Page 1 of 1

astiggamay ratings abuse [noted]

PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:35 am
by AAFitz
Accused:

astiggamay



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Severe PM Abuse
Other: <Explanation>



His left Ratings page link:


http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... astiggamay



Comments: Pretty much leaving blanket bad ratings for everyone. Even admitted as much when I questioned him with this.

Sent: Sat Apr 25, 2009 3:39 am
From: astiggamay
To: AAFitz
sorry bout the ratings pal it was just for fun and i just guesse that you deserve the rating and your wining. :lol:

Re: astiggamay ratings abuse

PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:50 am
by the.killing.44
I agree. Also check his wall —› memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=271309
foed, hopefully you hunters can deal with him ;)

.44

Re: astiggamay ratings abuse

PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 8:50 pm
by astiggamay
the guy is a jerk and a complete moron who cant accept about his rating those ratings are for real and its true his winning :lol:

Re: astiggamay ratings abuse

PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:10 pm
by kiddicus maximus
I finally found a good reason to use the "foe" button. Thanks astiggamay! Despite your 500 ranking, I would've played a game against you... but after reading some of the stuff on your wall and on your ratings, it appears that you are not the type of person I would enjoy playing.

You, good sir, are up there on my "foe" board all by yourself.

Re: astiggamay ratings abuse

PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:32 pm
by Woodruff
the.killing.44 wrote:I agree. Also check his wall —› memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=271309
foed, hopefully you hunters can deal with him ;)
.44


It's players like this guy who will drive newbies away. If this guy is their first game, it's unlikely they'll come back for a second one.

Re: astiggamay ratings abuse

PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:32 pm
by king achilles
Checking astiggamay's recent ratings given, the most questionable rating right now is the one he gave to Iron Maid. In this case, we would be needing those specific ratings that needs to be looked at.