qwert wrote:man so many hatred from greenoaks, im not going to forget these never., one day post,and he all ready demand to be rejected.
not at all.
i support the map ribbon idea because that concept is awesome, this is stupid.
Moderator: Community Team
qwert wrote:man so many hatred from greenoaks, im not going to forget these never., one day post,and he all ready demand to be rejected.
Metsfanmax wrote:I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.
Metsfanmax wrote:I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.
Metsfanmax wrote:I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.
qwert wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.
well for all medal could be abuse, but these we will not have any medals at all. Like i say in first post,these its open for discussion, unfortunately for some people there its not discussion at all. What its worse, after they say negative about these suggestion, they come over and over again in these post to put negative pressure to everyone who maybe think that these its good idea.
After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?
Jippd wrote:Would it be decided based on when the games end or the game numbers themselves?
qwert wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.
well for all medal could be abuse, but these we will not have any medals at all. Like i say in first post,these its open for discussion, unfortunately for some people there its not discussion at all. What its worse, after they say negative about these suggestion, they come over and over again in these post to put negative pressure to everyone who maybe think that these its good idea.
After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?
qwert wrote:Jippd wrote:Would it be decided based on when the games end or the game numbers themselves?
im not quite sure what you mean?
chapcrap wrote:qwert wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.
well for all medal could be abuse, but these we will not have any medals at all. Like i say in first post,these its open for discussion, unfortunately for some people there its not discussion at all. What its worse, after they say negative about these suggestion, they come over and over again in these post to put negative pressure to everyone who maybe think that these its good idea.
After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?
Why don't you respond to the abuse aspect?
Why do you think that this will not lead to abuse?qwert wrote:Jippd wrote:Would it be decided based on when the games end or the game numbers themselves?
im not quite sure what you mean?
He is asking whether the consecutive victories go by the time the games finish or do they go by the game number.
Gilligan wrote:Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?
No thanks.
qwert wrote:After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?
qwert wrote:Gilligan wrote:Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?
No thanks.
these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.
Gilligan wrote:qwert wrote:Gilligan wrote:Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?
No thanks.
these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.
Even then.
With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.
Gilligan wrote:qwert wrote:Gilligan wrote:Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?
No thanks.
these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.
Even then.
With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.
Gilligan wrote:qwert wrote:Gilligan wrote:Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?
No thanks.
these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.
Even then.
With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.
qwert wrote:Gilligan wrote:qwert wrote:Gilligan wrote:Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?
No thanks.
these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.
Even then.
With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.
so then? we need to create medal who are easy to achive, but recently i find that some members want to present any new idea,to be systematicaly farming, like that these not hepend in all present medals, but only in mine suggestion are clear case abouth farming?
agentcom wrote:The person with the most games on this site Mageplunka69 has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.
agentcom wrote:The person with the most games on this site Mageplunka69 has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.
Jippd wrote:agentcom wrote:The person with the most games on this site Mageplunka69 has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.
There has to be someone out there that has higher than 26 in a row for the map specialists. I know I've gotten around 20ish myself on Das 1 v 1. Some players that come to mind are ccat or kaskavel on hive?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users