Moderator: Community Team
Funkyterrance wrote:Coming soon...
CC's top players whose favourite color is blue!
If you started this as CC's top ranked 20 something players I could see the point but as it stands I find this highly irrelevant. In fact, since you make the assumption that skill at playing risk is synonymous with intelligence per se, you may have to go sit in the corner for this one.
Bones2484 wrote:NoSurvivors wrote:A bit more and I'll qualify.. Guess I should start trying again ^_^ fun list, keep it up!
Sorry, you're 42. Won't be able to make this list without quite a bit of effort.
Robinette wrote:ahhhh,,, the lazy days of summer...
i'm just gonna relax awhile after my latest double catch..
Alraun wrote:Dunno why you added me to that list, but I'm 38.
Robinette wrote:Alraun wrote:Dunno why you added me to that list, but I'm 38.
not from one of the names on my list...
tell me it isn't so... lol
Alraun wrote:Robinette wrote:Alraun wrote:Dunno why you added me to that list, but I'm 38.
not from one of the names on my list...
tell me it isn't so... lol
I see that it's about win percentage now and not age, but the language is all like someone is talking about age, so whatever. If he wanted to be clear, he'd have used the % sign a bunch. Anyone saying teens and twenty somethings and isn't talking about age needs to make that clear.
Dunno why under 30% matters. I'm at 29% and play exclusively 5-8 player games, mostly 8. Anyone better than me at games with the same number of players would be in the 30s.
fishydance wrote:Actually think this isn't really about % wins, but a clever ruse to get people to admit their ages... or imagined ages
TheSaxlad wrote:this thread is still going?!
Man wait till next october and then I qualify!
TheSaxlad wrote:this thread is still going?!
Man wait till next october and then I qualify!
CBlake wrote:What about teens
But if you are in the teens, I'm probably not interested unless you are REALLY exceptional...
it is very hard to fathom someone in their teens being good enough to be on this short list...
but if you really think that describes YOU, then please post...
Funkyterrance wrote:Now admittedly I have put very little effort into this observation but wouldn't being a high ranked 20%er just mean you played varied games for a while and then decided to, as of late, focus on very specific settings or just stared "trying" in order to jump in rank??? I guess the intrinsic value of 20%-30% eludes me.
Help a lazy person out, someone?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Now admittedly I have put very little effort into this observation but wouldn't being a high ranked 20%er just mean you played varied games for a while and then decided to, as of late, focus on very specific settings or just stared "trying" in order to jump in rank??? I guess the intrinsic value of 20%-30% eludes me.
Help a lazy person out, someone?
i don't think you understand why robinette starts threads about herself
Funkyterrance wrote:john9blue wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Now admittedly I have put very little effort into this observation but wouldn't being a high ranked 20%er just mean you played varied games for a while and then decided to, as of late, focus on very specific settings or just stared "trying" in order to jump in rank??? I guess the intrinsic value of 20%-30% eludes me.
Help a lazy person out, someone?
i don't think you understand why robinette starts threads about herself
Yeah I'm really tired atm. Send me a pm to spare any onlooking small children?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:
i don't think you understand why robinette starts threads about herself
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users