I am amazed ....
With all due respect ... I stated
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
perhaps one player or friends with secret diplomacy"
and I get a few "experts" treating me like a child.
EVIL SEMP with little or no knowledge of probabilities, and a challenge (threat?) to provide more evidence or he "will close this"
darwins_bane claiming I must be "angry" and advising me not to "play freestyle. or do it back, Its called being online"
Before I get the obvious childish flames back to this posting, let me point out a few facts, because clearly you did not read my comments, nor did you take any time to learn about me.
About me:
I am a professor. I teach math and computer programming. One of my topics includes probability.
Secondly, I have played close to 500 games, and only once have I played sequential. I am on the computer many hours (read: employment) and take full advantage of email notices and going last / first.
I do not get angry, except at ignorance. There is no excuse for ignorance.
About the Claim:
Taking one turn 9 minutes apart does not prove anything, especially considering the other time stamps. One can not take a single piece of information and make a broad claim. Taking several (most) moves only a few seconds apart does not prove anything, but does raise suspicions. Thus, the claim is "they are suspected of .... " The claim does NOT say they are guilty. The odds that these two are working completly independent, given the time stamps, are greater than winning the lottery. Outliers do exist, and a person with any knowledge of statistics should know this.
Given the attack in round 9 by tetracorp on A.D. , I am 99.9% sure they are friends, but are having fun, not trying to have an advantage over other players. It is very unlikely that it is two accounts by one person.
Final Comments:
Finally. the forum is to discuss suspicions. NOT to criticize nor attempt to patronize a person who brings suspicions to light. I think some of the people who commented here, have made inappropriate comments and should reconsider what they say. Sarcasm directed at a writer, or childish threats are unnecessary and, at least from me, unwanted.
regards,