Moderators: Global Moderators, Discussions Team
zimmah wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Ok, anyone who hasn't posted since Thursday or so has been prodded.
List:
eldario
Fircoal
Haggis
Clever
Tails
kratos
Iron Butterfly hasn't posted since Saturday but did mention he would have internet problems.
hey everyone im sorry for being inactive
it was posted today that i wouldnt be on today but i found the strength to get to my computer(cant wait till i order my laptop sometime this week)
ill read up and post my thoughts
hey guys sorry i got really sick again last night and am still sick so bear with me. i strongly stick to my original belief on zimmah. and someone has already pointed out he is "bull-headed" in the way that he doesnt seem to want to change his mind when he has already said he knew it was a joke. i believe its better than the other cases, i would be up for a lynch on zimmah if we dont get anymore info on someone else.
wouldn't a lynch on me be about as justified as a lynch on freezie?
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.

pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:
This is what I mean, the vote is just symbolic of the fact you have not retracted your opinion. Bull-headed indeed.
so just because you say i should retract my vote i should? no way, i retract my vote whenever i feel the need, and that is not now.
f*ck the vote, it doesn't matter. The point is you still insist he wasn't joking.

owenshooter wrote:i disagree with you and i'm right!
zimmah wrote:pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:
This is what I mean, the vote is just symbolic of the fact you have not retracted your opinion. Bull-headed indeed.
so just because you say i should retract my vote i should? no way, i retract my vote whenever i feel the need, and that is not now.
f*ck the vote, it doesn't matter. The point is you still insist he wasn't joking.
you're wrong, you insist that i insist and therefore you're skimming.
unvote vote pmchugh.

pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:
i never said i believed the joke
This is what I mean, the vote is just symbolic of the fact you have not retracted your opinion. Bull-headed indeed.
so just because you say i should retract my vote i should? no way, i retract my vote whenever i feel the need, and that is not now.
f*ck the vote, it doesn't matter. The point is you still insist he wasn't joking.
also, thisIron Butterfly wrote:jeez...let me know when you guys are done...I cant beleive were still on the stupid joke thing.

owenshooter wrote:i disagree with you and i'm right!
freezie wrote:
Dude, you did insist on beleive that I wasn'T joking. He is right, you're wrong

owenshooter wrote:i disagree with you and i'm right!
zimmah wrote:pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:
i never said i believed the joke
This is what I mean, the vote is just symbolic of the fact you have not retracted your opinion. Bull-headed indeed.
so just because you say i should retract my vote i should? no way, i retract my vote whenever i feel the need, and that is not now.
f*ck the vote, it doesn't matter. The point is you still insist he wasn't joking.
messed-up the quotes in the post above. anyway, i vote pmchugh fo skimming, because he's the one bringing back a topic that i have considered 'done' allready a few posts ago and he's blaming it on me.also, thisIron Butterfly wrote:jeez...let me know when you guys are done...I cant beleive were still on the stupid joke thing.
and i want to point out once again that just because you know something was supposed to be a joke doesn't mean it's not a lie. a lie can be covered as a joke.


owenshooter wrote:i disagree with you and i'm right!
zimmah wrote:just why are you and pcm still discussing this ancient topic, just to try and keep the discussion on me? that's quite fishy.

freezie wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:Excuse my impatience, but I'm not so sure talking about it more will get us much of anywhere unless someone claims. If we lynch anyone Day 1, it's essentially for the sake of lynching anyway, as Day 1 cases are always weak - zimmah's tactics could be scummy, they could be a mistake or the result of a hard-headed townie or something - no one really knows. I think everyone's been arguing just for the sake of arguing.
And freezie, come on, I am 99% sure we are not dealing with a lyncher. Everyone suspects lynchers in games, but lynchers are rare (and generally not that stupid).
-Sully
So, if we're going to lynch for the sake of lynching, I'll Vote: Victor Sullivan foir the sake of lynching, y'know.

zimmah wrote:pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:
i never said i believed the joke
This is what I mean, the vote is just symbolic of the fact you have not retracted your opinion. Bull-headed indeed.
so just because you say i should retract my vote i should? no way, i retract my vote whenever i feel the need, and that is not now.
f*ck the vote, it doesn't matter. The point is you still insist he wasn't joking.
messed-up the quotes in the post above. anyway, i vote pmchugh fo skimming, because he's the one bringing back a topic that i have considered 'done' allready a few posts ago and he's blaming it on me.also, thisIron Butterfly wrote:jeez...let me know when you guys are done...I cant beleive were still on the stupid joke thing.
and i want to point out once again that just because you know something was supposed to be a joke doesn't mean it's not a lie. a lie can be covered as a joke.
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:zimmah wrote:shieldgenerator7 wrote:was zimmah here for DoomYoshi's first pokemon mafia? I don't remember. If he wasn't then he might not have gotten the joke and would have thought freezie was serious.
i do get the joke, i wasn't in the first one but i did read it. fact remains that joke or not, freezie did contradict himself.zimmah wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:jonty125 wrote:Zimmah, do you have any reason not to believe freezie was joking?
thats the point though. he has said he believes he was joking , yet he still goes for this case.
i never said i believed the joke
i would assume if you get a joke you believe it?
vote zimmah was pretty suspicious of him anyway but that sends me over the edge
zimmah wrote:shieldgenerator7 wrote:was zimmah here for DoomYoshi's first pokemon mafia? I don't remember. If he wasn't then he might not have gotten the joke and would have thought freezie was serious.
i do get the joke, i wasn't in the first one but i did read it. fact remains that joke or not, freezie did contradict himself.

owenshooter wrote:i disagree with you and i'm right!
zimmah wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:jonty125 wrote:Zimmah, do you have any reason not to believe freezie was joking?
thats the point though. he has said he believes he was joking , yet he still goes for this case.
i never said i believed the joke
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests