Again I suspect you miss the forest for the trees. The forest is the gameplay and strategy and many alternatives for a map, and the trees are what it looks like. This isnt WOW where we even need incredible graphics. This is a game of strategy, and id just assume play on a black and white map ...

nah that sucks RJ, these no room for the legend on instructions. FAIL.

hairy potter wrote:i think we should have a map where players fight over different stages of the reproductive cycle

definitely need a sperm donation room.

I mean, seriously...7 maps gets a 77 rating while our tremendous number of maps gets an 81?

Are you aware that the top map makers on ConquerClub, who have produced most of CC's awesome maps, have all gone to MajorCommand. I think you are over-valuing quantity over quality.

What part of "7 high ...

I mean, seriously...7 maps gets a 77 rating while our tremendous number of maps gets an 81?

Are you aware that the top map makers on ConquerClub, who have produced most of CC's awesome maps, have all gone to MajorCommand. I think you are over-valuing quantity over quality. Seriously,

This is ...

lackattack wrote:Alright, this is officially rejected

be careful with polling lack. change is almost universally unwelcome unless you are addressing a serious pain point.

This change makes sense. Make it so!

Formalized diplomacy would never work.

these are tomes. pretty intense what yall put together here.

CC needs more designers and less artists.

I've heard that CC doesn't actually get its numbers from Random.org. It's just a long list that is re-used.

Well since the cat is out of the bag I will confess to using "sleeper bonuses" on two of my maps. There were bonuses consisting of random territories that when held provide a +3 bonus. You could only see which territories were involved if you debugged the xml file which you had to do each turn ...

can anyone besides lackattack confirm this random.org business? For all we know its just some simple random number generator.

I have just been informed of a member who shall remain nameless has created a ip packet sniffer script which detects one way IO packets from random.org to conquerclub.com and is able to piece together that dice batch string with decent accuracy. This member is able to correlate attacks with ...

I like famin, i always thought nuclear was a bit harsh.

The space shuttles look like toiletries.

Your tweak is not a tweak. It will just alter the way people play now but it will not fix the point system.

Somewhere I've seen interesting idea:
if you play someone ... 2000 points lower than you are (ok, we can make it even 3000 or 1000, doesn't matter) you don't win points when you win the game ...

wow, 7 million games... thats quite an achievement.

Joodoo wrote:Draknor Level 1
The Hive
Conquer Man

you won't find many opponents there I am afraid, cept WM.

I came, I saw, I err'd. Made some mistakes and should have known there was no room for such things when 'binette's in the room.

which would you pick to play for eternity?

Mine are,

World 2.1
Battle for Iraq
and Australia.

JoshyBoy wrote:I disagree with you mibi. I think that CC will still be here in five years time, and will be better than ever before.

I don't think so. My prediction, CC will shed half of its current membership levels within 18 months.

CC wont be around in five years.

they said that cc wouldnt last back in 07/08..yet it is still alive and kicking atm

I don't know who said that, but they were clearly retarded, CC was growing all through 2007 and most of 2008. But 5 years is an eternity for any site on the web. Hell, Youtube is ...

CC wont be around in five years.