Moderator: Community Team
Depends on drop and position.CBlake wrote:Let's hear it. Are you usually the assist man(Troop sharer) who sits back and lets his teammates do the action? Or are you the aggressor(Usually initiates the attacks) I usually find myself falling back and sharing my troops in most team games and try to have a more patient approach, especially when breaking bonuses and such.
betiko wrote:yup. would be stupid to assign this type of roles to given players in a team, this should be 100% decided depending on the drop.
I play for what is best for the team unless some idiot joins as my p and after he rolls down his troops and does not fort in the proper manner. disreguards team chat, I will foe, not fort him and possibly verbally abuse him.Funkyterrance wrote:I believe Cblake is referring to tendencies, like are you a team player or are you out for glory? While I of course enjoy being the one delivering the final crushing blows I would rather make more secure the win than risk losing position for the sake of making the "winning move". Seems the obvious choice but this is in no way the attitude held by all players.
Another thing to consider is the skill level of the players involved. If Player X has never played on that map before while player Y has that particular map mastered, does the team necessarily decide to make player X as opposed to Y the attacker, even if there is a slight advantage in doing so? I think these types of considerations come into play as well.
betiko wrote:anybody has problems sacrifying yourself if it's for the good of the team??
GeneralRisk wrote:I play for what is best for the team unless some idiot joins as my p and after he rolls down his troops and does not fort in the proper manner. disreguards team chat, I will foe, not fort him and possibly verbally abuse him.
Funkyterrance wrote:I believe Cblake is referring to tendencies, like are you a team player or are you out for glory? While I of course enjoy being the one delivering the final crushing blows I would rather make more secure the win than risk losing position for the sake of making the "winning move". Seems the obvious choice but this is in no way the attitude held by all players.
Another thing to consider is the skill level of the players involved. If Player X has never played on that map before while player Y has that particular map mastered, does the team necessarily decide to make player X as opposed to Y the attacker, even if there is a slight advantage in doing so? I think these types of considerations come into play as well.
Funkyterrance wrote:I wonder if most risk players like to lead, being a world domination game and all...
Funkyterrance wrote:I believe Cblake is referring to tendencies, like are you a team player or are you out for glory? While I of course enjoy being the one delivering the final crushing blows I would rather make more secure the win than risk losing position for the sake of making the "winning move". Seems the obvious choice but this is in no way the attitude held by all players.
Another thing to consider is the skill level of the players involved. If Player X has never played on that map before while player Y has that particular map mastered, does the team necessarily decide to make player X as opposed to Y the attacker, even if there is a slight advantage in doing so? I think these types of considerations come into play as well.
benga wrote:Boring!!!
swimmerdude99 wrote:
But let it also be known that FunkyTerrance is a terrible player. He is greedy, must always lead crushing blows. He's just there for the glory, While I win the games
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users