Conquer Club

ironsij0287 wrote:

cairnswk wrote:ironsij0287...i recently viewed on Tv that Morocco was administering Western Sahara and had almost taken over that country.
any thoughts on that issues in regard to inclding the "disputed" country of Western Sahara in this map?

Western Sahara is tough. If I include all that territory I'm really gonna tax my size and space constraints. Also, no offense to Western Saharans but there's not much there really. Its pretty sparsely populated and the physical geography is lacking a bit.

I say then use that and reflect it in gameplay. In my mind at least, I always think of one when I think of the other. You can't very well have Morocco without Western Sahara! I say go for it.

-Sully

Victor Sullivan wrote:

ironsij0287 wrote:

cairnswk wrote:ironsij0287...i recently viewed on Tv that Morocco was administering Western Sahara and had almost taken over that country.
any thoughts on that issues in regard to inclding the "disputed" country of Western Sahara in this map?

Western Sahara is tough. If I include all that territory I'm really gonna tax my size and space constraints. Also, no offense to Western Saharans but there's not much there really. Its pretty sparsely populated and the physical geography is lacking a bit.

I say then use that and reflect it in gameplay. In my mind at least, I always think of one when I think of the other. You can't very well have Morocco without Western Sahara! I say go for it.

-Sully

Just tinkering with it, I have to reduce my scale in half to include Western Sahara.

If adding it will kill the rest of the map's layout, there's really no point in adding it, in my opinion.

Well, I mean, there's always Supersize...

-Sully

Supersize for a single continent or even worse a single territory? That's a gross abuse of the supersize regulations and certainly not a justification to be allowed.

TaCktiX wrote:Supersize for a single continent or even worse a single territory? That's a gross abuse of the supersize regulations and certainly not a justification to be allowed.

Why not? Maps have received supersize for less.

natty_dread wrote:

TaCktiX wrote:Supersize for a single continent or even worse a single territory? That's a gross abuse of the supersize regulations and certainly not a justification to be allowed.

Why not? Maps have received supersize for less.

Yeah, what is so sacred about the supersizing.

in fact we should go back and super size Texas Wars, just on principal.

As far as I've seen, supersize has been given in two cases: the concept literally needs that much space to make sense (R&C's Small, e.g.), or the extra space is needed to clarify elements on the map. Adding a single flavor territory doesn't really fall under that.

I think I need to have this project binned. I just haven't had time to work on it and I don't when I will again.

Understood. Just let us know when you've got another update handy.

[MOVED]

I don't think I will be picking this one back up. If someone else wants to they have my blessing.