Page 1 of 1

open diplomacy msshields and fantassin[Cleared]TFO

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:19 pm
by egerskydiver
game 12455594
Accused:

msshields
fantassin

The accused are suspected of:
unfair diplomacy


Game number(s):12455594



Comments: they talked openly about 1.saving one (red, = fantassin) in having bonuses for africa 2.about a plan to attack me in NA together to take my bonus away.

examples from chat:
1. 2013-03-06 22:18:09 - mshields: not much more i can do
2013-03-06 22:18:12 - mshields: i'll let you have africa

2. mshields: hey red...leave a 1 in bogota and i'll try and break mexico city
2013-03-06 22:05:12 - mshields: or youc an try
2013-03-06 22:05:13 - mshields: and if you don't
2013-03-06 22:05:16 - mshields: then i'll try
2013-03-06 22:05:40 - mshields: but leave a 1 in bogota so it'll be easier to get ther
2013-03-06 22:05:46 - mshields: or not
2013-03-06 22:06:28 - Fantassin: sorry didn't see til now

Waiting for your reaction!
greetz,

egerskydiver

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:26 pm
by mshields
LOL

Blue was clearly in the lead so I let red have africa at the time...

It was openly discussed in the chat

I'm not even sure why I'm defending myself here as this is just awful

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:29 pm
by rishaed
This isn't a crime, part of risk is Diplomacy. Now if you can prove SECRET DIPLOMACY thats another matter. Secret diplomacy is a violation of the rules, and as such is punishable. It doesn't look like anything here is wrong.

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:34 pm
by Edric Wolfswift
This report is frivolous at best. You accuse them of "open diplomacy" and the form says "being multis".

First of all... how is the diplomacy illegal if it is OPEN?

Second... why accuse them of being multies?

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:41 pm
by egerskydiver
being multis means playing two in common, I thought!

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:42 pm
by rishaed
egerskydiver wrote:being multis means playing two in common, I thought!

GO click on the link up top that says RULES, and read the page. It'll help before you fill out another report. ;)

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:45 pm
by Edric Wolfswift
You joined over three years ago, have played almost 10000 games, and you don't know what a multi is????

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:48 pm
by mshields
the title now says, "open diplomacy"

like i said...

L.O.L.

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:50 pm
by egerskydiver
you give no answers but only have a question, I know multi games aren't that doubles, triples etc.?

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:54 pm
by mshields
Multis are people who sign up 2 accounts and are the same person and use both accounts to up each others ranks.

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:55 pm
by egerskydiver
ok thanks , then I am wrong in the title

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:59 pm
by mshields
Can you now explain how it was unfair?

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:03 pm
by egerskydiver
let the admins just tell! What you did in the chat is working together speaking about how to finish my bonus and telling your 'companion' you save his bonus;

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:44 pm
by Edric Wolfswift
Direct quote frokm the rules... "Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating assaults."

If they openly discuss it in the chat, as they did, there is nothing illegal.

Re: open diplomacy msshields and fantassin[Cleared]TFO

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:27 pm
by TheForgivenOne
Cleared. Diplomacy is allowed on the site, as long as it is discussed in the Game chat. If they were communicating via wall/PM/etc, then we could take action, but they did nothing wrong.