Page 1 of 1

alliances [Cleared/Busted +1]

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:45 pm
by *Pixar*
Nicholas=Victory and Jonathan Hawkes




Accused:

[player]Nicholas=Victory[/player]
[player]Jonathan Hawkes[/player]




The accused are suspected of:

Being alliances
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Severe swearing
Other: mean



Game number(s):

[game]4713199[/game]




Comments: they seem to break me every chance they get and saying alliance open for buisness

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:49 pm
by Jonathan Hawkes
This guy is hilarious. Me and Red were playing, fighting, normal. Blue starts winning, so naturally we're trying not to hand him the game. Then he starts whining about us being an alliance. So, I then stated "Red would you like to have an alliances until blue is dead" in which he agreed. This was after blue threatened us by saying his friend was a mod and that we'd be banned, even though we'd done nothing wrong. There was no secret alliance. We're definitely not a multi. This case needs to be dismissed and Pixar's mod friend needs to be removed as a mod if Pixar is going to be using that as a threat in the future.

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:54 pm
by karel
Jonathan Hawkes wrote:This guy is hilarious. Me and Red were playing, fighting, normal. Blue starts winning, so naturally we're trying not to hand him the game. Then he starts whining about us being an alliance. So, I then stated "Red would you like to have an alliances until blue is dead" in which he agreed. This was after blue threatened us by saying his friend was a mod and that we'd be banned, even though we'd done nothing wrong. There was no secret alliance. We're definitely not a multi. This case needs to be dismissed and Pixar's mod friend needs to be removed as a mod if Pixar is going to be using that as a threat in the future.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Why dismiss it,lets see what the mods come up with first :lol: :lol:

not sure why you would need to make a alliance in a 3 player game.

This was after blue threatened us by saying his friend was a mod and that we'd be banned,
"i did not see anythingthing about his friend being a mod anyplace in game chat" get your facts straight

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:57 pm
by *Pixar*
still alliance is alliance which is a rule does not matter that im a cryer u guys still gained up on me

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:58 pm
by Jonathan Hawkes
This was after blue threatened us by saying his friend was a mod and that we'd be banned,
"i did not see anythingthing about his friend being a mod anyplace in game chat" get your facts straight


Get your facts straight and don't put your nose where it doesn't belong.

"2009-04-19 15:30:05 - Pixar: i will im friends with a mod"

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:00 pm
by *Pixar*
what does that have to do with anything im saying i know someone who can see this

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:08 pm
by Jonathan Hawkes
Pixar wrote:what does that have to do with anything im saying i know someone who can see this


What does this have to do with anything? You said "I have a friend who's a mod". Then shortly after you said he's going to ban us. This was prior to me even talking to red. If we get banned, this site is a joke for real. It means that mods abuse their powers. We played by the rules. You were just mad you were losing, and you could have won if you kept your mouth shut. They need to make this site 18 years of age and older to avoid these things with kids like you. I'm a 24 year old guy pleading my case against a 13 year old. This is ridiculous. I'm done. The game itself states my facts. If I get banned, so be it. I'll know I got banned for no good reason.

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:12 pm
by *Pixar*
dude alliances are not aloud u should be banned why is a guy like u playing this when risk is a kids game not a guy who should be out doing stuff kids have nothing to do

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:16 pm
by Jonathan Hawkes
Lol. That's the reason I should be banned? Cause I'm not a kid? Good one. We didn't have an alliance. Then you accused us of having one, so we made one. It's your own fault.

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:17 pm
by Jonathan Hawkes
Also, I've read the rules dude. It says nothing against diplomacy. It only says no secret ones. Here's the rule since you seem to have missed it.

"Rule #2: No secret diplomacy

Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat in English or in a language that all opponents understand. Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating assaults. Secret diplomacy can be hard to prove, but if you suspect it you should leave the players in question appropriate ratings. If you feel certain about players engaging in secret diplomacy consider reporting them in the Cheating & Abuse Reports forum by posting a new topic."

In fact, read that first line.

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:23 pm
by king sam
Pixar wrote:Accused:
Nicholas=Victory
Jonathan Hawkes


The accused are suspected of:
Being alliances
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Severe swearing
Other: mean


Game number(s):
Game 4713199


Comments: they seem to break me every chance they get and saying alliance open for buisness


Form filled with tags

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:46 pm
by *Pixar*
dude u need to understand what im saying im not trying to ban u because ur older cause u negotiated a truce which should not be aloud ;)

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:51 pm
by *Pixar*
if CC wanted alliances the would of made a 2vs1 game type but they didnt did they? :?:

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:58 pm
by Darwins_Bane
I think there is a misunderstanding here. Pixar, what you need to understand is that alliances are allowed. The only thing that isnt allowed is if the alliance is in secret. In this situation it seems to be out in plain view

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:59 pm
by the.killing.44
Pixar wrote:if CC wanted alliances the would of made a 2vs1 game type but they didnt did they? :?:

Alliances are okay, as long as tehy are posted in the game chat. They did.

.44

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 5:14 pm
by *Pixar*
whatever this game is so cheap :sick:

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:43 pm
by lancehoch
Nicholas=Victory is Busted with Lorrie Wolaver.
Jonathan Hawkes is Cleared of secret diplomacy.

Alliances are allowed in games if all of the diplomatic discussion takes place in the game chat. From the game log, it looks like blue (Pixar was leading and the two other players each decided to try and even out the game. Pixar, I do not know who you were talking about, but presenting yourself as a mod or pretending that you can get someone banned is not allowed. Please refrain from this in the future.

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:14 pm
by Woodruff
Jonathan Hawkes wrote:
This was after blue threatened us by saying his friend was a mod and that we'd be banned,
"i did not see anythingthing about his friend being a mod anyplace in game chat" get your facts straight


Get your facts straight and don't put your nose where it doesn't belong.


Excuse you? You're posting in a PUBLIC FORUM...so you should expect people to post their thoughts on it. If you can't handle that, then I suggest that you don't post in a PUBLIC FORUM.

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:40 pm
by karel
lancehoch wrote:Nicholas=Victory is Busted with Lorrie Wolaver.
Jonathan Hawkes is Cleared of secret diplomacy.

Alliances are allowed in games if all of the diplomatic discussion takes place in the game chat. From the game log, it looks like blue (Pixar was leading and the two other players each decided to try and even out the game. Pixar, I do not know who you were talking about, but presenting yourself as a mod or pretending that you can get someone banned is not allowed. Please refrain from this in the future.



first thing is maybe you should re read it again ......i did not see pixar say anything about being a mod and he was not acting like one :o

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:30 am
by king sam
karel wrote:first thing is maybe you should re read it again ......i did not see pixar say anything about being a mod and he was not acting like one :o


Game 4713199 Chat wrote:2009-04-19 16:28:43 - Pixar: see u guys are teaming up on me because of rank
2009-04-19 16:28:50 - Pixar: ill report u 2

2009-04-19 16:29:40 - Jonathan Hawkes: Go ahead and report. We haven't done anything wrong
2009-04-19 16:29:56 - Pixar: ok
2009-04-19 16:30:05 - Pixar: i will im friends with a mod

2009-04-19 16:31:09 - Pixar: i can tell that green has a double account


He may not have said it directly but he hinted that his associations with a Mod could get other users banned if they didnt stop with an alliance that they are allowed to have

Re: alliances [Cleared/Busted +1]

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:02 am
by Jonathan Hawkes
Thanks for proving me innocent mods. No need to discuss things further.

Re: alliances [Cleared/Busted +1]

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:51 am
by *Pixar*
at least one of them is busted

Re: alliances

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:12 pm
by DarthBlood
Pixar wrote:dude alliances are not aloud u should be banned why is a guy like u playing this when risk is a kids game not a guy who should be out doing stuff kids have nothing to do

ummm...by "aloud"...does this guy mean aloud like outloud, or aloud as in ALLOWED.

lol...

and alliances ARE "allowed". as long as it's in the open, which they did.

edit: oh wait this thread is already cleared. whoops, i guess i forgot lol. verdict: pixar is whiny and should get slapped.