Conquer Club

Posted: **Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:45 pm**

Attention all cooks/new recruits

Beware of this player Gen.LeeGettinhed. He sends PM's to inexperienced/new players asking you to join his private games. His only intention is to steal your points by playing you on difficult maps and using game options that new recruits and low ranks have no idea how to play. If he sends you a PM, please forward me the game invitation information and I will gladly join in your place.

JR

Posted: **Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:49 pm**

can I has a game?

Posted: **Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:37 pm**

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Attention all cooks/new recruits

Beware of this player Gen.LeeGettinhed. He sends PM's to inexperienced/new players asking you to join his private games. His only intention is to steal your points by playing you on difficult maps and using game options that new recruits and low ranks have no idea how to play. If he sends you a PM, please forward me the game invitation information and I will gladly join in your place.

JR

Yes,I also believe this player is a teacher in Society of Cooks(maybe he is using this to easily obtain un-suspecting victims under the guise of teaching them)?

Posted: **Thu Feb 04, 2010 7:05 pm**

I definetly just lost to him fun fun in the sun.

Posted: **Thu Feb 04, 2010 7:34 pm**

shiftyfifty wrote:I definetly just lost to him fun fun in the sun.

Shifty - how did you end up in a private game?
Did you enjoy your first game of freestyle?

Posted: **Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:47 pm**

if jr24 is busy, pm me as well...

Posted: **Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:51 pm**

Prankcall wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Attention all cooks/new recruits

Beware of this player Gen.LeeGettinhed. He sends PM's to inexperienced/new players asking you to join his private games. His only intention is to steal your points by playing you on difficult maps and using game options that new recruits and low ranks have no idea how to play. If he sends you a PM, please forward me the game invitation information and I will gladly join in your place.

JR

Yes,I also believe this player is a teacher in Society of Cooks(maybe he is using this to easily obtain un-suspecting victims under the guise of teaching them)?

I do not believe he is one of my teachers. But I will check.

Posted: **Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:53 pm**

I checked he is Not 1 of my teachers

Posted: **Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:58 pm**

lmao

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=395119
Joined:
January 31st, 2010, 1:23 am
(i.e. he had just become a ranked player)
hi, do you want to play a quick Real Time game? in Callouts

by Gen.LeeGettinhed
on Today, 5:59 pm

Posted: **Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:11 pm**

Yep I got my ass wrecked, I'm not complaining though lol. There is a learning process.

Posted: **Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:06 pm**

shiftyfifty wrote:Yep I got my ass wrecked, I'm not complaining though lol. There is a learning process.

If you want a learning process join society of cooks (best option) - or I or many other players will play doubles with you anytime.

A 4 minute game on very difficult settings is hard to learn from.
PM me if you fancy doubles game

Nipper

Posted: **Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:22 pm**

This guy deserves a maxtutstuy treatment. Just reset his points and watch him go nuts.

Posted: **Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:27 pm**

waseemalim wrote:This guy deserves a maxtutstuy treatment. Just reset his points and watch him go nuts.

They won't reset his points; while the mods who did the determining said it was despicable and all sorts of unwanted things, they ruled that what he does, which he calls orchard tendering, doesn't violate CC rules for farming or game abuse.

In the thread where I asked for the ruling, Bruceswar said it's the difference between "18 and legal" and being a minor, that magic-number 6th game that makes farming the inexperienced magically not illegal farming; doesn't matter what the player's percentage of "18+1 day's" is.

Posted: **Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:31 pm**

stahrgazer wrote:
waseemalim wrote:This guy deserves a maxtutstuy treatment. Just reset his points and watch him go nuts.

They won't reset his points; while the mods who did the determining said it was despicable and all sorts of unwanted things, they ruled that what he does, which he calls orchard tendering, doesn't violate CC rules for farming or game abuse.

In the thread where I asked for the ruling, Bruceswar said it's the difference between "18 and legal" and being a minor, that magic-number 6th game that makes farming the inexperienced magically not illegal farming; doesn't matter what the player's percentage of "18+1 day's" is.

yea, I read that decision. but max didn't technically violate any rules either.

Posted: **Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:03 pm**

lmao this guy is trully desperate for points... if this keeps up we may have him as conqueror at some point!

check out his wall:
Occupation: kickin' azz and takin' names. . . and being the CC poster/whippin' boy for near-Farming. NEW YEARS PLEDGE: improve rep; play fewer Cooks; Cook-free since 12/20/09 -- and counting . .

seems like he is proud of his ways..

Posted: **Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:38 pm**

jaimito101 wrote:lmao this guy is trully desperate for points...
seems like he is proud of his ways..

He is.

And, quite frankly, since the site sees nothing illegal about it, he's got nothing to be ashamed of, really. If it's wrong, the site would handle complaints accordingly. If it's not wrong, everyone should try it...if they wish to.

Posted: **Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:46 am**

Yeah, but he is still a "Point Hoarder" at .622, just a step above "Noob Farmer" in the map rank calculator. Nothing of which to be proud.

Posted: **Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:28 pm**

mpjh wrote:Yeah, but he is still a "Point Hoarder" at .622, just a step above "Noob Farmer" in the map rank calculator. Nothing of which to be proud.

That's on ALL his games :-
- if you look at the maps he's been playing SINCE he was warned for 'Farming new recruits' - ( now he is deliberately targeting players who have never played the maps before) i.e. Waterloo. City Mogul, Europa, WWII Europe and BambooJack, - he is a 'N00b Farmer' at 0.272 - 0.402 !!!

A true low life who should be kicked off the site, since the chat in most of his games shows that his 'victims' don't find the games a good experience!

Posted: **Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:54 pm**

This pond life tried to get me into a private game when I was in live chat, I took one look at his profile and told him no.

What massive hole is there in this creatures life that he has to play this way?

That or how small is his penis?

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:31 am**

I wish I would have seen this post before I played him. He was pleasant enough for someone who knew they would win...

Posted: **Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:45 pm**

Impressive! He's currently #8 on the leaderboards. He gets good feedback from opponents, too.

Posted: **Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:18 pm**

macbone wrote:Impressive! He's currently #8 on the leaderboards. He gets good feedback from opponents, too.

Read the thread…

Posted: **Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:07 pm**

shiftyfifty wrote:Yep I got my ass wrecked, I'm not complaining though lol. There is a learning process.

Posted: **Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:43 pm**

I did. Did you check out his profile? Gen.LeeGettinhed

Yeah, some of the ratings are negative, but here are his most recent tags:

5/5/5 - Friendly, Helpful, Talkative, Good Strategy
3/2/3
5/5/5 - Quick, Friendly
5/5/5 - Quick, Helpful, Good Strategy
5/5/5 - Friendly, Good Strategy
5/5/5 - Quick, Leader
5/5/5 - Quick, Friendly, Talkative
5/5/5
5/5/5 - Good Strategy
5/5/5 - Helpful, Talkative, Good Teammate, Good Strategy

He gets a ton of Helpful and Friendly tags.

Not everyone is happy with him; further down the list he gets more negative tags, but he seems to be doing some good.

Posted: **Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:19 pm**

Warstone wrote:I wish I would have seen this post before I played him. He was pleasant enough for someone who knew they would win...

He only gets nasty when he's going to lose.

Conquer Club

Gen.LeeGettinhed

Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed