Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Information on tactics, scenarios, and all that you'll need to be successful in-game!

Moderator: Global Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby Kaskavel on Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:32 am

jltile1 wrote:
Kaskavel wrote:
jltile1 wrote:
Kaskavel wrote:1. Eliminate a player
2. Take an objective
3. Break an objective
4. Take a spoil
5. (nuclear) Remove your armies from a region you will probably be forced to nuke yourself next turn.
6. (team) Contact partner in order to make an advantageous reinforcement
7. (team) Contact partner in order to allow him to do an advantageous reinforcement
8. Capture a bonus
9. Break a bonus
10. Drop opponent to 3n-1 regions (11,14,17...)
11. (flat rate) Capture a region whose spoil is on hand
12. (fog) Block opponent's information to a critical action of yours.
13. (fog) Capture an irrelevant neutral giving the impression that you just conquered a bonus in the other side of the map
14. (trench) Increase your boarder line in order to prevent opponent from breaking through a critical area.
15. (automatic, chained) Block a line of communication through which opponent continusly reinforces misplaced 3s into action.
16. (automatic, chained) Open a line of communication through which you can reinforce misplaced 3s into action.
17. Engulf a thorn. Attacked region is the only one left "inside" your territory and opponent will wreck havoc if allowed to place his army there next turn.
18. Unblock third party. Open the rout to another player in order to attack with his big stack another player who is threatening to win the game.
19. (fog) Gain critical information about regions behind.
20. (escalating, fog) Any kind of bluffing-trying to seduce an opponent into an elimination attempt, based on wrong guessing of target's area positions.
21. (round limit) Last round's desperate attacks to surpass your opponent's army or creating a situation where a specific senario of conflict between two other players will lead to a win.
22. (team, round limit) Creating as much damage as possible against opponents when you are the weak player of the team and your army size does not count for the result of the game.
23. (escalating or any other case of cleaning up an area or an opponent) Make suboptimal attacks (mainly 3 vs 1 and 2 vs 1 but even 2 vs 2 sometimes) with not so much useful attackers when you need to "narrow" or "facilate" the advance of your main army in an otherwise dubious or uncertain elimination attempt.
24. Conquer a critical region where you want to reinforce in, be it an escalating block, a passing point to a game objective or anything else that matters in the game.
25. (specific maps killing armies) Use against opponents the spare army (armies) that are going to be wasted at the start of your next turn anyway.
26. (freestyle) Freestyle tricks. We can all imagine many situations where you completely bust opponents plans by interfearing with an otherwise stupid attack.
27. Irrelevant isolated battle (only for 3 vs 1 and 2 vs 1). The two regions are isolated from the game because of neutrals (for example the two south Australia regions in classic, when the upper two are neutrals). Making this 3 or 2 vs 1 assault can not hurt you in case you lose, but will provide a +1 region for you and a -1 region for opponent in case you win, FOR THE WHOLE GAME to follow.
28. (Specific maps) Bombardment. You have serious chances to hit too many regions, just with the same 3 troops.
29. (specific maps) One way assaults. Forever removing opponent's ability to use a one way assault route, thus trapping him in an unfavourable area.
30. (escalating) Encourage a favourable (!) elimination attempt by capturing an isolated region. Isn't it so nice when in a multiplayer escalating game you offer one opponent the chance to win the game (60% or 40%, really doesnt matter) but you in turn win the game yourself if he fails to do so?
You can bet I can find much more with some extra thinking. That was a funny list of me to do, but please do not miss my main point. It is wonderful when a cook thinks that "I will make this normaly unfavourable 2 vs 1 attack, because opponent's reinforcements from the south will be cut off in case I succeed, but the wasted troop in case I lose is not going to hurt my game because of its isolation". We should provide new players with some normal rules, but also encourage them for thinking creatively in order to spot the exceptions to those rules.



Very good to say the least.

In a mid sieve map 3v1 attacks are very good if the other person is leaving ones to spread your regions epically if there is not a attacker behind you. You adv a two leaving your attacker to pick his battles.


I do not know what a mid sieve map is. If you mean a corridor (very narrow) map, you are right. If you mean the entirely opposite (a very widespread map) you also have right under some circumstances.
It is ironic, but it is on very close or very open maps that 3 vs 1 attacks are many times good. In medium shaped maps, they are usualy a bad idea.



My iPad has a mind of its own. I ment mid sized map ha ha. But maybe that's a new word for map sizes. It really depends on the situation, like I said if your opponent has singles every where and you have 3s to attack to increase your regions it is a smart move to at least try once since you can only loose one troop. But it all depends like spoils or none ect. Classic is a perfect example. But you will do anything to get a kill 3v3 if needed at times. However a very small map attacking with a three is very stupid move.



I only partly agree. First of all, it is not only the size of the map, but also it's shape. If there are many fronts or not. Let me explain.
It is easy to find as many reasons as you like to make a 3 vs 1 attack. Surprisingly, it is much much more difficult to find reasons NOT to make a 3 vs 1 attack. As Jippd asked earlier, why would nt you want to make a 75% favourable attack? Basicaly there are only two reasons, albeit very serious ones.
1. You do not want to expose one of the regions, be it the attacking one or the attacked one, to a 4 vs 1 counterattack, which is more favourable than the one you just made.
2. You expect to increase your 3 vs 1 odds, by improving next round to a 4 vs 1 attack instead.

If none of the above applies (and you cannot think of another reason of not doing the attack), then you should do the attack.

In narrow corridor-style maps of the Feudal-Peloponesian style, no matter the size, none of the above two is a factor. The armies clash in 1-3 major fronts. Here, there are no worries of exposing an 1 if you do the 3 vs 1 attack and there is no way to improve to 4 vs 1 by avoiding the attack, the opponent will counterattack or, in best case senario, waste a single troop to improve to a 2. Not only there is no reason to make the 3 vs 1 attack, but it also allows you to favourably balance your army in case you win. You do not advance the surviving troop, you leave it behind. Then you make your reinforcement in the conquered area. Thus, you have lets say 6 in the front and 2 in the back, much superior to having 1-8 and one less region. (This logic is Peloponesian style, based upon the assumption that opponent will probably succeed in counterattacking by adding more than 10 troops)

In very wide maps, comes the point you and Jippd mentioned. The battle soon becomes very chaotic and, especialy in small maps, opponent will always have chances to attack 1s. In this case, you may, under circumstances, make the 3 vs 1 attacks. Basicaly, you want to compare the probability loss by making a 3 vs 1 attack that you could improve to 4 vs 1 next round to the possibility of gaining something tangible by conquering a reason, either being the drop from 15 to 14 or the more complicated foresight thinking Jippd mentioned. Basicaly, it gets more complex in wide maps. The world's best tend to avoid those attacks more often than not, but it is not entirely obvious, to me at least, if they are always right.

In more medium-shaped maps, like the classic 1 vs 1, where neutrals may narrow some fronts but widen some others, 3 vs 1 is usualy a bad idea whenever the rule of exposing a 1 applies. You have reasonable chances to keep your boarders full of 2s and if you can do that, then you should.
Conqueror Kaskavel
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:08 pm
Medals: 49
Conqueror Achievement (1) Monthly Leader Gold (1) Monthly Leader Silver (1) Monthly Leader Bronze (2) Most Improved Silver (1)
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (6)

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby Kaskavel on Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:39 am

In previous to last paragraph, I meant "especialy in BIG maps" and "by conquering a REGION"
Conqueror Kaskavel
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:08 pm
Medals: 49
Conqueror Achievement (1) Monthly Leader Gold (1) Monthly Leader Silver (1) Monthly Leader Bronze (2) Most Improved Silver (1)
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (6)

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby jltile1 on Thu Jun 14, 2012 1:17 am

Ok so my point exactly I would never attack a 3v1 if his troops are behind me. But if he leaves singles you attack adv a 2. Would not make the attack unless it helped me by cutting his regions or me picking some up. I would not attack with 11 regions to try for 12 when I know it will be broken easy. There are so many diff scenarios you can post as you did you prob could of came with 60. The point really is play smart and look at every game with all eyes open regions, bonus, and I can go on.
User avatar
Colonel jltile1
 
Posts: 608
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:12 pm
Location: Bay area
Medals: 54
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (5)

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby jonofperu on Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:01 pm

Loved the list ;)
User avatar
Brigadier jonofperu
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:57 am
Location: Peru
Medals: 72
Monthly Leader Gold (1) Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2)
Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Bot Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (8) Clan Achievement (14) Training Achievement (1) Challenge Achievement (4)

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby macbone on Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:58 am

Iron Butterfly wrote:Your list is redundant. You say stuff to say stuff so you can hit 30.


Yeah, but not too often. Nice list!
Last edited by macbone on Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Major macbone
SoC Training Instructor
SoC Training Instructor
 
Posts: 5545
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:12 pm
Location: Looking out over Victoria Harbor, thinking about Middle Earth and how good my wife looks
Medals: 81
Monthly Leader Bronze (1) Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3)
Terminator Achievement (3) Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2)
Random Map Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (8)
General Achievement (8) Clan Achievement (10) Training Achievement (2) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby Crazyirishman on Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:13 pm

it's fun watching generals argue about attacking.
User avatar
Captain Crazyirishman
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: Maine, North Carolina, Colorado or somewhere in between.
Medals: 46
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (7)

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby macbone on Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:52 pm

And informative, too! I'm taking notes. =)
User avatar
Major macbone
SoC Training Instructor
SoC Training Instructor
 
Posts: 5545
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:12 pm
Location: Looking out over Victoria Harbor, thinking about Middle Earth and how good my wife looks
Medals: 81
Monthly Leader Bronze (1) Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3)
Terminator Achievement (3) Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2)
Random Map Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (8)
General Achievement (8) Clan Achievement (10) Training Achievement (2) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby King Engineer on Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:15 am

Amazing list, I myself learnt a lot from it!
User avatar
Major King Engineer
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:39 pm
Medals: 36
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2)
Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2)
Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (1)
Clan Achievement (6) Training Achievement (1)

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby Heavy-D on Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:48 am

Kaskavel makes an excellent point. If you want to win consistently over an extended period of time, maps and scenarios then developing your thinking ability is key. If you want to have a higher than normal probability of winning on the same map repeatedly and redundantly then follow a text book.
General's are where they are as are Fueld Marshals and Majors and so on because of their ability to think. It's a lot like chess. Masters master openings and closings, Grand Masters master the ability to think.
Just my two cents.
Captain Heavy-D
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:45 am
Medals: 26
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby chang50 on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:38 am

Heavy-D wrote:Kaskavel makes an excellent point. If you want to win consistently over an extended period of time, maps and scenarios then developing your thinking ability is key. If you want to have a higher than normal probability of winning on the same map repeatedly and redundantly then follow a text book.
General's are where they are as are Fueld Marshals and Majors and so on because of their ability to think. It's a lot like chess. Masters master openings and closings, Grand Masters master the ability to think.
Just my two cents.


I agree totally,I wouldn't bother playing if I thought,as many seem to,that the game is nearly all down to luck.Of course with a dice based game,your personal luck will swing backwards and forwards,if you can't handle that,then maybe dice based games are not for you..
User avatar
Lieutenant chang50
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:54 am
Location: pattaya,thailand
Medals: 14
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1)

Re: Overall 1 v1 Strategy...

Postby Viceroy63 on Thu Jul 19, 2012 5:10 pm

Well I get General Kaskavel's point! If you limit your attacking to the odds of the dice then you basically throw away a whole lot of options in strategical play.

A couple of things could be considered repetitive such as 2, 3, 8 and 9 but a bonus is not always an objective. I found this list quite impressive and anyone who can come up with a list such as this to prove his word has to have a hell of a strategical mind.

I think that if we go into the specific details of this list, that even a book could be written and published.

Good work general.
Image
An Unproven Hypothesis; The Rise of Ignorance.
Ultimate Proof of Creation. Click the show tab below.
show
User avatar
Major Viceroy63
 
Posts: 1245
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 8:34 pm
Location: Where No One Has Gone Before.
Medals: 18
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (1)
Clan Achievement (1) Training Achievement (2) General Contribution (1)

Previous

Return to Strategy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron
Login