Page 1 of 2

AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:12 am
by hskerst
Game 6853290


These two players are doing one of the following
Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

I have been playing for some time and this is all a bit obvious. Firstly they are playing a number of games where they are doubled up which is fine. But also as singles in the same game.

They have not actively attacked each other apart from once each once they were dominant. With out communicating with each other they have one by one taken out the opposition. I was strong but individually they were stronger. Instead of trying to keep each other in check they have turn after turn taken bites out of me without any truce between them. They have made no attempt to attack each other apart from the once. This is the first time I have seen this type of action and it is very obvious.

I would like to see the game wiped and the players warned if it is there first offence.

Thanks

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:15 am
by alster
hskerst wrote:Game 6853290


These two players are doing one of the following
Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

I have been playing for some time and this is all a bit obvious. Firstly they are playing a number of games where they are doubled up which is fine. But also as singles in the same game.

They have not actively attacked each other apart from once each once they were dominant. With out communicating with each other they have one by one taken out the opposition. I was strong but individually they were stronger. Instead of trying to keep each other in check they have turn after turn taken bites out of me without any truce between them. They have made no attempt to attack each other apart from the once. This is the first time I have seen this type of action and it is very obvious.

I would like to see the game wiped and the players warned if it is there first offence.

Thanks


AsterixLeGaulois I know - two previous busts:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=96313&p=2202697&hilit=AsterixLeGaulois#p2200739

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=93421&start=0&hilit=AsterixLeGaulois#p2142268

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:27 am
by hskerst
Thats funny that is the same message you gave when AsterixLeGaulois was reported on the link above.

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:36 am
by TheForgivenOne
hskerst wrote:Accused:
AsterixLeGaulois
Raskholnikov

Accused of:
Being Multi's
Secret Diplomacy

Game Number:
Game 6853290

Comments:
I have been playing for some time and this is all a bit obvious. Firstly they are playing a number of games where they are doubled up which is fine. But also as singles in the same game.

They have not actively attacked each other apart from once each once they were dominant. With out communicating with each other they have one by one taken out the opposition. I was strong but individually they were stronger. Instead of trying to keep each other in check they have turn after turn taken bites out of me without any truce between them. They have made no attempt to attack each other apart from the once. This is the first time I have seen this type of action and it is very obvious.

I would like to see the game wiped and the players warned if it is there first offence.

Thanks


Fixed up the form

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:49 am
by hskerst
Thanks for that

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:12 pm
by lord voldemort
busted

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:44 pm
by Raskholnikov
The Owner of the AsterixleGaulois account asked me to nurse his account while being on a military exercise and then visiting his sick grandmother in Europe. I did my best to do so fairly. There is no reason to cancel his account. Please reconsider your decision.

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [closed]es

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:46 pm
by Raskholnikov
The Owner of the AsterixleGaulois account asked me to nurse his account while being on a military exercise and then visiting his sick grandmother in Europe. I did my best to do so fairly. There is no reason to cancel his account. Please reconsider your decision.

Now it seems you downgraded my account too. Please reconsider this too.

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv appeal

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 1:15 pm
by Evil Semp
The proper way to go about appealing a bust is through the e-ticket which can be found on the help page. I also sent you a PM explaining it.

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 1:30 pm
by jefjef
Raskholnikov wrote:The Owner of the AsterixleGaulois account asked me to nurse his account while being on a military exercise and then visiting his sick grandmother in Europe. I did my best to do so fairly. There is no reason to cancel his account. Please reconsider your decision.


RULES: You are NOT allowed to take turns/sit in a game when you are an opponent.

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:05 pm
by lord voldemort
please dont lie to me....

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:45 pm
by GENERAL STONEHAM
He'll just open another freemium account.


Really now, how do you punish a freemium?

No FLAMES here,
GS

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:48 pm
by Masli
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:He'll just open another freemium account.


Really now, how do you punish a freemium?

No FLAMES here,
GS


both accounts had premium

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:32 pm
by hskerst
Surely the first thing to do is call them both lost and kick those user names off conquer club. That will anoy him greatly.

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [closed]es

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 5:06 pm
by Queen_Herpes
Raskholnikov wrote:The Owner of the AsterixleGaulois account asked me to nurse his account while being on a military exercise and then visiting his sick grandmother in Europe. I did my best to do so fairly. There is no reason to cancel his account. Please reconsider your decision.

Now it seems you downgraded my account too. Please reconsider this too.


The moderators on this site do an excellent job of determining who is a multi and who is not. When they render a decison, after careful review, they always come up with the correct solution. It would be a waste of time to try to prove them wrong. The moderators are always right, especially the C&A mods. They are never wrong.

Good luck!

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 5:09 pm
by Queen_Herpes
Clearly the moderators made a decision here, and the decision is the only one that could have been made. These two are cheaters and are in violation of the rules of conquerclub.com. There is only one truth, and it would be impossible for the moderators of this forum to be incorrect.

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 5:10 pm
by GENERAL STONEHAM
Masli wrote:
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:He'll just open another freemium account.


Really now, how do you punish a freemium?

No FLAMES here,
GS


both accounts had premium


Game 6834979 Round 12

Then why is his name in SILVER, instead of GOLD?

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 5:11 pm
by Masli
because it has been stripped of his premium, they have already been busted

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 5:12 pm
by GENERAL STONEHAM
hskerst wrote:Surely the first thing to do is call them both lost and kick those user names off conquer club. That will anoy him greatly.



I agree they both should lose their usernames for cheating. Especially those who's accounts are freemium.

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [closed]es

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 5:18 pm
by lord voldemort
Queen_Herpes wrote:
Raskholnikov wrote:The Owner of the AsterixleGaulois account asked me to nurse his account while being on a military exercise and then visiting his sick grandmother in Europe. I did my best to do so fairly. There is no reason to cancel his account. Please reconsider your decision.

Now it seems you downgraded my account too. Please reconsider this too.


The moderators on this site do an excellent job of determining who is a multi and who is not. When they render a decison, after careful review, they always come up with the correct solution. It would be a waste of time to try to prove them wrong. The moderators are always right, especially the C&A mods. They are never wrong.

Good luck!


we try not to be wrong...we are dealing with some pretty serious issues. we wouldnt be good hunters if we kept getting it wrong

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:12 am
by TheForgivenOne
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:
hskerst wrote:Surely the first thing to do is call them both lost and kick those user names off conquer club. That will anoy him greatly.



I agree they both should lose their usernames for cheating. Especially those who's accounts are freemium.


That's the thing, he wasn't freemium when he was Busted, if i remember correctly

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:23 am
by eddie2
i only have 2 questions on this 1

1)was the busted only a loss of premium

2)is it not a rule that people being busted as multis more than once get guested even if they are premium

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:40 am
by lord voldemort
yes and no

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 5:43 am
by eddie2
lord voldemort wrote:yes and no


ok thanks i was just going by what i read on page 2 post 2 of this thread
[url]
viewtopic.php?f=239&t=114585&start=15[/url]

Re: AsterixLeGaulois and Raskholnikov [busted] lv

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 6:37 am
by lord voldemort
eddie2 wrote:
lord voldemort wrote:yes and no


ok thanks i was just going by what i read on page 2 post 2 of this thread
[url]
viewtopic.php?f=239&t=114585&start=15[/url]


differnet case...