NP, I knew you were busy with UNI so I thought I'd ask how it was going and give you a little more time. So you have 10 min to get another update posted! jk!
isaiah40 wrote:NP, I knew you were busy with UNI so I thought I'd ask how it was going and give you a little more time. So you have 10 min to get another update posted! jk!
Nice one isaiah40...i thought i left school years ago Actually, right now i am working in illustrator to put new proper rail lines on Rail Europe....now that i know how to do it.
cairnswk wrote:Actually, right now i am working in illustrator to put new proper rail lines on Rail Europe....now that i know how to do it.
Do I hear a Rail Europe minor revamp coming soon!?
Well, yes, only the rail lines at present, but if there is other things that need attending to i could be up for the challenge if they are given to me quickly.
Back to topic... While i contemplate my navel...and the changes i have to make...i have addressed iancanton's issues in this latest update
iancanton wrote:in the +11 bonus description, it's a monarch's commander. in the losing conditions text, it's a commander's monarch. which is it meant to be?
cairnswk wrote:They should all read Monarch's Commander...
except in Conditional Borders Any Monarch's Commander can be ...
I have changed this to read...makes much more sense to me the way i read it. Conditional Borders: * A Monarch position (M) can be assaulted only if one region of the same Monarch Commander's Vessel is held
Mmmm, seems no-one is interested in giving feedback on the size... anyway, we'll push on.
Version 26
I've downsized the bottom corners to normal border size...which enables me to move the Treasury section down...thus giving more space to the map itself. So i moved things around (mainly down) so that the top of the map wasn't so cramped. Hope this is an improvement. I've also decided not to put this through PS, as i've redone all the major straight lines so they are good and shouldn't have the blur issue.
cairns, why do some of the territ lines have different opacity? Bridgewater to Bristol looks different to Bridgewater to Poole Land and again different from some of the others. The same goes for the beacon paths. Left side of the board looks lighter than the right side. Is their a reason for this that I missed?
koontz1973 wrote:cairns, why do some of the territ lines have different opacity? Bridgewater to Bristol looks different to Bridgewater to Poole Land and again different from some of the others. The same goes for the beacon paths. Left side of the board looks lighter than the right side. Is their a reason for this that I missed?
Either way, all looks rather splendid to me.
koontz...good pickup, thank-you...pls refresh the above image. all should be better now
Better thanks, but some of the attack lines for the beacons now show in the boxes. Thuro land base, black line at the to middle. I know it is for the sea but my eye is now drawn to it.
koontz1973 wrote:Better thanks, but some of the attack lines for the beacons now show in the boxes. Thuro land base, black line at the to middle. I know it is for the sea but my eye is now drawn to it.
Yeh, not worried anout the attacklines in the beacon boxes...i'll fix later truro land base black line top middle is coastline...not important...