[CL5] 1:KORT MVP:josko 2:ID MVP:M Chief 3:AQOH MVP:thelord

[sempaispellcheck]

I will be leaving SoH and playing for LHDD in the League Round of CL5.
dt03457 will be SoH 1st contact for the League Round.
I will, of course, fulfill all remaining obligations with respect to QG3.

sempai

[jackin_u_up]

MeanestBossEver will be taking over all duties for AFOS in the next phase of CL5

[Qwert]

left active games
QG1-32
QG2-15
QG3-30
QG4-31
QG5-30
QG6-33
----------
total -171 ( 13%)

if everything be decided for next 7 days- start of second phase could be on 19 may, or 26 may.

[IcePack]

left active games
QG1-32
QG2-15
QG3-30
QG4-31
QG5-30
QG6-33
----------
total -171 ( 13%)

if everything be decided for next 7 days- start of second phase could be on 19 may, or 26 may.

Everything decided in 7 days and start may 19 or 26?
If things finish in 7 from your post, that's may 7+7= 14th. To start 19th is unreasonable, there needs to be some time allowance for planning games, research etc.

[jetsetwilly]

These were the original dates for phase 2.

1. May 19th
2.June 2nd
3.June 16th
4.June 30th
5. July 14th
6.July 28th
7.Aug 11th
8. Aug 25th
9. Sep 8th
10. Sep 22nd
11. Oct 6th

It's a CD decision but I would suggest it slips 2 weeks to June 2nd. That still sees it finish much earlier than last year.

These dates were chosen to alternate with the random league so I don't think it's wise to go just 1 week or it will clash throughout.

[chemefreak]

I'm sorry. Do we know all the sections yet?

[Qwert]

I'm sorry. Do we know all the sections yet?

not yet, next table update will be 12 may.

[chapcrap]

I see no problem with this. I do agree to keep it alternating with Random League.

These were the original dates for phase 2.

1. May 19th
2.June 2nd
3.June 16th
4.June 30th
5. July 14th
6.July 28th
7.Aug 11th
8. Aug 25th
9. Sep 8th
10. Sep 22nd
11. Oct 6th

It's a CD decision but I would suggest it slips 2 weeks to June 2nd. That still sees it finish much earlier than last year.

These dates were chosen to alternate with the random league so I don't think it's wise to go just 1 week or it will clash throughout.

[Qwert]

next table and score update will be on 12 may.(expect some crazy results)

Its look that in some Groups, game diference will be decide who will go to Premier League.

[Fewnix]

I'm sorry. Do we know all the sections yet?

not yet, next table update will be 12 may.

The 12th of May has come.

As a member of Spelunkers of Hell (SoH) I am particularlyy interested in how SoH is doing?

ARE WE GONNA WIN??
second place= Premier League- playing the best of the best?

Re: [CL5] Phase 1 - Qualifying Group 3

Postby qwert on Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:11 am
update table and results
soh make big jump, and its going to be big battle for second place

.

Re: [CL5] Phase 1 - Qualifying Group 3

Postby qwert on Fri May 03, 2013 8:15 am
id-soh, match who could resolve who will be in second place.
Foed have limited chances for second place, but its more depend on how will solve matches against UM8 and AFOS.

Afos are very close to finish hes job before end of all round.

Re: [CL5] Phase 1 - Qualifying Group 3

Postby qwert on Sun May 05, 2013 12:48 pm
update table and results.

AFos make big advantage,and in last 3 match need only 2 points so that teoreticaly secure PRemier League.
SOH-ID- and Foed continue battle for second place.
Dyn could ruin chances for ID, because its 4-1 for DYn, and these potential defeat could push SOH to the second place

Re: [CL5] Phase 1 - Qualifying Group 3

Postby danryan on Fri May 10, 2013 10:51 am
Wow, this is so close I can't figure out who is leading for second right now. Congratulations to the fisters.

User avatar
Captain danryan

[Qwert]

well we get more qualifiers from all groups

Premier LEague qualify
qg1-Tofu
qg1-Pig
qg2-myth
qg2-?
qg3-afos
qg3-?
qg4-low
qg4-fall
qg5-ia
qg5-?
qg6-kort
qg6-tnc

second League qualify
qg1-gr
qg1-leg
qg2-mb
qg2-?
qg3-?
qg3-?
qg4-ra
qg4-aok
qg5-?
qg5-?
qg6-lhdd
qg6-osa

third League qualify
qg1-dbc
qg1-cf
qg2-lotz
qg3-um8
qg3-?
qg4-vdll
qg5-?
qg5-aqoh
qg6-db
qg6-hh
-------------------------------------------------
left active games
QG1-15
QG2-7
QG3-19
QG4-16
QG5-17
QG6-20
----------
total - 94 ( 7%)

[Qwert]

left active games
QG1-6
QG2-1
QG3-8
QG4-6
QG5-6
QG6-3
----------
total - 30

[Doc_Brown]

Maps
NO Beta.
Clan's can use one map only once in Qualification Round and once in League Round.
Random maps can be used as many times as so desired and what ever map it turns out to be will not be counted towards the 1 map rule.

Is this still the case? There are twice as many teams in the league rounds as in the qualification rounds. It would seem like 2 uses per map (against different opponents) would make more sense.

[Crazyirishman]

Maps
NO Beta.
Clan's can use one map only once in Qualification Round and once in League Round.
Random maps can be used as many times as so desired and what ever map it turns out to be will not be counted towards the 1 map rule.

Is this still the case? There are twice as many teams in the league rounds as in the qualification rounds. It would seem like 2 uses per map (against different opponents) would make more sense.

Right now it looks like we'll have to figure out what our 88th best/favorite map is.

[jetsetwilly]

Maps
NO Beta.
Clan's can use one map only once in Qualification Round and once in League Round.
Random maps can be used as many times as so desired and what ever map it turns out to be will not be counted towards the 1 map rule.

Is this still the case? There are twice as many teams in the league rounds as in the qualification rounds. It would seem like 2 uses per map (against different opponents) would make more sense.

Yup, this was stated up front and it was always going to make phase 2 more interesting !

[Qwert]

Maps
NO Beta.
Clan's can use one map only once in Qualification Round and once in League Round.
Random maps can be used as many times as so desired and what ever map it turns out to be will not be counted towards the 1 map rule.

Is this still the case? There are twice as many teams in the league rounds as in the qualification rounds. It would seem like 2 uses per map (against different opponents) would make more sense.

make more sense? Consider that we have 235 maps, i dont see how 88 different maps for League phase dont have sense?
We discussed all this,way before start of CL5, and we came to conclusion, that for any clan who play in CL5, knowledge of 88 different maps are not are any obstacle, and that everybody can handle with this.
Every clan have enough time to prepare 88 diferent maps out of 235(except random who can use withouth restrictions)

left active games
QG1-5
QG2-1
QG3-3
QG4-4
QG5-6
QG6-3
----------
total - 22

[Doc_Brown]

make more sense? Consider that we have 235 maps, i dont see how 88 different maps for League phase dont have sense?
We discussed all this,way before start of CL5, and we came to conclusion, that for any clan who play in CL5, knowledge of 88 different maps are not are any obstacle, and that everybody can handle with this.
Every clan have enough time to prepare 88 diferent maps out of 235(except random who can use withouth restrictions)

No worries. I wasn't involved with any clans with CL5 was being discussed, so I just wanted to check on the situation. Thanks.

[Chariot of Fire]

Can you please clarify one of the rules re player quota.....

Players
In one Qualification/League Week,one player can play maximum 6 game. One week consist of two round,this mean that every player can play 3 in one and 3 in other round.

The rule here says a player may play a maximum of 6 games per league week. Then it says a player may play 3 in one and 3 in another. Is this just an example? Can a player play 4 in one and 2 in another (i.e. he/she does not exceed 6)?

[IcePack]

Can you please clarify one of the rules re player quota.....

Players
In one Qualification/League Week,one player can play maximum 6 game. One week consist of two round,this mean that every player can play 3 in one and 3 in other round.

The rule here says a player may play a maximum of 6 games per league week. Then it says a player may play 3 in one and 3 in another. Is this just an example? Can a player play 4 in one and 2 in another (i.e. he/she does not exceed 6)?

this was clarified previously, max 3 and 3 i believe.

[Chariot of Fire]

Ah right, OK thanks. If that is the case then the rule should be rewritten to make this clearer. "A player may play a maximum of three games against the same opposition in any one League Week"

[IcePack]

Ah right, OK thanks. If that is the case then the rule should be rewritten to make this clearer. "A player may play a maximum of three games against the same opposition in any one League Week"

yeah, im pretty sure we had this debate already. and the answer was "mine rule is write clear"

[Chariot of Fire]

[IcePack]

Close...
viewtopic.php?f=441&t=185753&start=45#p4070299

max # of games per player:

6 in one week. is it max 3 per round, or it can be 4-2 or 5-1 etc?

tx

It's a max of 3 in each.

in one week player can play maximum 6 games, and consider that one week have 2 round, these its split even (3+3) , its good explained in rules

shortly after...

in one week player can play maximum 6 games, and consider that one week have 2 round, these its split even (3+3) , its good explained in rules

No, that's not a good explanation. It's best to say 3 games per round is the maximum. Saying 6 per week makes it sound like they can be split up.

[Chariot of Fire]

Thanks. Rule needs rewriting as it's open to different interpretation.

[Crazyirishman]

Ah right, OK thanks. If that is the case then the rule should be rewritten to make this clearer. "A player may play a maximum of three games against the same opposition in any one League Week"

yeah, im pretty sure we had this debate already. and the answer was "mine rule is write clear"

f*ck you, I can't stop laughing.