Conquer Club

[CL4] Ph2 Div 1 - Winner: KoRT MVP: Mudfighter

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby Great-Ollie on Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:17 am

ahunda wrote:KORT, PACK & EMP are through.

IA & AOC battling over 4th spot.


Well congrats Empire and Kort on some well fought games! Se you in the finals. On a side note i am really impressed with Empires play after our clan war. They could have easily just fell apart but they have seemed to come back very strong which may =D> be bad news for us all in the final!
Major Great-Ollie
 
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:53 pm
Location: Great white north.
2233

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby Leehar on Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:41 pm

Thanks Ollie, we've also learnt to recognise you guys as some tough competitors ;)

Also, I'm still not exactly sure how it works, and I probably have no impact on the decision, but I'd like to nominate the following for MVP from Empire (as people who made my organising job so much easier with their brilliant performances :lol: ):

The retiring Dwilhelmi, who's an overall mvp candidate for the second successive year!
12 wins, 4 defeats

The stalwart mudfighter, who's been our silent assassin in steadily going about his business
10 wins (soon to be another with Imperium?!), and only 2 defeats! (I honestly think thats the best WP in the whole league!)

Probably the only other person who can combat our dominating duo, is the the Honourable Head CD, bruceswar, with a 15-5 record :(
show
User avatar
Colonel Leehar
 
Posts: 5484
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby betiko on Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:41 pm

Great-Ollie wrote:
ahunda wrote:KORT, PACK & EMP are through.

IA & AOC battling over 4th spot.


Well congrats Empire and Kort on some well fought games! Se you in the finals. On a side note i am really impressed with Empires play after our clan war. They could have easily just fell apart but they have seemed to come back very strong which may =D> be bad news for us all in the final!


mate, I think next round is still not the final; 2 get eliminated and then comes the round 4 which is the final :lol: :lol:
the format is a bit long like that imo..
Image
User avatar
Major betiko
 
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Location: location, location
22

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby betiko on Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:45 pm

Leehar wrote:Thanks Ollie, we've also learnt to recognise you guys as some tough competitors ;)

Also, I'm still not exactly sure how it works, and I probably have no impact on the decision, but I'd like to nominate the following for MVP from Empire (as people who made my organising job so much easier with their brilliant performances :lol: ):

The retiring Dwilhelmi, who's an overall mvp candidate for the second successive year!
12 wins, 4 defeats

The stalwart mudfighter, who's been our silent assassin in steadily going about his business
10 wins (soon to be another with Imperium?!), and only 2 defeats! (I honestly think thats the best WP in the whole league!)

Probably the only other person who can combat our dominating duo, is the the Honourable Head CD, bruceswar, with a 15-5 record :(


the best wp on our end is jghost7 with 9-2 so the best knwon wp is still mudfighter so far! ;)
Image
User avatar
Major betiko
 
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Location: location, location
22

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby Rodion on Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:17 pm

What are the rules for MVP?

Personally, I think it should be winning percentage after you control for a minimum number of games (so that someone with 1 game and 1 win is not awarded for his 100% performance).
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: SĆ£o Paulo, Brazil

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby josko.ri on Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:54 pm

in my opinion, the MVP player needs to play at least 50% of maximal games that he was able to play. in addition, I think Phase 1&2 should be considered together. that said, I think MVP player should be the one with the best winning % among all players who played 24 or more games (of 48 possible).
Image
User avatar
Major josko.ri
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:18 pm
35631611102

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby Rodion on Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:02 pm

I don't think Phase 1 should be considered as we all played against different opposition.

The 50% of maximum game rules is the one Lindax uses for TLO. That would be 14 out of 28.

Mudfighter would be ineligible with his 11-2, but we could give him a loss to complete the minimum of 14 and have him compete as an 11-3 (78.57% wins). I believe he would still win.
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: SĆ£o Paulo, Brazil

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby lord voldemort on Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:44 pm

Lol...his run is ridiculous...the minimum is alot though. I think we would only have 3-4 guys in our whole clan who actually played that many. We spread ours around alot and not rely on 1 or 2 individuals.
Though the general formula of win% after a minimum # of games is good
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby Chariot of Fire on Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:21 am

It's not really equitable to draw a comparison to the TLO's 50% game rule because the quota restrictions are so different. In the TLO a player can join as many as 6 of the 9 games each round (67%) whereas in the League the restrictions in place are for a maximum of 4 games out of the 12 (33%) and 10 players must be used to encourage greater diversity of participation. On this basis the net should be widened to accommodate those clans who have distributed the games more equitably between their players (but don't ask me what that figure should be). Another concept that proved successful in CL1 was to have a vote. Each clan submits its representative and a poll is created with the players' stats. This can be done in the CLA forum where there is no majority favouring one particular clan.
Image
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
User avatar
Colonel Chariot of Fire
 
Posts: 3599
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.

Update

Postby Teflon Kris on Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:17 am

Scores & Table updated.

8-)
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Teflon Kris
 
Posts: 4236
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby lord voldemort on Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:15 am

Chariot of Fire wrote:It's not really equitable to draw a comparison to the TLO's 50% game rule because the quota restrictions are so different. In the TLO a player can join as many as 6 of the 9 games each round (67%) whereas in the League the restrictions in place are for a maximum of 4 games out of the 12 (33%) and 10 players must be used to encourage greater diversity of participation. On this basis the net should be widened to accommodate those clans who have distributed the games more equitably between their players (but don't ask me what that figure should be). Another concept that proved successful in CL1 was to have a vote. Each clan submits its representative and a poll is created with the players' stats. This can be done in the CLA forum where there is no majority favouring one particular clan.

Votes can be still biased. Id rather go purely on stats
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: SCORE UPDATE

Postby tokle on Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:08 am

Round 1:
PACK 8-4 TOFU
AOC 5-6 IA
AFOS 5-7 EMP
TSM 5-7 KORT

Round 2:
IA 5-7 PACK
EMP 5-7 TOFU
KORT 7-5 AOC
TSM 4-8 AFOS

Round 3:
PACK 4-8 EMP
IA 4-8 KORT
TOFU 6-6 TSM
AOC 8-4 AFOS

Round 4:
KORT 7-5 PACK
TSM 6-6 EMP
AFOS 5-7 IA
AOC 4-7 TOFU

Round 5:
PACK 4-8 TSM
KORT 5-7 AFOS
EMP 4-8 AOC
IA 8-4 TOFU

Round 6:
AFOS 2-10 PACK
AOC 7-5 TSM
TOFU 6-6 KORT
IA 4-8 EMP

Round 7:
PACK 7-5 AOC
AFOS 6-5 TOFU
TSM 5-7 IA
KORT 6-6 EMP
Last edited by tokle on Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Major tokle
 
Posts: 2910
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:11 am

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby jetsetwilly on Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:18 pm

Leehar wrote:Conquer Rome is holding us up I think ;)
Can't decide 3rd/4th without it, and it's been going since the first week!


Not only was it the first week, it was the first game created in this division !
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jetsetwilly
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:31 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby lynch5762 on Fri Jul 20, 2012 7:58 pm

jetsetwilly wrote:
Leehar wrote:Conquer Rome is holding us up I think ;)
Can't decide 3rd/4th without it, and it's been going since the first week!


Not only was it the first week, it was the first game created in this division !


That's hilarious... first game started will probably be the last one finished
Image
Captain lynch5762
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:13 pm

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby betiko on Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:54 am

jetsetwilly wrote:
Leehar wrote:Conquer Rome is holding us up I think ;)
Can't decide 3rd/4th without it, and it's been going since the first week!


Not only was it the first week, it was the first game created in this division !


and is it leaning one way now?
Image
User avatar
Major betiko
 
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Location: location, location
22

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby jetsetwilly on Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:44 am

betiko wrote:
jetsetwilly wrote:
Leehar wrote:Conquer Rome is holding us up I think ;)
Can't decide 3rd/4th without it, and it's been going since the first week!


Not only was it the first week, it was the first game created in this division !


and is it leaning one way now?


It's taken a heavy tilt in our direction but no fowl on our abacus yet, there have been too many swings already.

Could you have scripted a better finish to this phase than to have 1 game decide which of those 2 clans would take the final spot. (and for those 2 clans to be last year's finalists)
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jetsetwilly
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:31 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby usernamer on Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:31 am

betiko wrote:
jetsetwilly wrote:
Leehar wrote:Conquer Rome is holding us up I think ;)
Can't decide 3rd/4th without it, and it's been going since the first week!


Not only was it the first week, it was the first game created in this division !


and is it leaning one way now?


Yeah, it's looking like a reasonably sure AOC victory now.
Hats off to IA for putting up an awesome fight. Great game. Loved it :)
Major usernamer
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 12:43 pm
Location: England

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby betiko on Sun Jul 22, 2012 4:55 am

congrats to AOC then! kort-pack-empire-AOC for phase 3 then!

when is it schedueled?
Image
User avatar
Major betiko
 
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Location: location, location
22

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby jetsetwilly on Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:40 am

betiko wrote:congrats to AOC then! kort-pack-empire-AOC for phase 3 then!

when is it schedueled?


Thanks Betiko.

Same question, to the organisers, when will we get the phase 3 timeline ?
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jetsetwilly
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:31 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby Great-Ollie on Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:49 am

What is really funny about this is that if we all played the same series again i bet AFOS, TSM, IA, and TOFU would probably be moving on! It all came down to some luck for most of us advancing, well done, and i hope we can remain lucky for the finals! :lol: =D>
Major Great-Ollie
 
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:53 pm
Location: Great white north.
2233

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby jetsetwilly on Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:57 am

Great-Ollie wrote:What is really funny about this is that if we all played the same series again i bet AFOS, TSM, IA, and TOFU would probably be moving on! It all came down to some luck for most of us advancing, well done, and i hope we can remain lucky for the finals! :lol: =D>


Yeah, there's clearly very little between any of the top 8, it's great that we have such a large group of competitive clans.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jetsetwilly
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:31 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby EagleByRob on Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:45 am

Game 10927118 - game is over --- finally! gg all
User avatar
Sergeant EagleByRob
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:15 am

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby Swifte on Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:59 am

Well played guys. Congrats to all those advancing. This was a fun event!
User avatar
Colonel Swifte
 
Posts: 2474
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:05 pm
Location: usually Mahgreb
3

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby Dako on Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:34 pm

Just some 29 rounds. :)
Image
User avatar
Colonel Dako
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:07 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Postby Leehar on Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:58 pm

At least we can be relieved a 30 round limit would have been useless ;)
show
User avatar
Colonel Leehar
 
Posts: 5484
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Location: Johannesburg

PreviousNext

Return to Complete Challenges

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users