Moderator: Community Team
rdsrds2120 wrote:I now have 3 piercings and an illegitimate son. Whuh-oh!
saxitoxin wrote:rdsrds2120 wrote:I now have 3 piercings and an illegitimate son. Whuh-oh!
WHO YOUR BABY DADDY, RDS?
Phatscotty wrote:That's why, for me and politics, everything is on hold except for spending and debt issues. Whoever is going to address those concerns is going to get my support and my vote, and I don't care if it's a Democrat or a Republican.
Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:That's why, for me and politics, everything is on hold except for spending and debt issues. Whoever is going to address those concerns is going to get my support and my vote, and I don't care if it's a Democrat or a Republican.
You mean like Gary Johnson, the Libertarian that you refused to support or vote for?
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:That's why, for me and politics, everything is on hold except for spending and debt issues. Whoever is going to address those concerns is going to get my support and my vote, and I don't care if it's a Democrat or a Republican.
You mean like Gary Johnson, the Libertarian that you refused to support or vote for?
Who?
Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:That's why, for me and politics, everything is on hold except for spending and debt issues. Whoever is going to address those concerns is going to get my support and my vote, and I don't care if it's a Democrat or a Republican.
You mean like Gary Johnson, the Libertarian that you refused to support or vote for?
Who?
Exactly. You're no libertarian nor are you interested in actual debt resolution. You're only interested in getting your own way.
How on earth can you pose as a credible libertarian unaffiliated with any of the parties if you're not even aware of Gary Johnson?Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:That's why, for me and politics, everything is on hold except for spending and debt issues. Whoever is going to address those concerns is going to get my support and my vote, and I don't care if it's a Democrat or a Republican.
You mean like Gary Johnson, the Libertarian that you refused to support or vote for?
Who?
Exactly. You're no libertarian nor are you interested in actual debt resolution. You're only interested in getting your own way.
Would you care to explain exactly how me voting for Gary Johnson would resolve our 16.4 trillion dollar debt? Perhaps if you can explain that to me, I will admit I was wrong and that I should have voted for Gary Johnson.
Give it a shot, not like you have anything to lose
Iliad wrote:How on earth can you pose as a credible libertarian unaffiliated with any of the parties if you're not even aware of Gary Johnson?Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:That's why, for me and politics, everything is on hold except for spending and debt issues. Whoever is going to address those concerns is going to get my support and my vote, and I don't care if it's a Democrat or a Republican.
You mean like Gary Johnson, the Libertarian that you refused to support or vote for?
Who?
Exactly. You're no libertarian nor are you interested in actual debt resolution. You're only interested in getting your own way.
Would you care to explain exactly how me voting for Gary Johnson would resolve our 16.4 trillion dollar debt? Perhaps if you can explain that to me, I will admit I was wrong and that I should have voted for Gary Johnson.
Give it a shot, not like you have anything to lose
On today's early-morning fiscal cliff vote in the Senate: "Americans began ringing in the new year moments ago, many with the uncertainty of their financial stability as a result of the fiscal cliff negotiations we have heard so much about over the past weeks.
"While I appreciate my colleagues’ efforts to protect taxpayers – I don’t think the deal we reached tonight went far enough in achieving that. The combination of raising taxes and increasing spending is not in Americans’ best interest, and I could not, in good faith, support this piece of legislation.
"I will continue my fight for the American taxpayers and small businesses in the 113th Congress."
Night Strike wrote:
Timminz wrote:Night Strike wrote:
Why are you inventing numbers?
According to wikipedia, the bill includes $600B of increased tax revenue over 10 years (approximately half of the number you've made up).
Timminz wrote:Also, why are you so up in arms? Are you earning more than $400,000/year? Expecting an inheritance greater than $5,000,000? Making a significant amount on capital gains?
Is it just that standing up for those with the most, while shitting on those with the least, is the American conservative Christian way?
Why not fight for the rights of the weak? The ones who do not have the power or the resources to fight for themselves. WWJD?
Ray Rider wrote:Timminz wrote:Night Strike wrote:
Why are you inventing numbers?
According to wikipedia, the bill includes $600B of increased tax revenue over 10 years (approximately half of the number you've made up).
Divide 600 billion by 10 years and you get an increase of 60 billion per year year, which is approximately the same as NS's graph (62 billion)...
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee