To tackle this I'm going to pull together each quote I can find from you over the past 10 pages of this thread (turns out there's only 2 I could find skim reading through) and quote them here to try and give a good sense of your argument. Then I'll give you a chance to add anything else you would like to add, or correct anything you feel you have misrepresented about your position in any of the posts. Then I'll show you why you're wrong
The Moon's Dust
Interplanetary dust and meteors is depositing dust on the moon at the rate of at least 14,300,000 tons per year. At this rate, if the moon were 4.5 billion years old there would be at least 440 feet of dust on the moon. The astronauts, however, found a layer only 1/8 to three inches thick. Three inches would take only 8000 years. Even evolutionists believe the moon is the same age as the earth, giving the earth's age as only 8000 years.
Concerning the moon and dust?
If you figure there is going to be a bunch of dust on something based on how old you think it is and how fast you think dust is collecting on it and you come to find there is barely any dust on it at all, is it more logical to assume the dust gathered alot slower than you thought than to consider a possibility that the something is younger than you thought?
Even if Snelling and Rush came forward and claimed that one or more thing was consistent with a current meteoritic dust influx rate operating over the evolutionistsā timescale, was there not very real concern about moon dust in the 1950s and 1960s? Just how much would an estimate be off even if the moon has less gravitational pull than the earth? Do you think 4,300,000 tons is a number came up with by some random guy trying to pick up moon dust with his hand on a mountain without considering differences between the sun and moon if Isaac Asimov actually published stuff in Science Digest? And what was simply Asimov?
"I get a picture, therefore, of the first spaceship, picking out a nice level place for landing purposes, coming in slowly downward tail-first and sinking majestically out of sight. Isaac Asimov, ā14 Million Tons of Dust Per Year,ā Science Digest, J-nuary 1959, p. 36."
"Lyttleton felt that dust from only the erosion of exposed Moon rocks by ultraviolet light and x-rays ācould during the age of the moon be sufficient to form a layer over it several miles deep.ā Raymond A. Lyttleton, The Modern Universe (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1956), p. 72."
"Thomas Gold proposed that thick layers of dust accumulated in the lunar maria. [See Thomas Gold, āThe Lunar Surface,ā Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society of London, Vol. 115, 1955, pp. 585ā604.]"
"Fears about the dust thickness lessened when instruments were sent to the Moon from 1964 to 1968. However, some concern still remained, at least in Neil Armstrongās mind, as he stepped on the Moon. [See transcript of conversations from the Moon, Chicago Tribune, 21 July 1969, Section 1, p. 1, and Paul D. Ackerman, Itās a Young World After All (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1986), p. 19.]"
-http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes79.html
"Moon Dust
I have right here on the floorāsince I am in my home city hereāI have an actual porthole from a space capsule. It is so pitted, you can hardly see through it. Now, we have added a few more scratches through the years hauling this thing around. But, it was all pitted when they first took it out of the space capsule because out of space is full of dust. Imagine blasting off with all that! The reason it is pitted is because outer space is full of dust. And when they are traveling around at 18,000 miles an hour, they run into the dust and it hits the glass. Well, the earth and the moon are running around togetherātheyāre running around the sun at about 66,000 miles an hour. So the earth and the moon are running into all this dust in space. Kind of like your windshield collects bugs certain times of the year, and it gets thicker and thicker on the surface of the moon and on the earth, this dust does, because it is running into it. The problem is, on earth we have air, which makes wind and water and any dust that lands here gets mixed in. Once in awhile you will see a little bit on your furniture from time to time. How many have seen [some] of that before? This cosmic dust coming in from outer space generally gets incorporated into soil. But on the moon they have no wind and no water. So any dust that lands on the moon is going to be undisturbed.
OK that's your two posts about moon dust. Do they fully represent your argument on this particular subject or would you like to add / amend anything?
If you want to pick a different topic then fine, but spell out your argument from the start please so we can keep it all nicely contained.