this civil. Thanks.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users