Moderator: Cartographers
edbeard wrote:definitely stay with names.
the less territories thing.....but which the huge number of territories they don't work well at the moment.
Good Luck
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:Kaplowitz buddy i think your better striping it right back and starting with the basics.
1. basic layout - with boarders basic continent colors
2. Plain colored background
3. dimple legends
3. Terr names with no effects and a simple font
4. impassable as simple lines
from here we can tackles issues one by one
what do you say
oaktown wrote:Hi kaplowitz, please read this post in the spirit of constructive criticism in which it was intended.
Every month somebody wants to do another US state map. And while New York is certainly more interesting than, say, Arkansas (my head is still spinning around that one), I keep coming back to the same questions around state maps...
1. is there any appeal beyond people who live in that state?
2. does it make sense as a geographic region on which a battle may be waged? If this were a battleground and you've got a stack of armies along our front, why wouldn't I just go into Pennsylvania and whack you from behind?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users