Moderator: Cartographers
Lone.prophet wrote:sry but there are ones that need to be done first, like brasil
lanyards wrote:Lone.prophet wrote:sry but there are ones that need to be done first, like brasil
There is a Brazil revamp going on right now but I don't think it is going anywhere.
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME
My stepmom locked the bathroom door
So I opened the lock with my shoelace
pepperonibread wrote:How would everybody feel about one? Either another competition I guess, or I might see if I can contact Hoff (the mapmaker) to get permission. Post your thoughts.
DiM wrote:i voted nay. but not because i don't want germany revamped it's because i don't want any map revamped at least not in the way it has been done so far.
all revamps are fine with the condition that the old map is still available. i simply don't like some revamps and consider the old map better despite the lower graphics. if we have something like an option in the game
[small]
[large]
[revamp]
then i wouldn't care because i'd know i can always switch back to the original.
This is not going to happen. Lack has told me that he does not want both maps on the site. An original might have more history, but in general a revamp looks better. He likes the revamps more and does not want to allow players to choose.militant wrote:DiM wrote:i voted nay. but not because i don't want germany revamped it's because i don't want any map revamped at least not in the way it has been done so far.
all revamps are fine with the condition that the old map is still available. i simply don't like some revamps and consider the old map better despite the lower graphics. if we have something like an option in the game
[small]
[large]
[revamp]
then i wouldn't care because i'd know i can always switch back to the original.
This would definatly keep all the player's happy, although it would create quite a strain on the server to have all the previous maps. With this maybe coleman and andy would be less worried about revamp's in case people kick up a fuss like they did with the canada revamp.
Edit: If i am not mistaken this could be implemted pretty easily, i dont know because i dont progam stuff lol, but if you can have 2 images for each game (large and small) then it would be easy to add a third because they would require the same xml as well. Just a thought
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
militant wrote:If i am not mistaken this could be implemted pretty easily, i dont know because i dont progam stuff lol, but if you can have 2 images for each game (large and small) then it would be easy to add a third because they would require the same xml as well. Just a thought
lanyards wrote:militant wrote:If i am not mistaken this could be implemted pretty easily, i dont know because i dont progam stuff lol, but if you can have 2 images for each game (large and small) then it would be easy to add a third because they would require the same xml as well. Just a thought
Actually, they would need different XMLs. Sometimes the territory names change and the coordinates will always change.
--lanyards
WidowMakers wrote:This is not going to happen. Lack has told me that he does not want both maps on the site. An original might have more history, but in general a revamp looks better. He likes the revamps more and does not want to allow players to choose.
If you have any issues with that , he is th guy to talk to.
WM
lanyards wrote:militant wrote:If i am not mistaken this could be implemted pretty easily, i dont know because i dont progam stuff lol, but if you can have 2 images for each game (large and small) then it would be easy to add a third because they would require the same xml as well. Just a thought
Actually, they would need different XMLs. Sometimes the territory names change and the coordinates will always change.
--lanyards
mibi wrote:DiM wrote:each of us likes a map and is familiar with it and has history on it. once you revamp it all is lost.
big deal. if you are looking for permanence, then avoid the internet.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users