Ok, re-read this thing. Thoughts:
Through 10 pages of discussion about you I still don't have any tells on you, town or scum. Most impressive.
I don't know why you're clinging to this nonsense like your life depends on it.
Your only meaningfull posts are ones trying to rush a lynch. Also this occured shortly after shield was starting to get some attention.
I question wether you really thought saying "Hey guys, this isn't going anywhere, let's just lynch zimmah" would work, or if you were trying to get the focus off of shield.
jonty125 wrote:unvote looks like joking is over. I aren't going to vote zimmah, for not getting a joke; but if we get seriously desperate, I would move my vote for a lynch or a claim
Same move as Shield, only much earlier.
This is a plain contradiction, [paraphrase]I know it was a joke, but I'm not buying it is a joke.[/paraphrase] unvote vote zimmah
Calls out zimmah.
zimmah wrote:note how i said that knew it was SUPPOSED TO BE (=LOOK LIKE) A joke, but I DO NOT BELIEVE it was ACTUALLY a joke. i never said that i didn't read it well enough and i never appaired to skim. if you truly believe i skimmed, you're the one skimming, as if you'd take the time to actually read what i said, it'd be obvious that i did my research. just because we don't agree doesn't mean i didn't read everything.
Zimmah explains himself.
jonty125 wrote:I didn't skim, that's how I interpreted the post. That is why I put the paraphrase tags.
Jonty acknowledges the explanation.
Several pages later:
jonty125 wrote:Zimmah, do you have any reason not to believe freezie was joking?
This just smells like an insincere question designed to prolongue the silly zimmah discussion and probably contribute to a no lynch.
Can you explain this jonty? DId you forget the explanation?
Are you ignoring it and blindly trying to get the lynch?
It's kinda weak, but it's the best I see. vote jonty