Conquer Club

Random Turn Order (Variable)

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Random Turn Order (Variable)

Postby Exterminator on Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:46 pm

Random Play Order

Simple, its a mixture between Sequential and Freestyle.

when u play a game, each player takes there turn 1 at a time BUT it dus not run down the order. basically, ur turn is randomly selected(sumhow)
but ur turn can not be next if u were the last to go in that round.

if ur confused, heres an example:

Game Has been initialized
Blue Player takes his/her go
Red Player Takes his/her go
Green Player takes his/her go
Round 2
Red Player Takes his/her go
etc.

I feel we need more game options, specially the PLAY ORDER bit

Priority (1-5): 2

thoughts ???

P.S. if this has been suggested before, im sorry

MOD EDIT:
SEE ALSO
: The related suggestion in which the turn order remains the same each round; Random Turn Order (Fixed)
Last edited by spiesr on Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Link to similar suggestion.
"Sex is like maths. You add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs, leave your solution and pray you don’t multiply."

Click this to be part of something HUGE!
User avatar
Private 1st Class Exterminator
 
Posts: 481
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:52 pm

Postby Exterminator on Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:46 pm

Bump
"Sex is like maths. You add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs, leave your solution and pray you don’t multiply."

Click this to be part of something HUGE!
User avatar
Private 1st Class Exterminator
 
Posts: 481
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:52 pm

Postby AK_iceman on Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:47 pm

Check the to-do list, I think this has been rejected before.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class AK_iceman
 
Posts: 5704
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Postby AAFitz on Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:53 pm

i have to say im glad it was rejected...if play order changed every round the luck involved would really determine the game...it would become so random between cards, dice and play order, that almost all skill would be eliminated from the game...if you get bad dice, no set, and went last in the rounds..you would just never have a shot

not to mention it would just give people more to complain about....every other thread would be...why do i always go last...etc...
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Postby CreepyUncleAndy on Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:50 pm

How about this?

At the beginning of each round, the "already went" roster is emptied.

At the end of your turn, your name is added to the "already went" roster.

At the end of your turn, each player that has not "already went" is represented by a button; pushing this button does two things:


(a) it ends your turn, &

(b) the player whose button was pushed becomes the next player to go.


Once every player's name is on the "already went" roster, the next round begins.
User avatar
Private CreepyUncleAndy
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:45 pm

Postby kclborat on Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:01 am

That could be taken advantage of very well, though its an interesting idea
Most points: 1606
User avatar
Private 1st Class kclborat
 
Posts: 367
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:40 pm
Location: Washington

Postby Exterminator on Sun Mar 11, 2007 5:49 am

AK_iceman wrote:Check the to-do list, I think this has been rejected before.


just looked and i coodnt find it anywhere, if u can find it, show me

AAFitz wrote:i have to say im glad it was rejected...if play order changed every round the luck involved would really determine the game...it would become so random between cards, dice and play order, that almost all skill would be eliminated from the game...if you get bad dice, no set, and went last in the rounds..you would just never have a shot

not to mention it would just give people more to complain about....every other thread would be...why do i always go last...etc...


every1 complains about the dice but it hasnt made lack change it

CreepyUncleAndy wrote:How about this?

At the beginning of each round, the "already went" roster is emptied.

At the end of your turn, your name is added to the "already went" roster.

At the end of your turn, each player that has not "already went" is represented by a button; pushing this button does two things:

(a) it ends your turn, &

(b) the player whose button was pushed becomes the next player to go.

Once every player's name is on the "already went" roster, the next round begins


could be used for secret alliances/by multis
"Sex is like maths. You add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs, leave your solution and pray you don’t multiply."

Click this to be part of something HUGE!
User avatar
Private 1st Class Exterminator
 
Posts: 481
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:52 pm

Random Turn Order

Postby Finny on Sat Jun 16, 2007 9:04 pm

Random turn order

<Body>:

Suggestion Idea: Turn order randomized.

Specifics: "a mix between sequential and freestyle
the turn order is changed up every round"

Why it is needed: Could be a fun alternative

Priority** (1-5): 2
Last edited by Finny on Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
Lieutenant Finny
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:54 am

Postby pancakemix on Sat Jun 16, 2007 9:16 pm

I don't like it. It's possible to get 2 turns in a row that way.
Epic Win

"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class pancakemix
 
Posts: 7973
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: The Grim Guzzler

Postby hecter on Sat Jun 16, 2007 9:22 pm

I like it. It would make for a wacky and interesting game. Try filling out the form so we can get some mod acknowledgment.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class hecter
 
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor

Postby dominationnation on Sat Jun 16, 2007 9:24 pm

Isnt that sort like no overlapping freestlye turns
Cook dominationnation
 
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:20 am

Postby kwanton on Sat Jun 16, 2007 11:07 pm

...

I like the idea Finny. If I got anything wrong in the form feel free to change. Only way this would work though is if a code was implemented to prevent double turns. Otherwise kudos.
Last edited by kwanton on Sun Jun 17, 2007 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby Finny on Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:10 am

thanx kwanton that looks pretty good
Lieutenant Finny
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:54 am

Postby Finny on Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:13 am

i guess it would be like no overlapping freestyle except in that you get to choose when you play but in this the order would already be picked
Lieutenant Finny
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:54 am

Postby Aries on Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:21 am

Nice idea I'd play it for sure 8)
User avatar
Lieutenant Aries
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Outside your door waiting for you to die :D

Postby dominationnation on Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:44 am

Finny wrote:i guess it would be like no overlapping freestyle except in that you get to choose when you play but in this the order would already be picked
oh. ok I see that now.

ps. could you copy and paste what kwanton did and edit it onto your first post.
Cook dominationnation
 
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:20 am

Postby kwanton on Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:28 pm

What happened to this idea? I liked it.
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby 116Soldier on Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:14 pm

I like this idea but it shouldn't be made for every game. It should be an option that you choose and double turns are allowed. That would be fun because it would be all luck!
User avatar
Cook 116Soldier
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:15 pm

Postby nmhunate on Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:22 pm

Double turns should not be allowed... Imagine a three player game where by luck of the drawl the same guy gets two doubles turns in a game.

But good idea nevertheless.
Sergeant 1st Class nmhunate
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:35 pm

Postby Finny on Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:21 pm

i agree with nmhunate i think it would be too much based on luck if there were double turns
Lieutenant Finny
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:54 am

Postby Coleman on Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:27 pm

Let's say six people are playing together under these rules. Red, Blue, Yellow, Pink, Green & Cyan.

Blue during the first round moves before red. Red decides to attack Blue when it is her turn.

Next round Red gets to move before Blue. Because turn order is randomized blue never had a chance to push back the first attack and is now extremely damaged. Cyan, not one to miss a great opportunity, sees that Blue is very killable and finishes him off before his turn comes up.

Random turns are unfair regardless of back to back turns, all you have to do is get 2 turns in a row before your current target and the power shift is just too much.

Oh, Green won. Green wins a lot.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby DiM on Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:31 pm

Coleman wrote:Let's say six people are playing together under these rules. Red, Blue, Yellow, Pink, Green & Cyan.

Blue during the first round moves before red. Red decides to attack Blue when it is her turn.

Next round Red gets to move before Blue. Because turn order is randomized blue never had a chance to push back the first attack and is now extremely damaged. Cyan, not one to miss a great opportunity, sees that Blue is very killable and finishes him off before his turn comes up.

Random turns are unfair regardless of back to back turns, all you have to do is get 2 turns in a row before your current target and the power shift is just too much.

Oh, Green won. Green wins a lot.


i agree it may cause some really weird games but that's the whole point. more fun. i definitely agree with this idea. it's just an extra option :lol:
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Postby Finny on Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:37 pm

Coleman wrote:Let's say six people are playing together under these rules. Red, Blue, Yellow, Pink, Green & Cyan.

Blue during the first round moves before red. Red decides to attack Blue when it is her turn.

Next round Red gets to move before Blue. Because turn order is randomized blue never had a chance to push back the first attack and is now extremely damaged. Cyan, not one to miss a great opportunity, sees that Blue is very killable and finishes him off before his turn comes up.

Random turns are unfair regardless of back to back turns, all you have to do is get 2 turns in a row before your current target and the power shift is just too much.

Oh, Green won. Green wins a lot.


i see what coleman is saying but the same situation could occur in a freestyle game and it wouldnt be that different
Lieutenant Finny
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:54 am

Random Order

Postby ParadiceCity9 on Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:24 pm

I know this will probably be a really bad idea...but you never know.
I got the idea that there should be a gametype where the order is not sequential, not freestyle, but RANDOM. The only thing is that everyone can only play one turn during the round.
Corporal 1st Class ParadiceCity9
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:10 pm

Postby Pious on Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:03 pm

Isn't that just like a non-RT freestyle?
Image
Lieutenant Pious
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:01 pm

Next

Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users