Conquer Club

F-400 Rankings with 1 year instead of 2 years

Abandoned challenges and other old information.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: F-400 Rankings with 1 year instead of 2 years

Postby Leehar on Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:07 am

i thought the history went back 6 years?
show
User avatar
Colonel Leehar
 
Posts: 5484
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: F-400 Rankings with 1 year instead of 2 years

Postby Dako on Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:34 am

War value decays 25% every 6 months.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Dako
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:07 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia

Re: F-400 Rankings with 1 year instead of 2 years

Postby laughingcavalier on Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:46 am

There is an easy way to test this, at least at the top of the table.
6 of the top 7 clans under the one year system are playing each other currently.
TOFU, TSM, Empire get their best or the same ranking position on a 2 year ranking.
PACK, AFOS,AOC get their best places under a 1 year ranking
So if TOFU beat PACK
Empire beat AOC
TSM beat AFOS
The 2 year ranking is a more accurate reflection of the relative strength of clans
But if
PACK beat TOFU
AOC beat EMP
AFOS beat TSM
Then the 1 year ranking is better
Image
Major laughingcavalier
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: F-400 Rankings with 1 year instead of 2 years

Postby DoomYoshi on Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:22 pm

I disagree that you can extrapolate that to the rest of the clans.
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10715
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: F-400 Rankings with 1 year instead of 2 years

Postby Foxglove on Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:38 pm

laughingcavalier wrote:There is an easy way to test this, at least at the top of the table.


DoomYoshi wrote:I disagree that you can extrapolate that to the rest of the clans.


He pretty clearly said that the test was for the top of the table.

And very good point, LC! We will see. :)

Incidentally, anyone who is willing to do enough data mining can probably determine which formula is more accurate based on the past year's results. If you calculate the 1-year results for the past 12-15 months, you can determine whether or not the 1-year or 2-year formula more accurately predicted the winners of the previous year's challenges.
Brigadier Foxglove
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:05 pm

Re: F-400 Rankings with 1 year instead of 2 years

Postby benga on Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:44 pm

The thing is, that 1year ranking better reflects current form of clans.

The 2 year is better for overall ranking.
User avatar
Sergeant benga
 
Posts: 6925
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 pm

Previous

Return to Clan Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users