TheSaxlad wrote:Dazza does have the attack advantage but hes also a pompous prick so we can use that against him
dazza2008 wrote:Looks to me like he is not the most experienced and he got bored and tried something. He failed as he obviously would but I can't see that he meant it or cheated.
TheGeneral2112 wrote:dazza2008 wrote:Looks to me like he is not the most experienced and he got bored and tried something. He failed as he obviously would but I can't see that he meant it or cheated.
I'm not accusing him of cheating. I am accusing him of suiciding and thus throwing the game.
deathcomesrippin wrote:From what I can read in the log, and from what you had taken between round 27 and round 32, you both spent several rounds taking provinces from each other. On the final two rounds, you went twice before he even took a turn, and took 9 of his provinces. He seemed to have responded by attacking you with everything he had.
Bigbirr does have 500+ games under his belt, so I am going to note this in case it happens again, as it is not like he is brand new to the game. I feel that this is just sour grapes on your part though, General, and would caution you against posting possible spurious reports if the future. That have been quite a few cases recently where the OP was given an infraction instead of the accused. Make sure it is what you say it is before dropping a report.
TheForgivenOne wrote:1 game is not enough evidence to give out a warning.
Woodruff wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:1 game is not enough evidence to give out a warning.
1 game of THIS nature shouldn't be enough to give out a "noted" for a situation of THIS nature. It's a joke that it was.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest