Conquer Club

Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!

Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby DoomYoshi on Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:32 am

Recently, my usergroup was deleted.

Apparently, one post per month is enough to keep it alive. I think if mods are taking the time to delete usergroups, there should be a button for the threads to just be put into a huge folder where the threads can be looked up for posterity.
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10715
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby agentcom on Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:00 am

I saw your post in Q&A about this and it struck me as odd. Considering the moderator policy around here is pretty much to NEVER DELETE ANYTHING, I'm real surprised that entire usergroups and their fora would be "disappeared" like that without even archiving them. I can't claim that I know what the actual policy on this is. Perhaps we can get another mod to stop by and enlighten us :)
User avatar
Brigadier agentcom
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby greenoaks on Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:31 am

it really pissed me off when they deleted the usergroup for sig making, the Sigatur Lounge.

i posted a request for help with something just before it was deleted but that wasn't enough.

that subforum was full of great threads explaining how to do different graphics or where to get fonts.

it wasn't always a place to go to post but often a place to go to read, like a library - but's gone now.

:(
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby agentcom on Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:05 pm

greenoaks wrote:it really pissed me off when they deleted the usergroup for sig making, the Sigatur Lounge.

i posted a request for help with something just before it was deleted but that wasn't enough.

that subforum was full of great threads explaining how to do different graphics or where to get fonts.

it wasn't always a place to go to post but often a place to go to read, like a library - but's gone now.

:(


And doom's was the experimental gamers forum, I believe. I'm sure there was interesting reading there, too. The more I hear about it, the more odd I think that it is given the non-deletion policy that we have. If these are truly being deleted without being archived, that is a shame.

As for archiving, I don't know what phpbb allows, but I can think of at least one other forum that I've seen that archives old topics into sort of a condensed, text-only simplified view. It's not the prettiest thing, but it seems like a reasonable compromise.
User avatar
Brigadier agentcom
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby blakebowling on Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:21 pm

They're deleted to keep the page from overflowing in the control panel, I believe. When I looked into a clans/usergroup update, this was something I addressed. It's also possible that the forums simply be hidden and not deleted completely.
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5096
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby chapcrap on Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:49 am

blakebowling wrote:They're deleted to keep the page from overflowing in the control panel, I believe. When I looked into a clans/usergroup update, this was something I addressed. It's also possible that the forums simply be hidden and not deleted completely.

I'm pretty sure it's deleted. I remember greenoaks posting about it in Q&A when it was deleted and he was basically told sorry.
Lieutenant chapcrap
 
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby blakebowling on Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:24 am

chapcrap wrote:
blakebowling wrote:They're deleted to keep the page from overflowing in the control panel, I believe. When I looked into a clans/usergroup update, this was something I addressed. It's also possible that the forums simply be hidden and not deleted completely.

I'm pretty sure it's deleted. I remember greenoaks posting about it in Q&A when it was deleted and he was basically told sorry.

I'm saying it's possible for them to hide them instead of deleting them. I know the current process is to delete them.
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5096
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby chapcrap on Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:42 am

blakebowling wrote:
chapcrap wrote:
blakebowling wrote:They're deleted to keep the page from overflowing in the control panel, I believe. When I looked into a clans/usergroup update, this was something I addressed. It's also possible that the forums simply be hidden and not deleted completely.

I'm pretty sure it's deleted. I remember greenoaks posting about it in Q&A when it was deleted and he was basically told sorry.

I'm saying it's possible for them to hide them instead of deleting them. I know the current process is to delete them.

Oh, ok. Well, that would certainly be better, IMO.
Lieutenant chapcrap
 
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby DoomYoshi on Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 pm

Ok, submitted?
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10715
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby agentcom on Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:31 pm

It's possible that a lot of space is actually cleared up by the deleting of these threads. I mean the policy is surely in place for a reason. Also, I'm not sure that we need to archive everything. But I don't have all the info. I guess what I'd like to hear is what the exact policy is for deleting old threads/groups. Do any of the mods who stop by know exactly what the policy and procedure are? If not, I can post a question in the mod forum and hopefully get an answer.

I feel like we need to know what the policy is currently before we can start talking about how to change it.
User avatar
Brigadier agentcom
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby Dukasaur on Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:44 pm

agentcom wrote:It's possible that a lot of space is actually cleared up by the deleting of these threads. I mean the policy is surely in place for a reason. Also, I'm not sure that we need to archive everything. But I don't have all the info. I guess what I'd like to hear is what the exact policy is for deleting old threads/groups. Do any of the mods who stop by know exactly what the policy and procedure are? If not, I can post a question in the mod forum and hopefully get an answer.

I feel like we need to know what the policy is currently before we can start talking about how to change it.

I don't honestly know the reason, but I do have a theory. Until one of the techies drops by with a better explanation, consider this:

The problem is not storage space. In today's world binary storage space is ludicrously cheap, and as you've pointed out we have huge archival subfora full of nothing but old junk that nobody looks at.

The problem is checking permissions. For every limited-access subforum, the server has to check whether you have permission to enter every single time that it does something like look for your unread posts in order to populate your main forum index. This, I think, is a fairly time-consuming check for the server. (Time-consuming in computer terms. Probably a matter of microseconds, but all those microseconds add up.) We delete old usergroups not to save the trivial amount of space those messages take up, but to save the CPU cycles that it takes to constantly check who can look into those usergroups and who cannot.

It's a shame to lose stuff like the Siggattar Lounge and Experimental Gamers. I'd like to see this problem resolved, but myself I don't know enough to suggest a solution.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Lieutenant Dukasaur
Community Coordinator
Community Coordinator
 
Posts: 26970
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby greenoaks on Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:41 pm

it would be good is we could salvage some threads and junk the rest
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby blakebowling on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:20 am

Dukasaur wrote:
agentcom wrote:It's possible that a lot of space is actually cleared up by the deleting of these threads. I mean the policy is surely in place for a reason. Also, I'm not sure that we need to archive everything. But I don't have all the info. I guess what I'd like to hear is what the exact policy is for deleting old threads/groups. Do any of the mods who stop by know exactly what the policy and procedure are? If not, I can post a question in the mod forum and hopefully get an answer.

I feel like we need to know what the policy is currently before we can start talking about how to change it.

I don't honestly know the reason, but I do have a theory. Until one of the techies drops by with a better explanation, consider this:

The problem is not storage space. In today's world binary storage space is ludicrously cheap, and as you've pointed out we have huge archival subfora full of nothing but old junk that nobody looks at.

The problem is checking permissions. For every limited-access subforum, the server has to check whether you have permission to enter every single time that it does something like look for your unread posts in order to populate your main forum index. This, I think, is a fairly time-consuming check for the server. (Time-consuming in computer terms. Probably a matter of microseconds, but all those microseconds add up.) We delete old usergroups not to save the trivial amount of space those messages take up, but to save the CPU cycles that it takes to constantly check who can look into those usergroups and who cannot.

It's a shame to lose stuff like the Siggattar Lounge and Experimental Gamers. I'd like to see this problem resolved, but myself I don't know enough to suggest a solution.

To an extent this is true. However from what I've been told, the issue lies with the cluttering of the admin interface when filled with many groups / group forums.
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5096
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby DoomYoshi on Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:58 am

Why not merge the threads into a dusty corner of GD that everyone can look at?
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10715
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby Metsfanmax on Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:13 am

blakebowling wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
agentcom wrote:It's possible that a lot of space is actually cleared up by the deleting of these threads. I mean the policy is surely in place for a reason. Also, I'm not sure that we need to archive everything. But I don't have all the info. I guess what I'd like to hear is what the exact policy is for deleting old threads/groups. Do any of the mods who stop by know exactly what the policy and procedure are? If not, I can post a question in the mod forum and hopefully get an answer.

I feel like we need to know what the policy is currently before we can start talking about how to change it.

I don't honestly know the reason, but I do have a theory. Until one of the techies drops by with a better explanation, consider this:

The problem is not storage space. In today's world binary storage space is ludicrously cheap, and as you've pointed out we have huge archival subfora full of nothing but old junk that nobody looks at.

The problem is checking permissions. For every limited-access subforum, the server has to check whether you have permission to enter every single time that it does something like look for your unread posts in order to populate your main forum index. This, I think, is a fairly time-consuming check for the server. (Time-consuming in computer terms. Probably a matter of microseconds, but all those microseconds add up.) We delete old usergroups not to save the trivial amount of space those messages take up, but to save the CPU cycles that it takes to constantly check who can look into those usergroups and who cannot.

It's a shame to lose stuff like the Siggattar Lounge and Experimental Gamers. I'd like to see this problem resolved, but myself I don't know enough to suggest a solution.

To an extent this is true. However from what I've been told, the issue lies with the cluttering of the admin interface when filled with many groups / group forums.


Now that you are red, can we get an update on possibly changing this policy?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Archive Disbanded Usergroups instead of Deletion

Postby blakebowling on Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:23 am

Metsfanmax wrote:
blakebowling wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
agentcom wrote:It's possible that a lot of space is actually cleared up by the deleting of these threads. I mean the policy is surely in place for a reason. Also, I'm not sure that we need to archive everything. But I don't have all the info. I guess what I'd like to hear is what the exact policy is for deleting old threads/groups. Do any of the mods who stop by know exactly what the policy and procedure are? If not, I can post a question in the mod forum and hopefully get an answer.

I feel like we need to know what the policy is currently before we can start talking about how to change it.

I don't honestly know the reason, but I do have a theory. Until one of the techies drops by with a better explanation, consider this:

The problem is not storage space. In today's world binary storage space is ludicrously cheap, and as you've pointed out we have huge archival subfora full of nothing but old junk that nobody looks at.

The problem is checking permissions. For every limited-access subforum, the server has to check whether you have permission to enter every single time that it does something like look for your unread posts in order to populate your main forum index. This, I think, is a fairly time-consuming check for the server. (Time-consuming in computer terms. Probably a matter of microseconds, but all those microseconds add up.) We delete old usergroups not to save the trivial amount of space those messages take up, but to save the CPU cycles that it takes to constantly check who can look into those usergroups and who cannot.

It's a shame to lose stuff like the Siggattar Lounge and Experimental Gamers. I'd like to see this problem resolved, but myself I don't know enough to suggest a solution.

To an extent this is true. However from what I've been told, the issue lies with the cluttering of the admin interface when filled with many groups / group forums.


Now that you are red, can we get an update on possibly changing this policy?

This isn't exactly my call, but I'll see what the other admins think.
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5096
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1


Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users