Lindax wrote:Again no tournament posted for this week....

Lx

maybe the year is over? There is no schedule past April and it's already May...

In please, thanks.

This is a great idea. 3 round warning should be enough, as that would get you time to consider your last cards. It might also be nice for it to say "Game 10861134 Round 20 (Last Round)" of Final Round

Player: ThrushAAX
Map: Stalingrad
Settings: Sequential, Auto, Escalating, Chained, Fog

Isn't this what the callouts forum is for? Create a bunch of password protected games with the common ranks password and post in the ranks thread.

Personally I would like an option like this too. But the forum has worked well enough for me.

I think the 100 round limit should be default for all games. Especially tournament and special event games.

When do you ever plan on having more than 100 rounds in a game? It's just silly, pointless, and frustrating.

This makes quite a bit of sense. Maybe adding another attribute to the player tag in the gamelist response for the number of cards would work and be simple.

Ok, You've convinced me to use the CC API. :) It will sometimes take upwards of half a second for it to get data back but oh well...

For the new subject I like the format "Our <mapname> <quads, triples, doubles> for <tournament name>". So for me this would be "Our Flanders 1302 doubles for Davis ...

Given the game number, you can use the Conquer Club API to get information about a game, including the name of the map, and the tournament title, if any. No need for unsafeWindow accesses. There is a stickied topic about the API in the Tools Development forum.

Yeah, I really didn't want to hit ...

In please, thanks.

Round limit is useful so that games have a definitive end, even though they are not expected to be met.

That's a great idea. It would be pretty easy to get the map name with FF... unsafeWindow.map.title

Chrome is a bit of a problem, going to have to dig deeper and maybe hack something together.

I considered grabbing the name from the image url but the names sometimes include what appears to be a ...

I am getting a photobucket logo indicating that the Random loss icon is not available. Anybody else see this?

Yes, there are a couple of spots in the code where chipv was loading resources from external sites. Those URLs have been removed or changed or whatever. Probably need someone to figure ...

In please, thanks.

Assuming you add a round limit, otherwise absolutely not in.

JBlombier wrote:Thanks, guys. That was a very clear explanation. I used to have BOB, but my Firefox screwed me several times, so I deleted it. Stalingrad is the only I on't fully comprehend, so I figured it wouldn't make much of a difference.

BOB works for Google Chrome too.

this does not work for me. the button is there, and the "push button" animation works when i click it, but it does nothing else.

FF 8.0 Windows 7

Any reason why you haven't upgraded to FF10?

In any case, I have changed the first post to state that only the latest versions of browsers are ...

Map rank does this

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 7&t=100479

This would actually be a pretty simple script to write. The problem is you would need 28 web requests for an 8 player game.

Request per player chart here

It is most certainly possible, but the admins have to do it. They have apparently done in recently too....

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4#p3571834

I think they would probably decline any request though.

Thanks everyone, pretty cool to win. I considered going for the maintainer thing but I don't actually use the script.

RE Chrome support; Map Rank never supported chrome, it might be pretty easy add to support but I haven't taken a deep look. At the basics it needs the chrome boilerplate ...

yeah, having similar problem with old logs, not on all foggy maps but some. Also FF 10.0.2

Downgraded to: https://github.com/sherkaner/addons-for ... ob.user.js

In please, thanks.

In please, thanks.

In please, thanks.

Sounds like the saved searches script would do what you need... http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 27&t=18815

swimmerdude99 wrote:Mine doesn't work on Chrome is that changed in this version?

Yes, version 0.4 should work in Chrome. You can check that it is enabled and installed by going to chrome://settings/extensions