Moderator: Community Team
wcaclimbing wrote:lackattack wrote:wcaclimbing wrote:would we have to check it each attack, or would it remember which one you used last time?
check it each attack. the default should be normal because your next attack might be something completely different.
to me, that doesnt sound like a great idea.
I think it should keep both the attack button and the autoattack button, with the auto-attack button defaulted at attack until 3 are left like normal, but with check boxes under just the auto-attack button.
Having to check the boxes for EVERY attack would take a lot of time, and would also just be another "I CLICKED ATTACK WITH ALL INSTEAD OF ATTACK ONCE!!! YOU NEED TO FIX THE BUTTONS!!!".
If you are going to do this, at least leave the two buttons the way they are, just add the check boxes under the Auto-attack button.
lackattack wrote:I said attackers instead of armies to differentiate between defending armies.
How about this...
Auto: [] 5 rolls [] 10 rolls [] to the death!
EDIT: Now I'm having second thoughts about this whole thing. It will mean an extra click to do an auto-attack which would annoy me because I use it very often!
yeti_c wrote:Why don't you have
[Auto] [] 5 rolls [] 10 rolls
If you don't check anything it's standard "to the death!" attacks...
If you check something then it uses that?
C.
yeti_c wrote:lackattack wrote:
How about this...
Why don't you have
[Auto] [] 5 rolls [] 10 rolls
If you don't check anything it's standard "to the death!" attacks...
If you check something then it uses that?
C.
cicero wrote:I believe that a good interface...
...italicised text on the page.
Cicero
Visaoni wrote:Herakilla wrote:already suggested, please do searches b4 suggesting
Then why hasn't it been done.
It would be a great addition.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users