Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators

natty_dread wrote:Gameplay needs work, though. Only 3 bonus areas? 29 territories? You're going to need more of both. More territories, and split them into more bonus areas.
Flapcake wrote:I also think that you should enlarge it up a bit and do some more bonus areas, and more territories, Finland and the Baltic countries I think you can cut off to enlarge your very cool map
natty_dread wrote:Gameplay needs work, though. Only 3 bonus areas? 29 territories? You're going to need more of both. More territories, and split them into more bonus areas.

isaiah40 wrote:This gameplay is simplistic - like Luxembourg

koontz1973 wrote:We need a few map maps that are small like Luxembourg and Doodle. They do make for an interesting game.
isaiah40 wrote:Why more than the 29 territories? This map meets the minimum requirements for the number of territories.
Roberth wrote:Yea, I wondered if it might be to few. But what do you say about this change:
* Split the Lappland region into two. (North Lappland & South Lappland)
* Split the bonus zone Norrland into two. (North Norrland & South Norrland)
* Add 8 cities to the map, 2 in every bonus zone, and give a small bonus to a player that holds both cities in a zone.
That creates 9 more regions, that makes a total of 38.
Also 5 more zones (South Norrland + 4 x city bonuses), that makes 8 total.
How does this change sound?

natty_dread wrote:koontz1973 wrote:We need a few map maps that are small like Luxembourg and Doodle. They do make for an interesting game.
How? What's interesting about luxemburg or doodle?

koontz1973 wrote:natty_dread wrote:koontz1973 wrote:We need a few map maps that are small like Luxembourg and Doodle. They do make for an interesting game.
How? What's interesting about luxemburg or doodle?
Lots.
They also make a nice change from all of the larger maps I play and see no problem with the smaller maps.
Oneyed wrote:I like as you did it - by reality. I think go with this, do not divide Lappland, also not needed to divide Norrland - both are off from reality.

natty_dread wrote:The number of regions sounds good. But you'd still only have 4 bonus regions, and the city bonuses would just be overlapping with those. The sizes of the bonus regions would be way too large, with 38 regions they'd be about 9,5 territories average... this means that no one would be able to secure and hold a bonus, other than the city bonuses, but even those would have difficult time expanding, making for a stale gameplay...
I'd still say you should split the map to at least 5 areas.
DiM wrote:i'm surprised to see the non playing terits having such cool flowy borders and the playing terits having awful pixelated ones. this definitely needs fixing.
Oneyed wrote:nice. Roberth I assume you are from Sweden, so you know your country the best. I like as you did it - by reality. I think go with this, do not divide Lappland, also not needed to divide Norrland - both are off from reality. (or go for this, but then you can make any scifi sweden map).
you also would use any impassables (rivers, woods).
Roberth wrote:That's because I wanted to make a difference between the playable borders and the non-playable. Should the playable be more flowy?

Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest