Conquer Club

Eagle21
Rockiesman !!!

Accused:

Eagle21
Rockiesman




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis



Game number(s):

Game 18373380
Game 18373300
Game 18373356
Game 18373357
Game 18373560


Comments:

Literally EVERY single game that Eagle21 has played (9 in total) have been against Rockiesman. 8 of them were 1 on 1s and Rockiesman won all 8 of them. The one game that isn't a one on one (18373380) Eagle21 just suicided all his men in the first round.

Yeah, the lack of chat and seconds delay between turns looks dodgy too.

Haha, well, Eagle21 is my 8 year old son who I am teaching to play Risk. He's not very good yet, but I bet he's good enough to beat you. Send him an invite and find out.

Rockiesman wrote:Haha, well, Eagle21 is my 8 year old son who I am teaching to play Risk. He's not very good yet, but I bet he's good enough to beat you. Send him an invite and find out.

You should really play doubles with him. Not 1v1 since you'll get free points, and not multiplayer games where it's very easy for either of you to show favouritism. Don't add unnecessary risk.

iAmCaffeine wrote:

Rockiesman wrote:Haha, well, Eagle21 is my 8 year old son who I am teaching to play Risk. He's not very good yet, but I bet he's good enough to beat you. Send him an invite and find out.

You should really play doubles with him. Not 1v1 since you'll get free points, and not multiplayer games where it's very easy for either of you to show favouritism. Don't add unnecessary risk.

How shitty is CC if you can't play with a friend/family member because he isn't a skilled CC player? Seriously, it's not like he is going to be conqueror that way... I think you should be able to play 1vs1 against your son/girlfriend/friend/cousin/whatever while you are teaching them CC.

Donelladan wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:

Rockiesman wrote:Haha, well, Eagle21 is my 8 year old son who I am teaching to play Risk. He's not very good yet, but I bet he's good enough to beat you. Send him an invite and find out.

You should really play doubles with him. Not 1v1 since you'll get free points, and not multiplayer games where it's very easy for either of you to show favouritism. Don't add unnecessary risk.

How shitty is CC if you can't play with a friend/family member because he isn't a skilled CC player? Seriously, it's not like he is going to be conqueror that way... I think you should be able to play 1vs1 against your son/girlfriend/friend/cousin/whatever while you are teaching them CC.

I agree. I'm just giving him advice based on the rules.

Rockiesman wrote:Haha, well, Eagle21 is my 8 year old son who I am teaching to play Risk. He's not very good yet, but I bet he's good enough to beat you. Send him an invite and find out.

Hmm, I'm not going to invite an 8 year old to anything, sorry Roc. Frankly, it's kind of bizarre that you'd ask a stranger on the internet to do that in the first place.

It's the kind of thing that might make someone doubt your explanation, if one were cynically inclined.

Donelladan wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:

Rockiesman wrote:Haha, well, Eagle21 is my 8 year old son who I am teaching to play Risk. He's not very good yet, but I bet he's good enough to beat you. Send him an invite and find out.

You should really play doubles with him. Not 1v1 since you'll get free points, and not multiplayer games where it's very easy for either of you to show favouritism. Don't add unnecessary risk.

How shitty is CC if you can't play with a friend/family member because he isn't a skilled CC player? Seriously, it's not like he is going to be conqueror that way... I think you should be able to play 1vs1 against your son/girlfriend/friend/cousin/whatever while you are teaching them CC.

I'd usually agree, but the "Send my 8 year old an invite, stranger on the internet" kinda reeks.

@rockiesman, please don't pay attention to Symmetry, he is a troll. Just fyi.

Donelladan wrote:@rockiesman, please don't pay attention to Symmetry, he is a troll. Just fyi.

Look, this isn't a forum where flames are welcome, D. I don't know if you have kids, or have ever looked after kids, but it is genuinely weird if you ask strange men on the internet to invite them to games.

I don't know anyone who would do that, which was why I thought it was weird.

Are u implying we are phedofiles? If so i take grave offense!

Im here to play and have fun! I see no bad in rocks text. And i adviced him to Contact KA with the info that he and his kid are playing so this could be avoided.

Lord Arioch wrote:Are u implying we are phedofiles? If so i take grave offense!

Im here to play and have fun! I see no bad in rocks text. And i adviced him to Contact KA with the info that he and his kid are playing so this could be avoided.

No, I'm implying that I don't believe his story. To break it down, either his other account belongs to him, or to an 8 year old kid:

If it does belong to him, which is by far and away the most likely explanation, then he's cheating.

If it belongs to a kid, then he's either in control of that account's actions, which is cheating, or he's not, which is disturbing.

There are no good versions of this.

Symmetry wrote:

Lord Arioch wrote:Are u implying we are phedofiles? If so i take grave offense!

Im here to play and have fun! I see no bad in rocks text. And i adviced him to Contact KA with the info that he and his kid are playing so this could be avoided.

No, I'm implying that I don't believe his story. To break it down, either his other account belongs to him, or to an 8 year old kid:

If it does belong to him, which is by far and away the most likely explanation, then he's cheating.

If it belongs to a kid, then he's either in control of that account's actions, which is cheating, or he's not, which is disturbing.

There are no good versions of this.

Well, sadly, this creep just proved my wife’s point on why I shouldn’t let my kid play games on the Internet.

This spiraled out of control quite quickly. Locking this until a verdict is reached.

They are Clear of being Multi's.