Moderator: Community Team
blakebowling wrote:Split from the announcement.
I believe there is a similar suggestion. If someone finds it, could you please link it here so I can merge.
It’s not perhaps a sentiment one has too often in life, but it can be said without hesitation that the past year or so has been a good one for popular accounts of the lives of 17th-century English polymaths.
AussieLighthorse wrote:AussieLighthorse› POINTS FOR BEING 2ND AND 3RD....i think points should be given for being there at the end of the game instead of the winner getting all.. i am ususally the last to go but get no recognition for that...in real life that would always be taken into consideration.
Funkyterrance wrote:This would be nice but I remember someone bringing this one up in the past and some others argued that it would just encourage secret diplomacy/multis which stands to reason. At least now only one cheater gets the points.
betiko wrote:that is dumb as hell. finishing 5th or 2nd is the same, you lost. if players start playing for something else than winning it would change the whole game strategy, games would last forever and would be a real lame game. just play terminator games then.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users