greenoaks wrote:is this based on a childrens game ?
Gilligan wrote:looks like Parcheesi?
koontz1973 wrote:Yep, this is Parchisi, Ludo, Mensch ärgere dich nicht, Fia, so be it, Sorry, Aggravation, but what ever you call it, it is all the same and many variations have come of this.
koontz1973 wrote:Things to think about.
koontz1973 wrote:What happens if in a nuclear game, someone loses all of their nest? Can it be retaken?
koontz1973 wrote:How can the game continue if someone parks a stack of troops onto their own start point or any square, how do the others get round him?
koontz1973 wrote:Trench games, this is going to become extremely horrible to play. You have to wait 10 rounds before you can even attack the next player if you all start in the nests.
koontz1973 wrote:How will the players get put onto the board? If this is only going to be a four player game, you will need to ask permission form nobodies. Never looked at the other thread as it was not something I was interested in and really before my time.
koontz1973 wrote:Ask yourself this, would this map make a good addition to the site?
what? did you ask this also in Parchisi map for example?
koontz1973 wrote:what? did you ask this also in Parchisi map for example?
No, but it is something that is going to be asked now a lot more and not only by me.
koontz1973 wrote:Apart from that, all things seem to be good to go even though this seems like a very poor draft from you.
koontz1973 wrote:After CSFR and The Great War, I am surprised to see this as it is.
are you joking? you was the second one who was against The Great War.
and what is criterion for "good adition tot he site"?
so you can also ask in Poker Club, Chinese Checkers, Monsters, Patch Wars, Chrsitmas
koontz1973 wrote:The two drafts for those maps where great and compared to this one, that is why I was surprised.
koontz1973 wrote:I was never against the great war map.
koontz1973 wrote:I agree with nobodies that we already have a map like this, so do we really need another?
koontz1973 wrote:We can ask a lot of things of previous maps, but those have already been made. Just because it has been done before, it may not be allowed to be done again.
koontz1973 wrote:Oneyed, you are trying to twist everything I say to be against you, and that is not the case.
koontz1973 wrote:Go and re read what I said about TGW and you will not see anything in my post that is against it. Just advice on how it could get better.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests