Conquer Club

Accused:

Scott-Land and Bruceswar


Accused of:

Secret Diplomacy
Intentionally throwing games


Games:

Game 3511099
Game 3494159
Game 3491281


Comments:

Two months ago, in August, KingOfGods created a cheating thread about scott-land and bruceswar, showing that in their 300 games together, scott won over 3700 points while bruce only won 30 games and about 2 points in all. Since then, bruce and scott stopped playing together for a few weeks, and in that time, scott has went from his score of 5520 all the way down to 3600. Ive been going scotts games laughing about how helpless he is without bruce and I think that an unintentional 1900 point loss is a good enough justification that something happened that was against the rules. However, bruce is now back and while scott is coming off of his 15 consecutive losses, it seems with bruce back in scotts games, his losing streak is in the process of turning around.

I think we should all give a hand to scott, for with the help of bruce, he will be making conqueror, once again.

Have fun cheating scott

maxatstuy wrote:Have fun cheating scott

pot... kettle... anyone?-0

This thread should get interesting fast...

if you find ten pages of circular squabbling with little brain activity "interesting."

Have-at-it, guys. Enjoy.

Game 3491281

2008-10-18 16:54:27 - Bruceswar assaulted Gehry from Pei and conquered it from Milow1
2008-10-18 16:54:29 - Bruceswar assaulted Pelli from Gehry and conquered it from Milow1
2008-10-18 16:54:33 - Scott-Land deployed 3 troops on Haring
2008-10-18 16:54:34 - Scott-Land assaulted Thiebaud from Haring and conquered it from whddaz
2008-10-18 16:54:35 - Scott-Land assaulted Rauschenberg from Thiebaud and conquered it from Milow1
2008-10-18 16:54:35 - Scott-Land eliminated Milow1 from the game

Oh, and those 6 seconds of not moving while bruce waited for scott to kill teal and sweep the board, (teal being the the person who bruce reduced to one territory going after,) I am sure will only make scotts journey to conqueror easier

maxatstuy wrote:Game 3491281

2008-10-18 16:54:27 - Bruceswar assaulted Gehry from Pei and conquered it from Milow1
2008-10-18 16:54:29 - Bruceswar assaulted Pelli from Gehry and conquered it from Milow1
2008-10-18 16:54:33 - Scott-Land deployed 3 troops on Haring
2008-10-18 16:54:34 - Scott-Land assaulted Thiebaud from Haring and conquered it from whddaz
2008-10-18 16:54:35 - Scott-Land assaulted Rauschenberg from Thiebaud and conquered it from Milow1
2008-10-18 16:54:35 - Scott-Land eliminated Milow1 from the game

Oh, and those 6 seconds of not moving while bruce waited for scott to kill teal and sweep the board, (teal being the the person who bruce reduced to one territory going after,) I am sure will only make scotts journey to conqueror easier

pot.. kettle.. anyone? and at least i know that bruce is a real person and takes his own turns...-0

owenshooter wrote:

maxatstuy wrote:Game 3491281

2008-10-18 16:54:27 - Bruceswar assaulted Gehry from Pei and conquered it from Milow1
2008-10-18 16:54:29 - Bruceswar assaulted Pelli from Gehry and conquered it from Milow1
2008-10-18 16:54:33 - Scott-Land deployed 3 troops on Haring
2008-10-18 16:54:34 - Scott-Land assaulted Thiebaud from Haring and conquered it from whddaz
2008-10-18 16:54:35 - Scott-Land assaulted Rauschenberg from Thiebaud and conquered it from Milow1
2008-10-18 16:54:35 - Scott-Land eliminated Milow1 from the game

Oh, and those 6 seconds of not moving while bruce waited for scott to kill teal and sweep the board, (teal being the the person who bruce reduced to one territory going after,) I am sure will only make scotts journey to conqueror easier

pot.. kettle.. anyone? and at least i know that bruce is a real person and takes his own turns...-0

I never called them multis, if they were, they would have been busted a long time ago. I just made the simple statement that Scott seems to do much better when Bruce gifts him games

maxatstuy wrote:Two months ago, in August, KingOfGods created a cheating thread about scott-land and bruceswar, showing that in their 300 games together, scott won over 3700 points while bruce only won 30 games and about 2 points in all. Since then, bruce and scott stopped playing together for a few weeks, and in that time, scott has went from his score of 5520 all the way down to 3600. Ive been going scotts games laughing about how helpless he is without bruce and I think that an unintentional 1900 point loss is a good enough justification that something happened that was against the rules. However, bruce is now back and while scott is coming off of his 15 consecutive losses, it seems with bruce back in scotts games, his losing streak is in the process of turning around.

Game 3491281

I think we should all give a hand to scott, for with the help of bruce, he will be making conqueror, once again.

Have fun cheating scott

I knew of this already but thanks for the post

This should be in C&A. You might as well edit your first post to include the appropriate form while we're waiting for this to be moved.

Ah the 14 year old is whining again, did one of your zits burst and upset you

joecoolfrog wrote:Ah the 14 year old is whining again, did one of your zits burst and upset you

wait... 14? *snicker*... anyway, this should be moved to C&A...-0

owenshooter wrote:

joecoolfrog wrote:Ah the 14 year old is whining again, did one of your zits burst and upset you

wait... 14? *snicker*... anyway, this should be moved to C&A...-0

It wont be moved because its already been investigated and shown to be a load of garbage.
Simply one cheat trying to justify himself by throwing mud at others, site should do itself a favour by banning the OP ( or getting his mum to threaten to take his milk and cookies away if he doesnt stop being a naughty boy )

comic boy wrote:It wont be moved because its already been investigated and shown to be a load of garbage.

well, maybe a mod could merge it with one of the other 5 threads started by the OP with the same accusations... hmmmmm....-0

sigh... so max watches another game... what else is new... I lost 19 vs 11 for a kill... scott gets it... big deal.. nothing to see here.. move on ...

Bruceswar wrote:sigh... so max watches another game... what else is new... I lost 19 vs 11 for a kill... scott gets it... big deal.. nothing to see here.. move on ...

so you soften the opponent for Scott to finish. good team work !

timmy was right there as well.... his response.... "sorry was in another game or I would have had the kill" no teamwork ever. this time it was all about the dice.... 19 vs 11 for the kill and lost the roll.

Bruceswar wrote:sigh... so max watches another game... what else is new... I lost 19 vs 11 for a kill... scott gets it... big deal.. nothing to see here.. move on ...

when your 14 and your world revolves around CC and figuring out how to gain points with as little opposition and competition as possible, it is a big deal...-0

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:sigh... so max watches another game... what else is new... I lost 19 vs 11 for a kill... scott gets it... big deal.. nothing to see here.. move on ...

so you soften the opponent for Scott to finish. good team work !

So Mr Expert how many 6-8 player singles games have you won in the last year, try to stick to subjects that you have some sort of clue about

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:sigh... so max watches another game... what else is new... I lost 19 vs 11 for a kill... scott gets it... big deal.. nothing to see here.. move on ...

so you soften the opponent for Scott to finish. good team work !

So Mr Expert how many 6-8 player singles games have you won in the last year, try to stick to subjects that you have some sort of clue about

Lol, nice catch. Only 1 game and it was a doodle.

Wow.. so many bad vibes... and from both sides...

Feels like the American election process

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:sigh... so max watches another game... what else is new... I lost 19 vs 11 for a kill... scott gets it... big deal.. nothing to see here.. move on ...

so you soften the opponent for Scott to finish. good team work !

So Mr Expert how many 6-8 player singles games have you won in the last year, try to stick to subjects that you have some sort of clue about

pretty tough to do when you form alliances to beat me....how gay

"lets eliminate JR so we can play another game to determine the winner of this game" ....gay

instead of playing the game according to the options that were created before you join, your cried like a little bitch when the game took to long to play and form alliances to beat me.

unless your dad posted that for you? Well, im sure he doesnt have access to your account so I doubt it

Undoubtedly, one of scotts biggest fans is most probably DAT, and even in the last game that bruce and scott played together, it was DAT who called bruce out for attempting to cheat. Granted he didnt call it cheating, but after bruce made a kill, DAT wrote in game chat:

2008-10-19 04:02:47 - DAT_WAT_SHE_SAID: bruce, y leave kline till last, if scott wasnt connectionally retarted he wuda got that

Game 3494159

Bruce left the only territory which scott had access to, and which would have given scott the steal, for last. This kill was for 5 cards and bruce was gifting it to scott. Scott may have messed up, but it doesnt change the fact that bruce was trying to gift scott the game. Anyone refuting this is clearly a moron of just another person who is trying to stay off of scotts ignore list

btw, Im 15. Try reading the other 100 posts where may age is mentioned.

maxatstuy wrote:Undoubtedly, one of scotts biggest fans is most probably DAT, and even in the last game that bruce and scott played together, it was DAT who called bruce out for attempting to cheat. Granted he didnt call it cheating, but after bruce made a kill, DAT wrote in game chat:

2008-10-19 04:02:47 - DAT_WAT_SHE_SAID: bruce, y leave kline till last, if scott wasnt connectionally retarted he wuda got that

Game 3494159

Bruce left the only territory which scott had access to, and which would have given scott the steal, for last. This kill was for 5 cards and bruce was gifting it to scott. Scott may have messed up, but it doesnt change the fact that bruce was trying to gift scott the game. Anyone refuting this is clearly a moron of just another person who is trying to stay off of scotts ignore list

btw, Im 15. Try reading the other 100 posts where may age is mentioned.

That's just awesome !
Even if Bruce wins the game, he's still giving it away to scott !?

Btw, when your 15 you shouldn't spent all day on CC. You should have fun with other children !;)

frankiebee wrote:

maxatstuy wrote:
btw, Im 15. Try reading the other 100 posts where may age is mentioned.

Btw, when your 15 you shouldn't spent all day on CC. You should have fun with other children !;)

When your 15, there is a world of importance between that venerable age and 14.

Fruitcake wrote:

frankiebee wrote:

maxatstuy wrote:
btw, Im 15. Try reading the other 100 posts where may age is mentioned.

Btw, when your 15 you shouldn't spent all day on CC. You should have fun with other children !;)

When your 15, there is a world of importance between that venerable age and 14.

and when you're past 40, you should know better

jiminski wrote:

Fruitcake wrote:

frankiebee wrote:

maxatstuy wrote:
btw, Im 15. Try reading the other 100 posts where may age is mentioned.

Btw, when your 15 you shouldn't spent all day on CC. You should have fun with other children !;)

When your 15, there is a world of importance between that venerable age and 14.

and when you're past 40, you should know better

well spotted....obviously shouldn't have finished that last bottle.