Moderator: Community Team
Nobunaga wrote:... The President wins yet another sterling endorsement from a socialist dictator, one who quite recently proved to the world that democratic elections function well under dictatorial control.
... With this kind of support, how can we even begin to question Obama's place as our rightful leader?
http://times247.com/articles/obama-rece ... -dictators
... FOUR MORE YEARS!!
Nobunaga wrote:... The President wins yet another sterling endorsement from a socialist dictator, one who quite recently proved to the world that democratic elections function well under dictatorial control.
... With this kind of support, how can we even begin to question Obama's place as our rightful leader?
http://times247.com/articles/obama-rece ... -dictators
... FOUR MORE YEARS!!
...
Woodruff wrote:Nobunaga wrote:... The President wins yet another sterling endorsement from a socialist dictator, one who quite recently proved to the world that democratic elections function well under dictatorial control.
... With this kind of support, how can we even begin to question Obama's place as our rightful leader?
http://times247.com/articles/obama-rece ... -dictators
... FOUR MORE YEARS!!
The desperation is palpable.
bedub1 wrote:I heard that Hitler, Moa Tse Tung, Joseph Stalin, and the Zetas Cartel in Mexico all endorse rMoney.
patrickaa317 wrote:bedub1 wrote:I heard that Hitler, Moa Tse Tung, Joseph Stalin, and the Zetas Cartel in Mexico all endorse rMoney.
I don't follow the Mexican cartels much but from your comment, I must assume the Zetas are not the ones that got free guns from the Eric Holder and the Obama Administration. Is that correct?
Symmetry wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:bedub1 wrote:I heard that Hitler, Moa Tse Tung, Joseph Stalin, and the Zetas Cartel in Mexico all endorse rMoney.
I don't follow the Mexican cartels much but from your comment, I must assume the Zetas are not the ones that got free guns from the Eric Holder and the Obama Administration. Is that correct?
Wasn't that a Bush administration policy? Sure it continued under Obama, who cancelled it when the news of it came out, but still, bit harsh to blame Obama for a Republican policy he ended.
patrickaa317 wrote:Symmetry wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:bedub1 wrote:I heard that Hitler, Moa Tse Tung, Joseph Stalin, and the Zetas Cartel in Mexico all endorse rMoney.
I don't follow the Mexican cartels much but from your comment, I must assume the Zetas are not the ones that got free guns from the Eric Holder and the Obama Administration. Is that correct?
Wasn't that a Bush administration policy? Sure it continued under Obama, who cancelled it when the news of it came out, but still, bit harsh to blame Obama for a Republican policy he ended.
Fast and Furious was launched in 2009, Bush wasn't in office at that time (a smaller scale of gun-walking was done under his watch though). Fast and Furious greatly increased the volume of gun-walking weapons and 1700 of 2000 guns that were allowed across the border between 2009-2011 are unaccounted for. To give Obama any positive credit for such a horrible policy, where both him and Bush are to blame is completely ridiculous.
Nobunaga wrote:... That's funny. You don't like what it says so... you attack the source and make absurd attempts at comedy.
... Woody, I am not desperate. Your man has his ass handed to him once again tonight... I think it's a wrap.
Symmetry wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:Symmetry wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:bedub1 wrote:I heard that Hitler, Moa Tse Tung, Joseph Stalin, and the Zetas Cartel in Mexico all endorse rMoney.
I don't follow the Mexican cartels much but from your comment, I must assume the Zetas are not the ones that got free guns from the Eric Holder and the Obama Administration. Is that correct?
Wasn't that a Bush administration policy? Sure it continued under Obama, who cancelled it when the news of it came out, but still, bit harsh to blame Obama for a Republican policy he ended.
Fast and Furious was launched in 2009, Bush wasn't in office at that time (a smaller scale of gun-walking was done under his watch though). Fast and Furious greatly increased the volume of gun-walking weapons and 1700 of 2000 guns that were allowed across the border between 2009-2011 are unaccounted for. To give Obama any positive credit for such a horrible policy, where both him and Bush are to blame is completely ridiculous.
I misunderestimated your attempt to derail the thread, and assumed that you were talking about the Bush era policy of selling guns to drug cartels.
Fast and Furious, was, of course an Obama era policy name for the ATF gunwalking scandal. I'd give Obama credit for shutting the thing down. Not fast or furiously enough, but shut it down he did.
Woodruff wrote:Nobunaga wrote:... That's funny. You don't like what it says so... you attack the source and make absurd attempts at comedy.
... Woody, I am not desperate. Your man has his ass handed to him once again tonight... I think it's a wrap.
"My man" in the election isn't even male and wasn't invited to the debate tonight, so I'm pretty sure you have no idea what you're talking about. That being said, "my man" will be in a debate with three other candidates (who weren't afraid to meet with her, whereas Romney was) tonight.
Nobunaga wrote:Woodruff wrote:Nobunaga wrote:... That's funny. You don't like what it says so... you attack the source and make absurd attempts at comedy.
... Woody, I am not desperate. Your man has his ass handed to him once again tonight... I think it's a wrap.
"My man" in the election isn't even male and wasn't invited to the debate tonight, so I'm pretty sure you have no idea what you're talking about. That being said, "my man" will be in a debate with three other candidates (who weren't afraid to meet with her, whereas Romney was) tonight.
... Woody, you're voting 3rd party?
... I retract my previous and apologize, having embarrassed myself.
...
Symmetry wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:Symmetry wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:bedub1 wrote:I heard that Hitler, Moa Tse Tung, Joseph Stalin, and the Zetas Cartel in Mexico all endorse rMoney.
I don't follow the Mexican cartels much but from your comment, I must assume the Zetas are not the ones that got free guns from the Eric Holder and the Obama Administration. Is that correct?
Wasn't that a Bush administration policy? Sure it continued under Obama, who cancelled it when the news of it came out, but still, bit harsh to blame Obama for a Republican policy he ended.
Fast and Furious was launched in 2009, Bush wasn't in office at that time (a smaller scale of gun-walking was done under his watch though). Fast and Furious greatly increased the volume of gun-walking weapons and 1700 of 2000 guns that were allowed across the border between 2009-2011 are unaccounted for. To give Obama any positive credit for such a horrible policy, where both him and Bush are to blame is completely ridiculous.
I misunderestimated your attempt to derail the thread, and assumed that you were talking about the Bush era policy of selling guns to drug cartels.
Fast and Furious, was, of course an Obama era policy name for the ATF gunwalking scandal. I'd give Obama credit for shutting the thing down. Not fast or furiously enough, but shut it down he did.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Juan_Bottom wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:It may also be the size of our economy and our involvement in every nation on the globe.
thegreekdog wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:It may also be the size of our economy and our involvement in every nation on the globe.
The president has not given any indication he would reduce our involvement in every nation on the globe. I wish that was one campaign promise he would have kept.
Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:It may also be the size of our economy and our involvement in every nation on the globe.
The president has not given any indication he would reduce our involvement in every nation on the globe. I wish that was one campaign promise he would have kept.
You mean economically? That's kind of a weird thing to say.
thegreekdog wrote:Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:It may also be the size of our economy and our involvement in every nation on the globe.
The president has not given any indication he would reduce our involvement in every nation on the globe. I wish that was one campaign promise he would have kept.
You mean economically? That's kind of a weird thing to say.
No, I mean militarily.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: pmac666