Moderator: Community Team
new guy1 wrote:Also (just because this thought came to my head), maybe to prevent a claim if we want one, the player who is the vig and took a shot last night should have a chance to claim so that the roleblocker doesnt have to claim, only the vig. Just a thought since both of those are pretty powerful and so it would be better for only one person to claim. This is if we even want either of them out in the open, and is just a thought that I came up with before bedtime.
thechuck51 wrote:innocent" however I think there was a busdrive (gibbs arriving in the car??)
jonty125 wrote:thechuck51 wrote:innocent" however I think there was a busdrive (gibbs arriving in the car??)
It almost seems to be a mafia busdriver, from my reading. Shuts the door and does nothing to help Gibbs.
thechuck51 wrote:I think both Isaiah and I need to give our night actions from last night so we can try to make sense out of the scene.
I investigated CM5 and got "innocent" however I think there was a busdrive (gibbs arriving in the car??). At least I know I'm not paranoid, maybe just insane.
thechuck51 wrote:jonty125 wrote:thechuck51 wrote:innocent" however I think there was a busdrive (gibbs arriving in the car??)
It almost seems to be a mafia busdriver, from my reading. Shuts the door and does nothing to help Gibbs.
I don't know. "Mafia Busdriver" is the bigfoot (or skunk ape or sasquatch if you prefer) of this forum. Everybody thinks that one exists but nobody has ever seen one!
I think the person in the diner was bussed with Cm5 and is who i got an innocent result on. If I am insane (which if there is a busdriver who knows what i am) then he is mafia.
A second mafia would be whoever killed CM5. This doesnt mean mafia busdriver since they could have anticipated a bus drive and gotten lucky by targeting another player. I tried this twice as scum in Matrix Mafia, it didnt work and we killed a VT the second time we hit the jackpot and killed Neo.
Now that I think of it, they had no guarantee that there was a busdriver so this may not be accurate.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:I have seen many scum busdrivers. I don't see why you would assume one cannot be here.
Iron Butterfly wrote:thechuck51 wrote:I think both Isaiah and I need to give our night actions from last night so we can try to make sense out of the scene.
I investigated CM5 and got "innocent" however I think there was a busdrive (gibbs arriving in the car??). At least I know I'm not paranoid, maybe just insane.
You got an innocent on CM5 who we know was innocent.
You are not paranoid. The question is are you insane?
If you are insane and there is a bus driver the bus drive had to be with mafia, which would be the only way to get an innocent result.
What confuses me is that if CM5 was bus driven with mafia, then the mafia player would have had to be targeted to kill CM5, which doesn't make sense.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
isaiah40 wrote:Well considering I chose to protect CM5 again, there must be a busdriver.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
crazymilkshake5 wrote:Last night, I blocked Night Strike.
I also FOS edocsil about the "Lynch the rookies". sounds like he just wants to end the day. maybe take heat off of a lead that we have?
thechuck51 wrote:crazymilkshake5 wrote:Last night, I blocked Night Strike.
I also FOS edocsil about the "Lynch the rookies". sounds like he just wants to end the day. maybe take heat off of a lead that we have?
I was re-reading and came across this from yesterday. There was no mafia kill night 2 and strike wolf was blocked night 2 so unless anybody has anything better to go off of I will vote strike wolf
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
safariguy5 wrote:The problem is that scene flavor didn't indicate any protection or roleblock that negated a night kill. So I'm not sure that we can make the argument that strike is the killer. All the same, the Sig Sauer killer is still not clear in my mind whether they are vig or SKer. Seriously, how are they picking their targets? Put names in a hat and draw one out??
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:edocsil wrote:If we don't get anything going here I am going to advocate lynch the rookies. I should have some time to read tonight to see if I can find something better, but I will place a vote one way or another tonight.
Lynch the rookies? Really? That's a terrible idea. Just because someone is new doesn't mean they're scum. And what if we have a mafia full of experienced players? Then we are essentially helping them win. Major FOS to you and new guy (who agreed with you).
Now, I could understand lynching the inactives (such as happyfeet), but that is drastically different from "lynching the rookies".
Mr. Squirrel wrote:I think you missed the part in edocsil's post where he asked for a claim.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Honestly, unless he has an absolutely perfect claim with proof of his innocence, I want to see him lynched now. His lack of a claim makes me think that he doesn't have one to give.
Does anyone know if chap usually gives fakeclaims to scum?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users