Conquer Club

BRITISH ISLES Sucks

Topics that are not maps. Discuss general map making concepts, techniques, contests, etc, here.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby WidowMakers on Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:44 pm

Kugelblitz22 wrote:Can't we have both?

Why destroy the old to make way for the new? Leave the old maps and make the new maps, there is enough room for both.
You are gonna have to talk to lack about this. It is his call.

WM
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Kugelblitz22 on Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:51 pm

WidowMakers wrote:
Kugelblitz22 wrote:Can't we have both?

Why destroy the old to make way for the new? Leave the old maps and make the new maps, there is enough room for both.
You are gonna have to talk to lack about this. It is his call.

WM


I don't mean have two versions of the British Isles. I mean leave the British Isles they way it is and invest energy into making a new, different map.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Kugelblitz22
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:36 pm
Location: Canton

Postby WidowMakers on Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:57 pm

Kugelblitz22 wrote:
WidowMakers wrote:
Kugelblitz22 wrote:Can't we have both?

Why destroy the old to make way for the new? Leave the old maps and make the new maps, there is enough room for both.
You are gonna have to talk to lack about this. It is his call.

WM


I don't mean have two versions of the British Isles. I mean leave the British Isles they way it is and invest energy into making a new, different map.
OK then you are gonna have to talk to Andy and Coleman about this.

And the original cartographer who requested the revamp. If he wants it changed who are we to stop him?

WM
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Kugelblitz22 on Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:23 pm

Lol, It's just my opinion. I have stated it and am moving on. The above post represents the whole of my efforts to affect the body politic. I am not going to PM anyone and try to change their minds. I want people to do what they want. The thread asked for our opinions on revamping British Isles. I gave it and am done. :D

I'm asking what you think about my map being made a work of art.


The above post is what I think about the map being made "a work of art". Don't do it.

P.S. that's awesome that your from Detroit, Detroit itself or the burbs? I live in Canton.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Kugelblitz22
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:36 pm
Location: Canton

Postby Coleman on Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:58 pm

It's not lack's call, it is the original artist's call always.

Lack is using these maps mostly on an agreement with the original artist and all revamps have been agreed to or requested by the original artists. If these revamps pass the process we have no choice unless lack vetoes them.

Chances are if he did that the original artist may pull their map from the site, so it is unlikely.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby Qwert on Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:00 pm

These is good decision,i hope that map author of Europe map do same thing. :)
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Postby Kugelblitz22 on Sun Dec 16, 2007 7:52 pm

If you guys change the europe map I won't be able to sleep at night.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Kugelblitz22
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:36 pm
Location: Canton

Postby gimil on Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:04 am

I have to say i like hte current graphics of hte europe map, theres nothing unclean or untidy about them. They also give a semi medieval europe feel. Like your playing total war a;; over again.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby gimil on Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:44 am

Im going to pitch my 2 cent on this.

Firstly the point of a revamp is to give a graphically make over to an existing map that doesnt meet hte standards expected of todays maps, fair point. However many people seem to believe that these revamps reduce the playing quality of the map by concentrating on image quality rather than making the map user friendly, another fair point.

Now to the use friendly point. All revamps go through the strict foundry process. This process is suppose to ensure that all maps reach a basic standard of quality while also ensuring that the map is both readable and user friendly.

In my opinion all queched revamps have reached this basic stanrad and are all improvments on the former map. The main reason that people seem to dislike revamps is becasue they are resistant to change, something that is in a lot of people nature. rather than a genuine dislike to the better quality being produced.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Previous

Return to Foundry Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users