Oneyed wrote:I think it was good decision to make all map in English.
the bridges look nice, but I think the map is from modern era and they look as stone/wood bridges. maybe something modern or any of Moscow bridges should be better?
nolefan5311 wrote:We'll go ahead and get this one moved up to Graphics.
nolefan5311 wrote:I assume so. He hasn't posted with any concerns.
nolefan5311 wrote:I've pm'ed him about it and posted in the CA forums that I was getting ready to stamp it. You can PM him yourself and let him know you're not ready to move on to the next stage until you hear from him though. There's not really much more I can do.
koontz1973 wrote:cairnswk, these areas are now good in my opinion but you do need to polish them all up.
Title, good to see the whole thing now. But needs the polish.
Picture (top right) far better. Bottom rights sky is too light, darken that with some blue.
Bridges, some of the best and really work with this style.
The rest of the map, and that is everything, will need to be gone over with a fine tooth comb, changed altered and just generally brought up to standard. Sorry to be blunt about that.
iancanton wrote:sorry for the delay. i confirm nolefan's conclusion that the gameplay is solid, so u can feel free to progress the graphics without fear that the borders need to change for gameplay reasons. the only additional suggestions i have are for the green bonus to be reduced from +4 to +3 and for the inner ring neutrals to be amended from n3 to n2, both to encourage more play in the middle; these do not require graphic changes.
isaiah40 wrote:Before I make any comments on this, I have one question. What style/theme are you going for?
cairnswk wrote:isaiah40 wrote:Before I make any comments on this, I have one question. What style/theme are you going for?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests