Page 1 of 3

moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen,kevinator[cleared]

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:57 pm
by porkenbeans
The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis





Game 3554593




Comments:

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:39 pm
by Frop
You joined a game against high rankers with two random cooks and you're losing? They must be multis.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:12 pm
by lancehoch
Can you put the names of the accused in the post please?

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:16 pm
by Frop
lancehoch wrote:Can you put the names of the accused in the post please?

I think you can save him the trouble by locking this thread already, or do you really want to waste a hunter's time on this?

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:28 pm
by Jeff Hardy
kinda doubt theyre multis...

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:29 pm
by codeblue1018
Pork,, Greatwhite is in no way a cheater. Trust me!

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:41 pm
by Frop
codeblue1018 wrote:Pork,, Greatwhite is in no way a cheater. Trust me!

This guy has played almost a thousand games and still manages to come up with such a ridiculous accusation. Do you really expect to get through to him?

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:20 pm
by porkenbeans
codeblue1018 wrote:Pork,, Greatwhite is in no way a cheater. Trust me!

:D Hey code, wattup ? I'll lay it out and then you can tell me, ok ? So I saw this 6-player trip game with 3 high rankers and 2 cooks already joined. I knew from the start that it could be trouble. i decided to join and make it very clear that I would accept suggs. But, before they took their turns, they would wait for my orders. They agreed, and followed them perfectly. In conversation they told me that, they never played our opponents before. which turned out to be NOT true. Thats strike 1. Well, we quickly took control. All modesty aside, I do know how to pass armies and such to win at partners. Anyways, all of a sudden both my partners went totaly off the reservation. with moves that only helped the other team. Now I know what your saying, COOKS !!! This was no ordonary ''bad cook move'' Im talking about all out sabatage. purposfuly forting off of our front lines, so they could come in and bust our bonus. My team mates did everything they could to take a dive. Strike 2. The game was in the bag, I wondered why my mates stopped chatting with me. No suggs., no questions about their orders. ...Nothing. Strike 3. The game is still going and I have told all the players about my report. please follow the progress if you want. I am interested to see how they will continue to play this one out. 8-)

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:31 pm
by samuelc812
Perhaps it is just cooks being cooks, sometimes people go crazy for no weird reason, all i know is that i am good friends with Greatwhite and he is no cheat ;)

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:35 pm
by Bruceswar
This is absurd. When will the stupidity every stop. These 2 are cooks for a reason. They cannot tell who is winning a game and what the front lines are. The 3 high ranks are not multi's. I have played with all 3 of these guys many times. They need to give people like you who waste the multi hunters time a warning for the first time, and then more action taken second time around.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:40 pm
by hwhrhett
ya know, you have to be pretty horrible at this game to be a cook, most people dont ever go below 1000, it takes exceptional stupidity, and that is what you should expect when you play with them.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:01 pm
by porkenbeans
Bruceswar wrote:This is absurd. When will the stupidity every stop. These 2 are cooks for a reason. They cannot tell who is winning a game and what the front lines are. The 3 high ranks are not multi's. I have played with all 3 of these guys many times. They need to give people like you who waste the multi hunters time a warning for the first time, and then more action taken second time around.
I am only reporting my suspesion, as I was advised in the past. You will note that I have not been burning up this forum with reports on people. I made this one because I do not know these players well. And did not know if the hunters had similar reports on them, or not. If not, Im half confident that Such high rankers would NOT start this late in the game to cheat. After much research I have found that CC has busted various cheaters in the past that were highly thought of. I truely dont know if this is the case here, I only offer this for, possible colaberating evidence. If there are no other such similer reports,... my bad. 8-)

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:18 pm
by Bruceswar
You joined with cooks. Expect cook type plays. Deal with it. You call these people all multi's. Do you really think they would have made it so long on CC without people noticing? If you want to say secret diplomacy, do you not think that would have been brought up before? You might want to do more research before you make a post next time. This is an open and shut case. So what if I cook cannot remember everybody they play. I have played 2000+ games and I could not tell you half of the people I have played. I forget who is who. I may have played a game with person X and do not even know it. So lets review


1. You join a game vs higher ranks with 2 cooks.
2. You then expect to tell them exactly what do to and have them execute it perfectly.
3. During the game you are in the lead and the cooks go on their own, so you start to wonder why they are not talking to you.
4. You then claim they are now helping the other team.
5. You then make a bogus report because you are playing with 2 cooks, who do not know any better and make bad plays.

Terrible way to go about a game. Remind me to never play a game with you.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:26 pm
by Digital Jihad
Bruceswar wrote:You joined with cooks. Expect cook type plays. Deal with it. You call these people all multi's. Do you really think they would have made it so long on CC without people noticing? If you want to say secret diplomacy, do you not think that would have been brought up before? You might want to do more research before you make a post next time. This is an open and shut case. So what if I cook cannot remember everybody they play. I have played 2000+ games and I could not tell you half of the people I have played. I forget who is who. I may have played a game with person X and do not even know it. So lets review


1. You join a game vs higher ranks with 2 cooks.
2. You then expect to tell them exactly what do to and have them execute it perfectly.
3. During the game you are in the lead and the cooks go on their own, so you start to wonder why they are not talking to you.
4. You then claim they are now helping the other team.
5. You then make a bogus report because you are playing with 2 cooks, who do not know any better and make bad plays.

Terrible way to go about a game. Remind me to never play a game with you.

Heh that summed it up pretty well.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:37 pm
by porkenbeans
Bruceswar wrote:You joined with cooks. Expect cook type plays. Deal with it. You call these people all multi's. Do you really think they would have made it so long on CC without people noticing? If you want to say secret diplomacy, do you not think that would have been brought up before? You might want to do more research before you make a post next time. This is an open and shut case. So what if I cook cannot remember everybody they play. I have played 2000+ games and I could not tell you half of the people I have played. I forget who is who. I may have played a game with person X and do not even know it. So lets review


1. You join a game vs higher ranks with 2 cooks.
2. You then expect to tell them exactly what do to and have them execute it perfectly.
3. During the game you are in the lead and the cooks go on their own, so you start to wonder why they are not talking to you.
4. You then claim they are now helping the other team.
5. You then make a bogus report because you are playing with 2 cooks, who do not know any better and make bad plays.

Terrible way to go about a game. Remind me to never play a game with you.
Both cooks have only played 4 or 5 games. They said they never played each other. The moves were more than just bad cooks moves. I guess you would have to be there to fully comprehend what im saying. I am not absolutley possitive they are indeed cheaters, Just throwing one on the colaborating stack for the hunters.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:46 pm
by fishydance
porkenbeans wrote:I am only reporting my suspesion, as I was advised in the past. You will note that I have not been burning up this forum with reports on people. I made this one because I do not know these players well. And did not know if the hunters had similar reports on them, or not. If not, Im half confident that Such high rankers would NOT start this late in the game to cheat. After much research I have found that CC has busted various cheaters in the past that were highly thought of. I truely dont know if this is the case here, I only offer this for, possible colaberating evidence. If there are no other such similer reports,... my bad. 8-)


In the future you would be wise to perform 'much research' before lodging a multi accusation against a player such as Greatwhite. While doing said research, I'd also recommend availing yourself of a good spell checker.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:47 pm
by Bruceswar
porkenbeans wrote:Both cooks have only played 4 or 5 games.

1. 4 or 5 games? Agewen - has completed 37 games. Only won 4, which is why he is a cook. kevinator - 40 games completed. Only won 3, which is why he is a cook. Way more than the 4 of 5 you stated.

porkenbeans wrote:They said they never played each other.

2. Who cares if they have played. Many people do not remember who they play from 1 game to the next.

porkenbeans wrote:The moves were more than just bad cooks moves. I guess you would have to be there to fully comprehend what im saying.

3. Any move is never too bad for a cook. They make moves that never make any sense all the time. This is why they are a cook.

porkenbeans wrote:I am not absolutley possitive they are indeed cheaters, Just throwing one on the colaborating stack for the hunters.

4. You are wasting the multi hunters time. Nothing more.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:58 pm
by porkenbeans
Digital Jihad wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:You joined with cooks. Expect cook type plays. Deal with it. You call these people all multi's. Do you really think they would have made it so long on CC without people noticing? If you want to say secret diplomacy, do you not think that would have been brought up before? You might want to do more research before you make a post next time. This is an open and shut case. So what if I cook cannot remember everybody they play. I have played 2000+ games and I could not tell you half of the people I have played. I forget who is who. I may have played a game with person X and do not even know it. So lets review


1. You join a game vs higher ranks with 2 cooks.
2. You then expect to tell them exactly what do to and have them execute it perfectly.
3. During the game you are in the lead and the cooks go on their own, so you start to wonder why they are not talking to you.
4. You then claim they are now helping the other team.
5. You then make a bogus report because you are playing with 2 cooks, who do not know any better and make bad plays.

Terrible way to go about a game. Remind me to never play a game with you.

Heh that summed it up pretty well.
What I find interesting is, why would a noob with 7 games be interested in this furum. you supposidly dont even know, and never even played these players. I do see that you've beaten a couple of crossed swords though. =D>

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:13 pm
by porkenbeans
hwhrhett wrote:ya know, you have to be pretty horrible at this game to be a cook, most people dont ever go below 1000, it takes exceptional stupidity, and that is what you should expect when you play with them.
This is your own quote. ''in cc history, even some of the most high respected players have found to be cheating sometimes''... ...So you twitts can get off my back. I will report any and all susp. activity. I dont care who you are. Or, who people think you are. :twisted:

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:20 pm
by Digital Jihad
porkenbeans wrote:
Digital Jihad wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:You joined with cooks. Expect cook type plays. Deal with it. You call these people all multi's. Do you really think they would have made it so long on CC without people noticing? If you want to say secret diplomacy, do you not think that would have been brought up before? You might want to do more research before you make a post next time. This is an open and shut case. So what if I cook cannot remember everybody they play. I have played 2000+ games and I could not tell you half of the people I have played. I forget who is who. I may have played a game with person X and do not even know it. So lets review


1. You join a game vs higher ranks with 2 cooks.
2. You then expect to tell them exactly what do to and have them execute it perfectly.
3. During the game you are in the lead and the cooks go on their own, so you start to wonder why they are not talking to you.
4. You then claim they are now helping the other team.
5. You then make a bogus report because you are playing with 2 cooks, who do not know any better and make bad plays.

Terrible way to go about a game. Remind me to never play a game with you.

Heh that summed it up pretty well.
What I find interesting is, why would a noob with 7 games be interested in this furum. you supposidly dont even know, and never even played these players. I do see that you've beaten a couple of crossed swords though. =D>


I don't know these players. Yet I will tell you to be a cook it seems you have to be pretty bad. So my advice don't play with cooks.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:21 pm
by #1_stunna
did i just see Greatwhites name?

really?! multi? cheater?

no way possible, what a waste of a thread.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:23 pm
by Digital Jihad
#1_stunna wrote:did i just see Greatwhites name?

really?! multi? cheater?

no way possible, what a waste of a thread.

:lol:

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:24 pm
by Gold Knight
Go for it, way to blacklist yourself against playing some of the better players on this site because now they dont even want to deal with you...

And I really cant think of many respected players that get busted on here, unless your talking about high ranks, and a good lot of them have very little respect from the CC community (not posting any names here... ;) ). Chill out with your accusations, find some decent team mates and maybe these problems wont come up again.

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:25 pm
by porkenbeans
Digital Jihad wrote:
porkenbeans wrote:
Digital Jihad wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:You joined with cooks. Expect cook type plays. Deal with it. You call these people all multi's. Do you really think they would have made it so long on CC without people noticing? If you want to say secret diplomacy, do you not think that would have been brought up before? You might want to do more research before you make a post next time. This is an open and shut case. So what if I cook cannot remember everybody they play. I have played 2000+ games and I could not tell you half of the people I have played. I forget who is who. I may have played a game with person X and do not even know it. So lets review


1. You join a game vs higher ranks with 2 cooks.
2. You then expect to tell them exactly what do to and have them execute it perfectly.
3. During the game you are in the lead and the cooks go on their own, so you start to wonder why they are not talking to you.
4. You then claim they are now helping the other team.
5. You then make a bogus report because you are playing with 2 cooks, who do not know any better and make bad plays.

Terrible way to go about a game. Remind me to never play a game with you.

Heh that summed it up pretty well.
What I find interesting is, why would a noob with 7 games be interested in this furum. you supposidly dont even know, and never even played these players. I do see that you've beaten a couple of crossed swords though. =D>


I don't know these players. Yet I will tell you to be a cook it seems you have to be pretty bad. So my advice don't play with cooks.
The only cooks that I can not carry are the multi-cooks

Re: moonsoon7, beersurfer, Greatwhite, Agewen, kevinator

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:28 pm
by Gold Knight
porkenbeans wrote:The only cooks that I can not carry are the multi-cooks


Apparently not... :roll: