IcePack wrote:Lets revamp the site to not look 1996, then we can look at the maps.
rdsrds2120 wrote:I voted yes. From an administrative standpoint, holding work for the sake of work is backwards thinking. If we can assert ourselves to aim to provide our users with a more top-notch experience in every aspect of the site (yes, yes, things haven't been perfect, I know), then I believe that we certainly should! The perfect solution would be ender's skins idea, but that is something that would take quite a bit of time to setup and complete.
thenobodies80 wrote:Now, it seems to me that 78% could be considered a sort of "yes, go with it"...no?
Gilligan wrote:That turtle is my new best friend.
macbone wrote:ManB, the first map you posted in this thread is beautiful. Man. I'd love to play on a luscious map like that.
Ace Rimmer wrote:Honestly, can anyone really compare this:
and not think that the first looks better? Not perfect, but compare them and look. Don't be complacent, demand that maps are as beautiful as Tisha (and her maps).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users