I will keep suggesting my awesome ideas.

Ok, so Im quite sure the feature if this be a territory bonus, a fort, etc.

What the essential effect I want, is a singular territory to gain all the troops of all adjacent territories.

So lets picture territory X, territory X has adjacent territories ...

thnks for the back up cc community...

you take a territory that is 4 neutral, it automatically gives you 3 troops, .... why are people not jumping on this.

its also a card function. instead of sets ... you could just have 1 card at a time, whose territory you are hunting, once you take it 3 ...

This is in addition to auto deploy.

I don't believe it is currently used, so I need to also ask if its possible.

Auto deploy means at the start of each turn you get x number of troops.

I propose immediate deploy, I take territory N, and receive x number of troops on the spot.

I wouldn't mind ...

Could I join as well? Sign me up and lets get the games rolling.

I can not do graphics or coding, but I do want to try a hand at map making as well.

Just might need some help.

Not aware of that. That means I'll have no competitors. I got the only new map to choose from? They'll have to take it!

haha dunno

if you just mean those are the coding and graphics people... i think not right?


you just mean the people in charge of mapmaking are not as active now? well can't ...

hmm, i actually have no graphic or coding abilities. Hopefully I can inspire others who due to assist me, if what I want is possible to do.

I am working on some maps but as I am entirely new to it, be good to have more map makers I agree to test out ideas. But, to make maps, I need to know if these things are possible.

I would like to create a territory where a team can take a territory or group of territories, which gives a - (negative) number of troops to your opponent.

Imagine a game where you have a starting point castle, like King's Court 2, or feudal Epic. And part of a siege mechanism, is to starve you ...

Oh dear, that is unfortunate. Well I'm going to truck ahead anyways. Which brings me to my next idea:

But I'll make post for it separately.

lol oh I get it, yes that was the women person I was thinking of. It was the only palin reference I could think of.

I'm fine with that naming of border lol.

I don't know what "palin" references, is that the women person? or is that a thing?

If a new tag can be made to specify border that is sweet.

On off note, while it isn't a secret or anything, I've decided to go ahead with some map making. quite early stages of. So, there are some things I'd like ...

This is a question, before suggestion. But I had to post it somewhere.. so here it is.

I was told about the territory alcatraz on the one map, where it can be attacked but does not attack itself.

My question/suggestion, is it possible for this territory that can be attacked/not attack itself to ...

Yes, I being scared is the most reasonable conclusion.

Did you invite me to a speed game perhaps? On classic map?

I am not obligated to play every single map and setting simply because I am challenged to do so... am I?

Give a shit about what?

In hindsight, I have no interest in checking this ...

ok

No.

That was lesson #2.

First lesson was vague new topic.

Lesson 2 is direct call out.

I suggest a system to remember favourite game settings. Say option 1-5 for example, although really many more is ideal.

When I go to start a game, there should be a number of options to "program" a favourite game settings.

#1 Map USA 2.1 settings: Adjacent Fog Polymorphic 4 Trench

#2 Eurasia ...

Please keep this post about random21.

I'm not discussing cc in this thread.

Thanks.

Krapht where are all your silly allegations?

Like how anyone who does well on this site is a cheat... you have an audience to entertain with your dimwitted views.

(me)

Are you asking me if the dice are random?

EH!

I am in Ontario. 1 hr south of Toronto.

I did make conqueror... was conqueror last year for a few months :)

Silly kaskavel likes being at the top though. :D What a meany.

Unfortunately I think if one did, could never choose to go back? Thankfully I never went the eunuch route. It's a ...

This is a cc thread to discuss the player random21.


Created by random21.


You can discuss good things or bad. I do not care. Think I'm a focussed player? Suspect me to be a multi (obviously because I'm to awesome for understanding otherwise...) ;) Like my sheer playfulness?

Want some general ...

oh, and by the way. I actually don't care about you putting me in the thread...

As for more of a response of your post, I have slowed down. I never played more than 20-30 games at a time. And they've been ranged. Originally it was eurasia unlimited sunny 1 v 1etc etc, which can easily get anyone to ...

I played Killface once, but I assure you I am not killface :)

I'm surprised you picked him. Looking at your analysis. If you go off of games played, Killface and I had completely different game types. I mean like... c o m p l e t e l y different.

I guess the only way you could think of it as ...

Whew looks like Krapht has let me off the hook, agreeing with Shannon on everything.

Krapht, I liked your phrase:

go all random21...

but can you give a more relevant reference for that phrase to be used with some kind of meaning?

Maybe like:

I was a Brigadier, but then I decided to go all ...

Wait, what?

I don't even get my own "multi" thread?

You just lazily throw me in at the end?

Not even with reasoning? Like my awesome 76% win rate (although only 75% is legit, I think the 76th percent is because of playing bots - but even they kill me from time to time). Or my ridiculously high ...

or being able to play an unrated game. too. most sites have that option