Moderators: Discussions Team, Global Moderators
john9blue wrote:i hope dave and sultan have a contest to see who can chug a gallon of bleach faster
Iliad wrote:john9blue wrote:i hope dave and sultan have a contest to see who can chug a gallon of bleach faster
But libertarians are famous for their compassion and great social ability, it's such a shame john's defying that stereotype.
It's also really amusing that Atlas Shrugged has been bitchslapped by the invisible hand of the free market.

Iliad wrote:But libertarians are famous for their compassion and great social ability, it's such a shame john's defying that stereotype.
It's also really amusing that Atlas Shrugged has been bitchslapped by the invisible hand of the free market.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
thegreekdog wrote:I will be purchasing Beezelbub's Tales to his Grandson immediately! Thanks AoG!
xeno wrote:we read all this shit in high school. and it was just that, shit
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
The Wet Nurse embodies the collectivist world in which he was trained. Although he has a degree in metallurgy, he has no practical skills. He merely repeats things he has been told and uses words cleverly so as not to say anything clearly. He is taken aback by Rearden’s insistence on calling things exactly what they are. His job is to determine Rearden’s output so that it is in compliance with the laws. But without the laws, there would be no need for his job in the first place. Rand, a strong proponent of unfettered capitalism, uses him to demonstrate the absurd ways in which bureaucracy fuels its own growth and the waste and foolishness required to keep an artificial system running. In a capitalist system, Rearden would be free to produce as much steel as his customers require, and they would be free to buy it or to go elsewhere if he could not give them what they wanted. For Rand, the simplicity of free markets stands in obvious contrast to the complex bureaucratic structures seen here.
Phatscotty wrote: [Atlas Shrugged] it's the World's #2 most influential western book behind the Bible.

VioIet wrote:you are not classy enough for me niet
i know the vulgarness that you are capable of
nietzsche wrote:Phatscotty wrote: [Atlas Shrugged] it's the World's #2 most influential western book behind the Bible.
ROFL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
is this guy for serious???????????
HAHAHAHAHHAA
1991, a survey by the Library of Congress and the Book of the Month Club found that readers rated "Atlas" as the second-most influential book, behind only the Bible
The Library of Congress is the research library of the United States Congress, de facto national library of the United States of America, and the oldest federal cultural institution in the United States. Located in four buildings in Washington, D.C., as well as the Packard Campus[2] in Culpeper, Virginia, it is the largest library in the world by shelf space and number of books.
Phatscotty wrote:I saw it yesterday, I am going to see it again today, and I regret not having read the book earlier. I have always wished there was a book like this available, I guess I just needed to get over the size of it and figure there is a reason why it's the World's #2 most influential western book behind the Bible.

VioIet wrote:you are not classy enough for me niet
i know the vulgarness that you are capable of
nietzsche wrote:Dude, if that's the logic you use in all of your posts/threads/discussions... lol
There's no way to defend what you said.
One could just shut up had that been said by someone else, but the way you push you agenda and claim knowledge of the world and the economy and stuff, I had to say something.
It shows how little your perspective is, and your intent to further defend it shows also how you would go to inexplicable lengths in order not to lose a point.
I'm going to quote you here again, because knowing you, you will go and edit the post so that I end up like a fool:
Phatscotty wrote:nietzsche wrote:Dude, if that's the logic you use in all of your posts/threads/discussions... lol
There's no way to defend what you said.
One could just shut up had that been said by someone else, but the way you push you agenda and claim knowledge of the world and the economy and stuff, I had to say something.
It shows how little your perspective is, and your intent to further defend it shows also how you would go to inexplicable lengths in order not to lose a point.
I'm going to quote you here again, because knowing you, you will go and edit the post so that I end up like a fool:
It's not logic...it's a source. It's not my credibility, it's the Library of Congress's.
My opinion has nothing to do with anything, I have not offered any opinion, or perspective, nor any intent. There are no points to be made or lost, it was just a simple statement.
You can ignore it if you want, but trolling the messenger won't accomplish anything.

VioIet wrote:you are not classy enough for me niet
i know the vulgarness that you are capable of
Return to One Does Not Simply Walk Into The Forums
Users browsing this forum: kentington, mviola, ooge, Timminz and 1 guest