It is hard to bring something completely different, but you managed it!!
Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators


generalhead wrote:On the Austrum map Is your troops +1 legend a different color or opacity than the rest of the legends?



BisdeCapri wrote:Beautiful !
nolefan5311 wrote:We'll go ahead and get this one moved on up to the the MFW. Congrats koontz...

generalhead wrote:I think your winning conditions and your decay are worded good. The only thing that is confusing is the min-3. Do you need to have that in there?


DoomYoshi wrote:Can we have more interesting names for the territories than OT1 etc. These have the potential to be really rich maps, but that is holding me back from accepting them as the successor to AoR.

koontz1973 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Can we have more interesting names for the territories than OT1 etc. These have the potential to be really rich maps, but that is holding me back from accepting them as the successor to AoR.
Adding Latin names as we speak. These where always place holders to see if any interest was to be found. Also, it made the bonus regions easier to find and understand as I do not want to colour the land more than glows.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests