NAFT Games

[Eddygp]

Well, I am tending to prefer NAFT games (Nuclear, Adjacent, Fog and Trench) over other settings, but as far as I've read in the forum, most people dislike or even hate each of these settings separately, so the vast majority will not like all of these options together either. I like these settings because they are realistic; in a real war there is a lack of communication between the belligerents, you cannot actually reinforce many troops to a very faraway place even if the path they take belongs to you, and you can't keep attacking from a territory to another and another (well, in WWII, in the Pacific Front, General Douglas McArthur did design a new tactic in Micronesia which allowed them to move faster in this area... let's pretend we didn't know ). Nuclear spoils are fairly unrealistic, but I liked the setting as well. Flat Rate Spoils would probably be the most realistic there.
I've just thought about creating this topic and poll to check if most people dislike these settings or if it is just a prejudice I made.

[BigBallinStalin]

I'm a fan of North American Free Trade.

[Eddygp]

Uh lol. Actually, it would be NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement). But what do you think about the settings for a game though?

[BigBallinStalin]

To hell with the Agreement!

Having signed the non-proliferation treaty, I must refrained from acquiring nuclear spoils.

[Eddygp]

Oh... anyway, play Three Kingdoms of Korea.